| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
aryanu
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: Now is the best time in decades to buy munucipal bonds. Why? |
|
|
Please pardon my ignorance on this topic.
As per Mad Money on CNBC today (http://www.cnbc.com/id/23391535)
They are saying this - " Cramer agreed with bond guru Bill Gross, who said that now is the best time in decades to buy municipal bonds"
Can anyone please explain why now is the best time to buy municipal bonds? And which VG funds are recommended for the same.
Thanks for your replies in advance.
-Aryanu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indexfundfan

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Because muni's are now yielding more in nominal terms than treasury bonds, of the same duration.
Example:
VG Intermediate term tax exempt, duration 5.2 years, yield is 3.44%
VG Intermediate term treasury (taxable), duration 5.1 years, yield is 2.95%
As you can see, normally tax exempt funds should yield less, but now it is yielding more than taxable treasuries. This is not even accounting for the fact that the yield is not taxable for tax exempt funds.
Obviously tax exempt funds have higher credit risk than treasuries. Also, VG's intermediate term tax exempt fund has been falling for the past few days ... not sure when will it stop falling, preventing people from jumping in. _________________ My signature has been deleted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Move out just 1.4 years further in duration for the muni fund and yield rises to 3.91%. As I recall Larry Swedroe has said 0.25% in a decent increment for 1 year duration on taxable, and even less should suffice for tax-free munis.
https://personal.vanguard.com/....IntExt=INT _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
astroturf

Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 548 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For those who believe that the markets are efficient, then the municipal bond market is not the one to give as an example. Look at this chart:
http://finance.yahoo.com/chart....=undefined
VILPX is Insured Long Term Tax Exempt; VWLTX is Long Term Tax Exempt; VITFX is Intermediate Term Treasuries (duration matches more closely the other 2 than LT Treasuries).
Muni bonds are getting dumped big time, otherwise you wouldn't see the divergence between prices in treasuries and muni bonds as shown in the chart. It happened in August, November and since January. What's happening right now is a blood bath, but most likely a buying opportunity as the markets settle down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
indexfundfan

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just read this interesting post on M*. Because of muni ARS auction failures,
| Quote: | | Muni issuers rapidly convert floating rate debt to long term and buy back their swaps; putting downward pressure on muni bond prices and upward pressure on short muni finance rates. |
As a result, we are seeing prices of the intermediate and longer term muni bonds dropping.
I speculate that as soon as all these refi are done in say a few months, prices should recover. _________________ My signature has been deleted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coyote22

Joined: 22 Jan 2008 Posts: 14 Location: Houston
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Indexfundman I hope you are right. I have some of my short-term liquid assets parked in VMLUX and it is getting killed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larryswedroe
Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 5368 Location: St Louis MO
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is DFA's rule that 20bp per annum they like to see to extend
For munis obviously less needed, |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larryswedroe
Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 5368 Location: St Louis MO
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| btw-another reason to buy munis (Edited for political content). That should result in munis trading at lower percentage of treasuries |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paladin
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 933 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| larryswedroe wrote: | | btw-another reason to buy munis (Edited for political content) That should result in munis trading at lower percentage of treasuries |
Larry,
Can you explain why the prices of Vanguard's muni funds are dropping? CA IT TE is down 4% in the last 4 weeks? Yields hardly changed.
Is this the time to TLH?
- Paladin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larryswedroe
Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 5368 Location: St Louis MO
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dont know why Vanguard's funds are down. Yields are up from month ago, but not much. And down from six months ago, quite a bit.
Perhaps they bought lots of bonds with poor underlying credits that were enhanced by insurance? No idea, just guessing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2814
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| larryswedroe wrote: | Dont know why Vanguard's funds are down. Yields are up from month ago, but not much. And down from six months ago, quite a bit.
Perhaps they bought lots of bonds with poor underlying credits that were enhanced by insurance? No idea, just guessing. |
Vanguard Long Term Tax Exempt is in the middle of its category YTD.
http://quicktake.morningstar.c....mbol=VWLTX
53rd percentile ytd and 31 percentile over past year.
So whatever is going on is not specific to Vanguard I think.
One defining characteristic of Vanguard is that they have little to no AMT bond exposure in all but one or two of their funds. So perhaps that has something to do with it.
cheers
grok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale_G

