Bogleheads Home Bogleheads
Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
 
  WikiWiki    FAQFAQ    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

municipal bond market?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Help with Personal Investments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
am



Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 559
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject: municipal bond market? Reply with quote

Not sure why munis have been doing so poorly. Today for example taxable bonds increased in price but munis are down again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gassert



Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 178

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When there is uncertainlty in the market and invesotrs as a whole are seeking safety, then they move to governament bonds becausd they are considered a "risk free" investment. Munis are obviously safe, but still considered riskier. For the main street investor munis and govt bonds are equally as safe, so you may not act the same way as the market, but from a broad view this is the reason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mvm



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if you believe that munis are being unfairly valued because of fear, then this is a time to buy.

many experts think this is so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jh



Joined: 14 May 2007
Posts: 1319

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by jh on Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
am



Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 559
Location: Illinois

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to all who replied.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobcat2



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 1936

PostPosted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:01 pm    Post subject: Link to threads on Auction-Rate Securities resets Reply with quote

Here is a link to the threads on Auction-Rate Securities resets.
Link:http://www.diehards.org/forum/....00dff954a9

Bob K
_________________
The real difficulty in changing any enterprise lies not in developing new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones. - JM Keynes
Good questions outrank easy answers. - PA Samuelson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DaveS



Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 650
Location: Reno, NV

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with the folks who say that this is a buying opportunity. Basically muni bonds in some way finance every high school, sewage system, etc. in the country. There is no way the system is going to be alowed to self destruct. The problem, which is temporary, is that some of the folks who insure munis from smaller issuers, such as a high school in a small county somewhere, also insured subprime mortgage bond issuers. After the system sorts out the impact of those idiodic investments, things should return to normal. The default rate in munis is so low that one hesitates in using the word risk to describe them. Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
malloc



Joined: 01 Dec 2007
Posts: 341

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:

Quote:
In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stratton



Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 8153
Location: Puget Sound

PostPosted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

malloc wrote:
The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:

Quote:
In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value.

I've seen other articles which claim the insurance agencies only have to make the yield premium payments until the bond is due.

This appears to be more complex than any one article covers. Any perusal of one the Fabozzi books shows a lot of different types of munis.

Paul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 13357

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stratton wrote:
malloc wrote:
The bond insurers are stressed because of exposure to CDO's. If the insurers are downgraded, the muni's which they insure may well have a problem. To quote John Markman at MSNBC today:

Quote:
In many cases, munis are sold as part of "tender option bond," or "put bond," derivatives. In these programs, which became very popular among hedge funds in this decade because their low risk profiles permitted a lot of leveraging, a bond could be tendered back to the issuer if any of a variety of troublesome events triggered, ranging in severity from a default to a ratings downgrade. The programs required the issuer to buy the bonds back at par, or face value.

I've seen other articles which claim the insurance agencies only have to make the yield premium payments until the bond is due.

This appears to be more complex than any one article covers. Any perusal of one the Fabozzi books shows a lot of different types of munis.

Paul


Piece in the Guardian yesterday about the Las Vegas monorail.

Apparently this one is likely to be the first AAA municipal default of this cycle.

www.guardian.co.uk/business/20....tworkfront

How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me.

The article mentions that they have a contingency fund to pull it down. This would be a complete tragedy, akin to New York pulling down the 2nd Avenue El train. 60 years later, the tragedy still rings. I'm sure 20 years from now, Las Vegas will need this system, even if it does not, now.

http://www.thethirdrail.net/0107/cohen1.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 13357

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DaveS wrote:
I agree with the folks who say that this is a buying opportunity. Basically muni bonds in some way finance every high school, sewage system, etc. in the country. There is no way the system is going to be alowed to self destruct. The problem, which is temporary, is that some of the folks who insure munis from smaller issuers, such as a high school in a small county somewhere, also insured subprime mortgage bond issuers. After the system sorts out the impact of those idiodic investments, things should return to normal. The default rate in munis is so low that one hesitates in using the word risk to describe them. Dave


Some muni bonds (eg economic development bonds) have much higher default rate experience, particularly in a recession. There is the whole question of natural AAA and AA vs. insured ratings.

