 |
Bogleheads Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ddb

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 3654 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:39 pm Post subject: Market timing thread: what looks attractive today? |
|
|
Please note that I am a firm believer that financial markets cannot be accurately predicted, and further note that I am in no way suggesting that I would ever alter my short- or long-term asset allocation based any asset class forecasts that I can come up with. This thread is solely for entertainment purposes.
Having said all that...
What asset classes look attractive today? From a valuation standpoint and/or a reversion-to-the-mean standpoint and/or a yield standpoint, nothing seems to look very good!
US Stocks: valuations don't seem too out-of-line compared to historical norms, however profit margins are at very high levels. All-in-all, this is probably what I view as the least unattractive equity asset class.
Foreign Developed-Market stocks: recent (5 years or so) heavy outperformance compared to US stocks, but outperformance is largely due to the decline of the dollar. What do valuations look like in this market, compared to historical levels? I suspect that the valuation story is similar to US stocks. BUT, with the dollar at such a low level relative to other currencies, the asset class looks a little frightening if you believe that the dollar will rise back to a more "normal" level.
Emerging Market stocks: very strong recent (5 year) performance. Is this market in a bubble, and will the bubble burst?
Commodities: very high recent performance.
REITs: even despite recent downturn, 5-year performance numbers are still huge.
US Gov't Bonds: yields are very low compared to historical norms. If you believe that the expected return of a bond equals its current YTM, then I guess we can expect short-to-intermediate term government bonds to return around 3% per year over the next 10 years.
Inv-Grade Corporate Bonds: nice spreads compared to treasuries. If you think that investment-grade corporates won't default more than usual over the next few years, then it looks much more attractive than government bonds. Consider that the Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Fund (VFSTX) has a yield of around 4.5%, while the Short-Term Treasury Fund (VFISX) has a yield of around 2.26% (per Vanguard website). The two funds have similar durations (2.3 and 2.1, respectively). Treasuries should have lower yields due to lower risk of default and not being state-income taxable, but this spread seems attractive even after considering those issues.
High-Yield Bonds: spreads very attractive. Even the relatively conservative Vanguard High-Yield fund (VWEHX) is yielding around 8.5%, with a duration of 5.1. There's clearly a tremendous amount of uncertainty priced into these securities, which seems to be well-warranted. For various tax, risk, and correlation reasons, I see no compelling reasons to utilize this asset class, even at these high yields.
Cash: can still get 4%-or-more CDs at some places, and money markets can be found at around 4%. Looks attractive relative to government bonds, but not necessarily compared to corporate bonds.
Conclusion? I like investment-grade corporate bonds, cash, and large-cap US stocks as the top performers over the next 1-2 years. But even those three asset classes don't look very interesting to me. Seems weird that there is no asset class out there that looks way undervalued (except maybe investment-grade corporates). We're coming off a five-year period where EVERYTHING has had solid returns.
- DDB _________________ "There is a moment of sheer panic when I realize that Paul's apartment overlooks the park, and is obviously more expensive than mine. " - PB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cato

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 229 Location: Portola Valley, CA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I were a betting man.......Some narrow categories I would consider are:
* MLPs -- TPP, BPL, EEP. These offer good tax-deferred yields, which could be good haven if the 15% qualified dividend tax treatment is changed. If you own index funds, this is an asset class you might want to add, since they are omitted from virtually all the indexes.
* Pharmaceuticals -- GSK, PFE, BMY, NVS. These have had the tar beat out of them in the last few years. For example, PFE has a $30billion cash hoard and is yielding nearly 6%. PFE has steadily increased their dividends now for the last 10 years.
* Canroys -- PWE, HTE, ERF, PGH. These have recently rallied, but the average yield for this group is still over 14%.
Do I know something the market doesn't? Probably not. Except maybe that I can borrow money from Fido at 4.25% and buy some stocks that yield a lot more than that.
-cato _________________ Citigroup delenda est. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joepvang
Joined: 03 Feb 2008 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe REITs and Large Cap and Small Cap US equities will perform pretty well in the next 2-3 years. _________________ Time is money. Timing isn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Russell