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 796 Location: central Florida - on the mature side of 65
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All muni funds are down, there is nothing special going on at Vanguard.
During the August swoon, hedge funds and institutions allegedly dumped muni's for liquidity purposes because the couldn't sell their real junk at any price. We may be seeing some more of the same.
On January 2nd I booked a tax loss on Vanguard's Hi Yield Muni and exchanged into Vanguard's FL LT Muni. Depending on how Vanguard counts 60 days, I will be exchanging the FL Muni to Hi Yield to book another tax loss on March 2nd or 3rd.
I'll also add a little more dough.
If I were a speculator I would be going long additional muni's and shorting treasuries.
This too shall pass.
Dale _________________ first we crawl, then we walk, then we run, later we use any available transportation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sscritic
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 2629
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vallejo California is about to declare bankruptcy. One municipal bankruptcy in California causes the sheep to sell California municipal bonds. Other sheep sell bonds from other states in reaction.
An efficient market can still be ruled by fear. The price of municipal bonds incorporates all the available information and fear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matt
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 914
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Larry Swedroe wrote:
| Quote: | | Yields are up from month ago, but not much. |
It has been quite a substantial move, actually, as much as 60 bps on long maturities. See charts in the following link.
http://finance.yahoo.com/bonds....bond_rates |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dale -- Watch out on those muni fund trades. You need 6 months (not 60 days) for muni funds, otherwise you lose tax exemption on interest earned. I forget the complicated details, but there have been other threads about that here. Just a "heads up" to check things out more carefully! _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sscritic wrote: | Vallejo California is about to declare bankruptcy. One municipal bankruptcy in California causes the sheep to sell California municipal bonds. Other sheep sell bonds from other states in reaction.
An efficient market can still be ruled by fear. The price of municipal bonds incorporates all the available information and fear. |
I just posted that sort of scenario, along with an alternative one:
http://www.diehards.org/forum/....71e#164016
Please provide a source for your scenario! _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
duhmel1
Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 341
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sscritic wrote: | Vallejo California is about to declare bankruptcy. One municipal bankruptcy in California causes the sheep to sell California municipal bonds. Other sheep sell bonds from other states in reaction.
An efficient market can still be ruled by fear. The price of municipal bonds incorporates all the available information and fear. |
Here's the news article
The Vallejo City Council was scheduled to vote Thursday night on whether to seek bankruptcy protection while it grapples with a budget deficit caused by onerous labor contracts, a slowing economy and a rash of home foreclosures.
What's wierd is that the Vallejo bond that I own hasn't changed much in price during the turmoil. It traded yesterday at nearly par about what it has been trading at during the past year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a link. Thanks he says with some irony
http://www.kron.com/Global/story.asp?S=7931251 _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
duhmel1
Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Posts: 341
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale_G

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 796 Location: central Florida - on the mature side of 65
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ariel, the first tax loss sale was long term and no dividends were reinvested. It won't matter much on the second sale if the dividends are taxable.
Dale _________________ first we crawl, then we walk, then we run, later we use any available transportation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: Re: Deal Reached May Avoid City Of Vallejo Bankruptcy |
|
|
| Quote: | Whether or not the city files for bankruptcy, Vallejo residents are being warned about reductions in police patrols, library hours, road repairs and other services.
Many California cities are paying attention to Vallejo's plight because they're also struggling with financial problems caused by shrinking revenue and ballooning employee expenses.
"The solution that comes out for Vallejo may very well be a model for other cities facing fiscal challenges," said Marcia Fritz, vice president of the California Foundation for Fiscal Responsibility. |
A huge story in my opinion. Is the debt finally coming due on the imbalance betwee tax revenues and expenditures? How long will it take for these problems to percolate from cities to states to our federal government? _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994)
Last edited by Ariel on Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyrx

Joined: 09 Dec 2007 Posts: 306 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have a considerable amount of V. Tax-exempt Admiral (VWIUX). Today it hit a one-year low. Could this be an opportunity to add to this position? What are the downside risks? Thanks for all opinions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dale_G

Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 796 Location: central Florida - on the mature side of 65
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bobbyrx, there is always downside risk. City halls, police stations, hospitals and toll road authorities could all just send their keys to the bank. If they do so, they can forget about borrowing money in the future, but what to heck, that is after the next election.
Muni's will not yield more than treasuries for long. The gap will be closed either by treasury yields going up or muni yields going down or some combination of the two.
I will be adding to muni's, EMH or no.
Dale _________________ first we crawl, then we walk, then we run, later we use any available transportation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pointyhairedboss