See my post above (below) re the Las Vegas monorail.

Natural AAAs are likely to be OK, in strong counties with sound finance. But remembering what happened to Orange County, it's not always easy to see which those are: you can't think of a place which, in principle, was more blessed economically than Orange County.

Larry Swedroe has had quite a few good commentaries about muni defaults, here and in (I presume) his books.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryswedroe



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 5419
Location: St Louis MO

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Value thinker

BTW-even in Orange county situation the investors were EVENTUALLY paid back. A municipality simply cannot afford to have its credit raising ability wiped out--so they will go to almost any length to keep it.

That is why the default rates on GO bonds of high quality is so low, almost zero. A single A muni is 10x less likely to default than single A corporate for example.

The key is to make sure the UNDERLYING rating is strong, as I have always warned investors--never make the mistake of treating the unlikely as impossible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baw703916



Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 2409
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Valuethinker wrote:
How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me.


A little bit OT, but funding just fell through on a proposal to extend the DC Metro to Dulles Airport (it does go to National Airport). Go figure. Rolling Eyes

Back to topic, I'm trying to get my head around the failed auctions of this week. So, the underlying securities aren't really at a fixed rate after all? Who owns these things? The articles have mentioned several closed end funds, etc. Do Tax-exempt money market funds also own them? It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.

Best wishes,
Brad
_________________
I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Valuethinker



Joined: 11 May 2007
Posts: 13357

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baw703916 wrote:
Valuethinker wrote:
How anyone could build a light rail system that doesn't connect to the Airport, in a tourism-driven city, escapes me.


A little bit OT, but funding just fell through on a proposal to extend the DC Metro to Dulles Airport (it does go to National Airport). Go figure. Rolling Eyes

Back to topic, I'm trying to get my head around the failed auctions of this week. So, the underlying securities aren't really at a fixed rate after all? Who owns these things? The articles have mentioned several closed end funds, etc. Do Tax-exempt money market funds also own them? It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.

Best wishes,
Brad


I really haven't been tracking this one (I probably should). It's just another case of the worms coming out of the woodwork, in a generalised credit crunch.

Keep an eye on Commercial Mortgages, an area of significant pain to come I think. That and LBO loans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
astroturf



Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 548
Location: Greater NYC Area

PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baw703916 wrote:
It seems like, in the case of the NY/NJ Port authority bonds that ended up with an interest rate ot 20% due to a failed option, that pretty much fits my definition of a buying opportunity.

Best wishes,
Brad


It was a failed auction. The investor who got stuck with the securities now can't get his principal back. Yes, he gets a very high rate while waiting for another auction or getting the bonds called by the issuer who would refinance. These auction-rate securities were sold by insinuating they were as good as cash but with a higher yield, even though they were risky derivatives. The monoline debacle has precipitated the failed auctions in the municipal bond segment of auction-rate securities. This has also caused many tax exempt money market funds to drop in yield like a rock, as investors are out of the auction-rate securities game and must buy short-term municipal bonds directly to meet their needs. More demand for those short-term bonds, lower yields.

Bottom line, Brad can't buy that 20% yield if he cares about recovering his principal in a very short time, as was intended by the use of those securities. In this environment who would risk not recovering their principal again? Auction-rate securities is a frozen market right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baw703916



Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 2409
Location: Northern Virginia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

astroturf wrote:
Brad can't buy that 20% yield if he cares about recovering his principal in a very short time


Well, if I can get a 20% yield with a lot less risk than equities would have, I'm happy to wait a loooong time to get my principle back! Lol!

Seriously though, thanks for the explanation.

Best wishes,
Brad
_________________
I don't foresee any Black Swans appearing in the future
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Help with Personal Investments All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group