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 275 Location: on the Chesapeake Bay
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, I'll bite!
Precious metal equities look pretty nice right now.
Consider the following rather rough measure for valuation: just take the price of these stocks (perhaps measured by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver index: the XAU) divided by the price of gold (GLD). It's pretty close to the low end of the historical range at present.... _________________ The best material model for a cat is another, or preferably the same, cat. - A. Rosenblueth and N. Wiener (1945). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Unormal

Joined: 20 Nov 2007 Posts: 302 Location: the middle
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Russell wrote: | OK, I'll bite!
Precious metal equities look pretty nice right now.
Consider the following rather rough measure for valuation: just take the price of these stocks (perhaps measured by the Philadelphia Gold and Silver index: the XAU) divided by the price of gold (GLD). It's pretty close to the low end of the historical range at present.... |
Is there any data mining site that lets you look at these things without rolling your own spreadsheets and reports? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bolt
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 871 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[removed at request of poster]
Last edited by bolt on Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:59 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rich
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(I also posted this in another string.)
Developed foreign. Check out 12.73 Trailing P/E and 1.95 P/B on World ex US (which also excludes emerging markets).
http://www.globalindices.stand....rp=returns _________________ Best regards,
Rich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ariel

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1361
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great thread, DDB. For what it's worth, I agree all around with your original analysis. _________________ Do what you will, the capital is at hazard ... - Justice Samuel Putnam (1830), as quoted by John Bogle (1994) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
EmergDoc

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 5474 Location: Home sweet home
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you trust those P/Es and P/Bs? Aren't accounting standards different in different countries? _________________ 1) Invest you must 2) Time is your friend 3) Impulse is your enemy
4) Basic arithmetic works 5) Stick to simplicity 6) Stay the course |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woof755

Joined: 05 Aug 2007 Posts: 1981 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FTSE all world ex- US does include emerging markets. (or did I misunderstand your post?) _________________ "By singing in harmony from the same page of the same investing hymnal, the Diehards drown out market noise."
--Jason Zweig, quoted in The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bolt
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 871 Location: Boston
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| [removed at request of poster] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tfb

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 3215
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:08 am Post subject: Re: Market timing thread: what looks attractive today? |
|
|
| ddb wrote: | | Conclusion? I like investment-grade corporate bonds, cash, and large-cap US stocks as the top performers over the next 1-2 years. But even those three asset classes don't look very interesting to me. Seems weird that there is no asset class out there that looks way undervalued (except maybe investment-grade corporates). We're coming off a five-year period where EVERYTHING has had solid returns. |
There shouldn't be asset classes that are way undervalued. I expect things are fairly valued most of the time. That's the function of the market -- opinions converge to a price at which neither buyers nor sellers feel cheated. _________________ Did you search the forums and the wiki?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BPet
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cato wrote: | | Except maybe that I can borrow money from Fido at 4.25% and buy some stocks that yield a lot more than that.-cato |
What is fido? Borrowing at 4.25% seems interesting, especially if you have an ultra long time horizon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ddb

Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 3654 Location: Manhattan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: Re: Market timing thread: what looks attractive today? |
|
|
| tfb wrote: | | There shouldn't be asset classes that are way undervalued. I expect things are fairly valued most of the time. That's the function of the market -- opinions converge to a price at which neither buyers nor sellers feel cheated. |
Yes, I agree! However, I'm commenting more on the perception of valuations. I realize that even if something looks undervalued, it's probably efficiently priced. But there's nothing out there right now where we can even say, "this asset class has really underperformed lately" or "the fundamentals of this asset class make it look pretty attractive now".
As mentioned earlier, I don't think any such information should be used to change target allocatoins. Just trying to promote a useless discussion about what looks attractive!
- DDB _________________ "There is a moment of sheer panic when I realize that Paul's apartment overlooks the park, and is obviously more expensive than mine. " - PB |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retired at 48
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 1726 Location: Saratoga NY; Port Saint Lucie, FL
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please Forgive the John Belushi, ANIMAL HOUSE theme here, as the following was my response post on the M* diehard site posting titled "I am so depressed".
I'm sorry, but I visualize certain diehards sitting around moping, when two of perhaps the greatest opportunities are staring them in the face, but with their melancholy they don't see it. Bad market times are exactly what the doctor ordered...opportunities. Oh, I sensed some movement, a few heads perking up. Oh, one of you had the courage to ask, what is even one of these once in a lifetime opportunities. OK, let's talk.
First, when you drive into any town in the USA, there are two things you always see...a church steeple, and the downtown bank. Right in front of your eyes are one of the greatest bloodbaths underway that will crucify financial stocks, especially banks. Down 50% already, perhaps more to come.
But let's stop and think. Oh, the banks competition, those pesky mortgage financials, are going bankrupt and out of business. Gee, in five years if you want a mortgage, who do you go to...banks, and fully on their terms. I see some more heads perking up! Yes, now you're getting it. Oh, and we have been told to buy "value". Who has very high dividend yields, low price to book, low PE's and yet WILL ABSOLUTELY NOT GO OUT OF BUSINESS; Yes, banks! The US simply will not be run without a banking system. What a better play. Oh, is that more heads I see popping up...not sure. Of course, we may see dividend cuts, more writeoffs, typically the best time to become a "banker" owning stocks. And that pesky inverted yield curve just stays flat, so banks find it difficult to make money. Did you know a good dose of inflation that all you guys are moping about is exactly what is needed to highly slope the yield curve! Yes, banks are the only people whose business of making money is to make money. They will survive any inflation. In five years I visualize the bank managers back to their 3-6-3 plan,. That is, borrow at 3%, loan out at 6% and on the golf course by 3pm!
Come on guys, get fully perked up and monitor this bank meltdown. How can I become a banker, you ask. Follow the ETF's KBE (large banks) and KRE (Small banks), or the broader XLF. . To take full advantage, you may have to deviate a little from diehard philosophies, by:
Consider banks as an asset class. Or, consider you are rebalancing within the S&P 500 asset class!
If you get to making money in bank ETF's, don't asset allocate out for awhile. Rather, stay with it at least five years. If you're right, BE RIGHT BIG!
And when the blue suiters (Merrill Lynches of the world) finally conclude banks are safe to invest in (probably 7 years), then hand your shares back to them, say thanks, and get out! And walk merrily down the street in your banker's tophat. And when you toast the champaign, please think of old diehard, retired at 48.
Now what do you say guys, LET'S GO GET EM!!
Oh, you asked what is the second opportunity of a lifetime staring you in the face...standby for part 2 if this part is viewed positively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rose21
Joined: 27 Jul 2007 Posts: 478
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm with you on the financials. Buffet's vulturistic move to cherry-pick the monolines is a revealing commentary on what's just around the corner. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cato

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 229 Location: Portola Valley, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BPet wrote: | | cato wrote: | | Except maybe that I can borrow money from Fido at 4.25% and buy some stocks that yield a lot more than that.-cato |
What is fido? Borrowing at 4.25% seems interesting, especially if you have an ultra long time horizon. |
That's Fidelity, the broker. You do have to borrow $500k or more. However, I have put most of that $500k into a MM fund that yields.....4.25%.
-cato _________________ Citigroup delenda est. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tramper Al
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2650
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cato wrote: | Except maybe that I can borrow money from Fido at 4.25% and buy some stocks that yield a lot more than that.
|
Just FYI, and I posted this in its own thread, but not surprisingly no one is really interested.
The last Fed rate cut of 0.5% fully two weeks ago was not, and has not still, been passed on to Fidelity margin customers in the form of a lowering of the base margin rate. Your rate of 4.25% should be 3.75% today, and it has never taken more than a day or two for Fed rate cuts to be reflected. It has not been changed since the previous Fed cut of Jan 23rd. Do not think that Fidelity has in the past ever missed an opportunity to RAISE rates with the Fed.
You may think that 4.25% is a low rate, and it is. But Fidelity has not adjusted downward with the Fed, effectively capturing an additional 50 basis point of spread across the board. Just something to think about if committing to an "ultra long time horizon" by borrowing at a rate that is variable, not only with market interest rate fluctuations, but also at the whim of Fidelity policy makers.
Last edited by Tramper Al on Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:20 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Prokofiev

Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 585 Location: New Orleans
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: Undervalued? |
|
|
I have been buying some high dividend utility stocks as shelter from the storm. Some are near 3-5 yr lows yet can hold up in a recession since demand for their products is pretty inelastic. Also as bond and MM yields continue to fall, the 4.5% to 5.6% yield should look more and more attractive.
I bought some Con Ed (ED) which is yielding 5.5% and has just raised its dividend again. _________________ Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cato

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 229 Location: Portola Valley, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tramper Al wrote: | Just FYI, and I posted this in its own thread, but not surprisingly no one is really interested.
The last Fed rate cut of 0.5% fully two weeks ago was not, and has not still, been passed on to Fidelity margin customers in the form of a lowering of the base margin rate. Your rate of 4.25% should be 3.75% today, and it has never taken more than a day or two for Fed rate cuts to be reflected. It has not been changed since the previous Fed cut of Jan 23rd. Do not think that Fidelity has in the past ever missed an opportunity to RAISE rates with the Fed.
You may think that 4.25% is a low rate, and it is. But Fidelity has not adjusted downward with the Fed, effectively capturing an additional 50 basis point of spread across the board. Just something to think about if committing to an "ultra long time horizon" by borrowing at a rate that is variable, not only with market interest rate fluctuations, but also at the whim of Fidelity policy makers. |
Sorry Al, I should have kept up on that thread. I think they haven't lowered the rate because it was already so much lower than the market. By contrast Schwab's lowest rate is 6.45% and that requires a $2.5 Million balance.
I feel like I have a pretty safe margin of error borrowing at 4.25%, with MLPs yielding around 7%, Canroys around 14%, and Pharma 4-5%. Especially since the 4.25% is deductible, whereas the dividends are only taxed at 15% (and the MLP distributions are tax-deferred).
-cato _________________ Citigroup delenda est. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tramper Al
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2650
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cato wrote: | I think they haven't lowered the rate because it was already so much lower than the market. By contrast Schwab's lowest rate is 6.45% and that requires a $2.5 Million balance.
I feel like I have a pretty safe margin of error borrowing at 4.25% . . . |
I agree that the 4.25% rate is very competitive, and on surface one only has to look at that rate and ask if it looks good today. Still, I have no doubt that the rate Fidelity pays out on MMFs will fully reflect the new post-Fed cut rates. I would have liked a posting on the web site, an email to margin customers, or something to indicate the shift in policy. When I have called to inquire, nobody knows anything, and just says "sometimes it takes a day or two".
At the moment, I have no particular plans to reduce the amount I have borrowed from Fidelity. What I have lost, however, is the confidence that the Fidelity rate for that level of borrowing will generally slide up and down in accord with the Fed and market, as it has for a long as I have been following it. Fidelity, like any other broker, can shift gears on a dime on something like margin rates, that is their right. The average individual investor, however, may be less nimble in being able to unwind long term positions financed with short term borrowing, without substantial costs (e.g. capital gains). Such is the nature of borrowing at a variable rate, however.
And back on thread topic, I think a lot of things look cheap compared to cash. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BPet
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Regarding the Fidelity Margin Rate:
So, if you open up an account with Fidelity, will they margin positions that are not in "Fidelity Branded" mutual funds. So, if you use the Fidelity account to buy ETFs and other mutual funds...what is the margin ratio, $1M in assets, gets you how much margin?
Also, I'm not familiar with the tax deductability of Margin Interest. It it a direct deduction against income, like mortgage interest?
It seems that at rates like 4.25%, it would be very simple to make a few percent on the margin, especially if you have very long time horizon. I guess the real risk is if interest rates rise before you average compound return is greater than the 4.25%.(Like if you have a bad year or two and interest rates also rise dramatically during that time.)
Thanks for this excellent information! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rich
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 902
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| EmergDoc wrote: |
Can you trust those P/Es and P/Bs? Aren't accounting standards different in different countries? |
Good point. Don't know. Since S&P provide all the ratios in one place, I would HOPE it is apples to apples but I just don't know.
| Woof755 wrote: |
FTSE all world ex- US does include emerging markets. (or did I misunderstand your post?)
|
I'm not sure if your question is about the link I posted. If so, it is S&P not FTSE. (I think they are unrelated. Please correct me anyone if I am mistaken.)
Here is the link again:
http://www.globalindices.stand....rp=returns
To my knowledge, World Ex. U.S. excludes emerging. Global Excl. U.S. includes it. _________________ Best regards,
Rich |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cato