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dale -- Watch out on those muni fund trades. You need 6 months (not 60 days) for muni funds, otherwise you lose tax exemption on interest earned. I forget the complicated details, but there have been other threads about that here. Just a "heads up" to check things out more carefully!
Can you explain this a little more? Is this true for all state munis? Is there a technical term for this that I can enter into a search engine to isolate the search results. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
astroturf

Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 548 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Vallejo situation is sort of "old" news and it has very little to do with the municipal bonds recent performance, which is a nation-wide situation.
For a more relevant analysis, check this thread:
http://www.diehards.org/forum/....hp?t=13644 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clay
Joined: 30 Jun 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: The Various Vanguard Muni Funds |
|
|
I pretty naive about bonds, so patience please.
What are the pros and cons of the various Vanguard muni bond funds? There is the short-term, limited term, intermediate. Thanks, C.[/img] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BostonBogle
Joined: 06 Oct 2007 Posts: 179
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 11:46 am Post subject: Municipal Bonds |
|
|
| why is now the best time to invest in municipal bonds? if it is what is the best vehicle Vanguard offers. I'm already invested rather heavily in the Mass Tax Free Fund. Is there another fund I should consider putting money in to take advantage of the "good time" to get in and help diversify a portfolio that is stock heavy and bond light. I am 56 years old. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grayfox

Joined: 15 Sep 2007 Posts: 1630 Location: Anytown, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 1:15 pm Post subject: Six Months Holding Period for Muni Fund Tax Loss |
|
|
Suppose I bought Muni fund say CA LT TE in June, added in August, December, January, February.
Then I want to tax harvest so transfer to High-Yield TE.
Is the entire tax loss disallowed because I added less than 6 months ago?
Or just the part less than 6 months old?
Does anyone know how this works? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baw703916
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 2063 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: Re: The Various Vanguard Muni Funds |
|
|
| clay wrote: | I pretty naive about bonds, so patience please.
What are the pros and cons of the various Vanguard muni bond funds? There is the short-term, limited term, intermediate. Thanks, C.[/img] |
I think that all of Vanguard's muni finds are pretty well run. That is they have low expense ratios, a conservative approach to taking on risk, and except for money market and high yield funds, have almost no AMT exposure.
The high yield fund is probably worth avoiding, especially since given the implosion of prices, you don't have to look very far to get a nice yield. Everything else is probably fine to invest in, in terms of the soundness of the portfolio.
Basically, the longer duration the fund (long-term>intermediate term>limited term>short term) the higher your yield, at the expense of more volatility in NAV. But, note that Vanguard's "long-term" muni funds are nearly identical in volatility and similar in maturity to the "intermediate term" treasury fund. So the general rule that long duration bonds aren't usually worth the risk doesn't really mean that one shouldn't buy Vanguard's long-term muni funds.
Especially, in answer to BostonBogle's question, if you have a fund specific to your state, meaning you are exempt from state as well as federal taxes. There is a California intermediate term bond fund, but the rest are all nominally long-term. Given the tax advantage, this is where I'd invest if one is available for your state (there isn't one for my state, so I just own the national bond funds and live with the state taxes).
Best wishes,
Brad _________________ I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject: Re: The Various Vanguard Muni Funds |
|
|
| baw703916 wrote: | | I think that all of Vanguard's muni finds are pretty well run. That is they have low expense ratios, a conservative approach to taking on risk, and except for money market and high yield funds, have almost no AMT exposure. |
How do you evaluate the AMT exposure? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
macdiehard
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: Re: Six Months Holding Period for Muni Fund Tax Loss |
|
|
| grayfox wrote: | Suppose I bought Muni fund say CA LT TE in June, added in August, December, January, February.
Then I want to tax harvest so transfer to High-Yield TE.
Is the entire tax loss disallowed because I added less than 6 months ago?
Or just the part less than 6 months old?
Does anyone know how this works? |
I hope someone will answer grayfox's question. I have read the several references to this but still remain confused too.
Is this to do with the wash sale rules or something else? I thought the wash sale rules for funds were that you could not deduct loses when you had bought essentially the same fund within 30 days before or after you sold shares. Are there special wash sale rules for muni funds?
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
psteinx
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 1164
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You can find AMT exposure listed on Vanguard's site, in the "Holdings" section for a given muni fund. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sammy_M

