 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
am
Joined: 30 Sep 2007 Posts: 559 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: municipal bond market? |
|
|
| Not sure why munis have been doing so poorly. Today for example taxable bonds increased in price but munis are down again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gassert
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When there is uncertainlty in the market and invesotrs as a whole are seeking safety, then they move to governament bonds becausd they are considered a "risk free" investment. Munis are obviously safe, but still considered riskier. For the main street investor munis and govt bonds are equally as safe, so you may not act the same way as the market, but from a broad view this is the reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mvm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you believe that munis are being unfairly valued because of fear, then this is a time to buy.
many experts think this is so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jh
Joined: 14 May 2007 Posts: 1319
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...
Last edited by jh on Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
am
Joined: 30 Sep 2007 Posts: 559 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks to all who replied. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobcat2
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 1936
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: Link to threads on Auction-Rate Securities resets |
|
|
Here is a link to the threads on Auction-Rate Securities resets.
Link:http://www.diehards.org/forum/....00dff954a9
Bob K _________________ The real difficulty in changing any enterprise lies not in developing new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones. - JM Keynes
Good questions outrank easy answers. - PA Samuelson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DaveS
Joined: 15 Jun 2007 Posts: 650 Location: Reno, NV
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I agree with the folks who say that this is a buying opportunity. Basically muni bonds in some way finance every high school, sewage system, etc. in the country. There is no way the system is going to be alowed to self destruct. The problem, which is temporary, is that some of the folks who insure munis from smaller issuers, such as a high school in a small county somewhere, also insured subprime mortgage bond issuers. After the system sorts out the impact of those idiodic investments, things should return to normal. The default rate in munis is so low that one hesitates in using the word risk to describe them. Dave |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
malloc
Joined: 01 Dec 2007 Posts: 341
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:
| Quote: | | In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stratton

Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 8153 Location: Puget Sound
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| malloc wrote: | The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:
| Quote: | | In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value. |
|
I've seen other articles which claim the insurance agencies only have to make the yield premium payments until the bond is due.
This appears to be more complex than any one article covers. Any perusal of one the Fabozzi books shows a lot of different types of munis.
Paul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valuethinker
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 13357
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stratton wrote: | | malloc wrote: | The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:
| Quote: | | In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value. |
|
I've seen other articles which claim the insurance agencies only have to make the yield premium payments until the bond is due.
This appears to be more complex than any one article covers. Any perusal of one the Fabozzi books shows a lot of different types of munis.
Paul |
Piece in the Guardian yesterday about the Las Vegas monorail.
Apparently this one is likely to be the first AAA municipal default of this cycle.
www.guardian.co.uk/business/20....tworkfront
How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me.
The article mentions that they have a contingency fund to pull it down. This would be a complete tragedy, akin to New York pulling down the 2nd Avenue El train. 60 years later, the tragedy still rings. I'm sure 20 years from now, Las Vegas will need this system, even if it does not, now.
http://www.thethirdrail.net/0107/cohen1.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valuethinker
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 13357
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DaveS wrote: | | I agree with the folks who say that this is a buying opportunity. Basically muni bonds in some way finance every high school, sewage system, etc. in the country. There is no way the system is going to be alowed to self destruct. The problem, which is temporary, is that some of the folks who insure munis from smaller issuers, such as a high school in a small county somewhere, also insured subprime mortgage bond issuers. After the system sorts out the impact of those idiodic investments, things should return to normal. The default rate in munis is so low that one hesitates in using the word risk to describe them. Dave |
Some muni bonds (eg economic development bonds) have much higher default rate experience, particularly in a recession. There is the whole question of natural AAA and AA vs. insured ratings.
See my post above (below) re the Las Vegas monorail.
Natural AAAs are likely to be OK, in strong counties with sound finance. But remembering what happened to Orange County, it's not always easy to see which those are: you can't think of a place which, in principle, was more blessed economically than Orange County.
Larry Swedroe has had quite a few good commentaries about muni defaults, here and in (I presume) his books. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
larryswedroe
Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 5419 Location: St Louis MO
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Value thinker
BTW-even in Orange county situation the investors were EVENTUALLY paid back. A municipality simply cannot afford to have its credit raising ability wiped out--so they will go to almost any length to keep it.
That is why the default rates on GO bonds of high quality is so low, almost zero. A single A muni is 10x less likely to default than single A corporate for example.
The key is to make sure the UNDERLYING rating is strong, as I have always warned investors--never make the mistake of treating the unlikely as impossible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baw703916

Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 2409 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Valuethinker wrote: | | How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me. |
A little bit OT, but funding just fell through on a proposal to extend the DC Metro to Dulles Airport (it does go to National Airport). Go figure.
Back to topic, I'm trying to get my head around the failed auctions of this week. So, the underlying securities aren't really at a fixed rate after all? Who owns these things? The articles have mentioned several closed end funds, etc. Do Tax-exempt money market funds also own them? It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.
Best wishes,
Brad _________________ I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Valuethinker
Joined: 11 May 2007 Posts: 13357
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baw703916 wrote: | | Valuethinker wrote: | | How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me. |
A little bit OT, but funding just fell through on a proposal to extend the DC Metro to Dulles Airport (it does go to National Airport). Go figure.
Back to topic, I'm trying to get my head around the failed auctions of this week. So, the underlying securities aren't really at a fixed rate after all? Who owns these things? The articles have mentioned several closed end funds, etc. Do Tax-exempt money market funds also own them? It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.
Best wishes,
Brad |
I really haven't been tracking this one (I probably should). It's just another case of the worms coming out of the woodwork, in a generalised credit crunch.
Keep an eye on Commercial Mortgages, an area of significant pain to come I think. That and LBO loans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
astroturf

Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 548 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baw703916 wrote: | It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.
Best wishes,
Brad |
It was a failed auction. The investor who got stuck with the securities now can't get his principal back. Yes, he gets a very high rate while waiting for another auction or getting the bonds called by the issuer who would refinance. These auction-rate securities were sold by insinuating they were as good as cash but with a higher yield, even though they were risky derivatives. The monoline debacle has precipitated the failed auctions in the municipal bond segment of auction-rate securities. This has also caused many tax exempt money market funds to drop in yield like a rock, as investors are out of the auction-rate securities game and must buy short-term municipal bonds directly to meet their needs. More demand for those short-term bonds, lower yields.
Bottom line, Brad can't buy that 20% yield if he cares about recovering his principal in a very short time, as was intended by the use of those securities. In this environment who would risk not recovering their principal again? Auction-rate securities is a frozen market right now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baw703916

Joined: 01 Apr 2007 Posts: 2409 Location: Northern Virginia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| astroturf wrote: | | Brad can't buy that 20% yield if he cares about recovering his principal in a very short time |
Well, if I can get a 20% yield with a lot less risk than equities would have, I'm happy to wait a loooong time to get my principle back! Lol!
Seriously though, thanks for the explanation.
Best wishes,
Brad _________________ I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|