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 795
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| psteinx wrote: | | You can find AMT exposure listed on Vanguard's site, in the "Holdings" section for a given muni fund. |
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DesertDave

Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Posts: 23 Location: El Paso, TX
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| indexfundfan wrote: | Because muni's are now yielding more in nominal terms than treasury bonds, of the same duration.
...
VG Intermediate term treasury (taxable), duration 5.1 years, yield is 2.95%
...
|
Er... Vanguard's GNMA fund 0036 is now yielding 5.22%* with a duration of 2.8 years. And GNMA's are fully backed by the US government. What am I missing?
https://personal.vanguard.com/....IntExt=INT
Vanguard's Treasury Money Market Fund #0050 (VMPXX) is yielding 2.98%* on T-bills. What am I missing?
https://personal.vanguard.com/....IntExt=INT
(*Note, these are not todays numbers.) _________________ TANSTAAFL
"There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch."
-- Robert A. Heinlein The Moon is a Harsh Mistress |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baw703916
Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 2063 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Desert Dave,
Government agencies bonds aren't really backed by the same guarantee as treasuries, so they nearly always trade at a yield premium. Especially now, when there's a big flight to safety going on.
Best wishes,
Brad _________________ I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dbr
Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 4069
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: Re: Six Months Holding Period for Muni Fund Tax Loss |
|
|
| macdiehard wrote: | | grayfox wrote: | Suppose I bought Muni fund say CA LT TE in June, added in August, December, January, February.
Then I want to tax harvest so transfer to High-Yield TE.
Is the entire tax loss disallowed because I added less than 6 months ago?
Or just the part less than 6 months old?
Does anyone know how this works? |
I hope someone will answer grayfox's question. I have read the several references to this but still remain confused too.
Is this to do with the wash sale rules or something else? I thought the wash sale rules for funds were that you could not deduct loses when you had bought essentially the same fund within 30 days before or after you sold shares. Are there special wash sale rules for muni funds?
Thanks. |
Is there any possibility the following from this site explains what is at question here (http://www.pc1040.com/acctingnews.asp?NewsId=90):
[Municipal bond funds.] If you are looking for diversity and professional management for your municipal bond holdings, you may want to consider buying shares of a mutual fund that invests in tax-exempt municipal bonds. These funds may be broadly based or targeted to the bonds of a particular state. Some "high yield" (junk-bond) municipal bond funds are also available. A fund that's invested at least 50% in tax-exempt obligations may distribute exempt-interest dividends to its investors. These dividends are treated essentially the same as municipal bond interest. To preclude a potential tax loophole, if an investor buys mutual fund shares, receives an exempt-interest dividend, and then sells the shares at a loss within six months after the purchase, the loss is disallowed to the extent of the exempt-interest dividend. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DesertDave

Joined: 22 Sep 2007 Posts: 23 Location: El Paso, TX
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baw703916 wrote: | Hi Desert Dave,
Government agencies bonds aren't really backed by the same guarantee as treasuries, so they nearly always trade at a yield premium. Especially now, when there's a big flight to safety going on.
Best wishes,
Brad | OK, maybe I didn't phrase my question very well. What flummoxes me is why anyone would invest in the municipal bonds of a city, state or school district at rates around 2.95% when federal government backed investments are paying 2.98% to 5.22%.
Surely the fed backed interments are safer if for no other reason than the feds can print the money to pay them off. _________________ TANSTAAFL
"There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch."
-- Robert A. Heinlein The Moon is a Harsh Mistress |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paladin
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 933 Location: California
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DesertDave wrote: | | baw703916 wrote: | Hi Desert Dave,
Government agencies bonds aren't really backed by the same guarantee as treasuries, so they nearly always trade at a yield premium. Especially now, when there's a big flight to safety going on.
Best wishes,
Brad | OK, maybe I didn't phrase my question very well. What flummoxes me is why anyone would invest in the municipal bonds of a city, state or school district at rates around 2.95% when federal government backed investments are paying 2.98% to 5.22%.
Surely the fed backed interments are safer if for no other reason than the feds can print the money to pay them off. |
One reason is federal and state taxes DesertDave.
- Paladin |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|