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 229 Location: Portola Valley, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BPet wrote: | Regarding the Fidelity Margin Rate:
So, if you open up an account with Fidelity, will they margin positions that are not in "Fidelity Branded" mutual funds. So, if you use the Fidelity account to buy ETFs and other mutual funds...what is the margin ratio, $1M in assets, gets you how much margin.
. . .
|
According to the web site, most of the ETFs I hold (VTI, VEU, etc.) say 30%. Some individual shares say 50%. Frankly, I haven't paid much attention to the requirements, because I'm not even close to reaching them.
Al's comments are well taken. I'm not going to let the margin balance get near to the amount of assets I can easily liquidate without changing strategy. Obviously, the MM fund can be liquidated instantly. The overall returns on the other holdings should be mostly distributions and not gains, so I wouldn't be forced to take a gain on them.
But getting back to the original topic...... my point was that you can get a pretty safe return right now that vastly exceeds the cost of short-term money.
-cato _________________ Citigroup delenda est. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Les

Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1565 Location: Northern Calif.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| retired at 48 wrote: | | Of course, we may see dividend cuts, more writeoffs, typically the best time to become a "banker" owning stocks. And that pesky inverted yield curve just stays flat, so banks find it difficult to make money. Did you know a good dose of inflation that all you guys are moping about is exactly what is needed to highly slope the yield curve! |
It does feel a little like there is blood running in the streets. So how much of those high dividends are for real? I notice Bank of America is at 6.1% and Wells Fargo is 4.1%.
Ret48, I'm puzzled by your comment about the yield curve. It's not flat with 2yr treasuries at 1.93% and 10yr at 3.66%. Also the 5yr treasury minus 5yr TIPS (about 2.3%) are not predicting big inflation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retired at 48
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 1726 Location: Saratoga NY; Port Saint Lucie, FL
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Les"] | retired at 48 wrote: | | Of course, we may see dividend cuts, more writeoffs, typically the best time to become a "banker" owning stocks. And that pesky inverted yield curve just stays flat, so banks find it difficult to make money. Did you know a good dose of inflation that all you guys are moping about is exactly what is needed to highly slope the yield curve! |
Les wrote
It does feel a little like there is blood running in the streets. So how much of those high dividends are for real? I notice Bank of America is at 6.1% and Wells Fargo is 4.1%.
Reply: Currently, it's real. If you go to Yahoo finance and enter/click on KRE or KBE you see about a 6% yield on ETF. But As I stated, this will probably not hold, as banks will cut dividends. When these div. cuts are made, it is usually a good time to start accumulating shares.
Les also wrote
Ret48, I'm puzzled by your comment about the yield curve. It's not flat with 2yr treasuries at 1.93% and 10yr at 3.66%. Also the 5yr treasury minus 5yr TIPS (about 2.3%) are not predicting big inflation.
Reply: This is a highly complex topic to be brief. But I feel we are in an unusual low rate time where fed drops short way down, enabling banks to have some kind a spread (And make money) as they plow through the subprime situation. There is also a numbers problem as rates approach zero. A 1.93% vs 3.66% indeed is a small sloped yield curve, but we almost intuitively feel that 3.6%, 10 yr cannot be sustained with any good whiff of inflation. The bond losses could be huge when rates go up.
The inflation comes from an (as yet undetected by most people) foreign countries, driven mostly by China. China reportedly has 10% ,and rising, inflation. It has a built in annual currency exchange devaluatiion of US dollar built in (6-8%%), and as China now controls 100% of many manuf. mkts, after the olympics expect to see (or now) that their leaders want to have a real increase in the people's wages. Why not, they don't want to be economic slaves for the world. Let's say 5-10% real wage increase. This means our Chinese imports start going up in price, increasing each year, to large increases.
Banks in the long run will clearly adjust to whatever dollars buy, because it's business is as money changer. In regular times yield curves work their way back to sloped. If people lose money due to inflation, eg a 3.6% yield and 6% inflation, they will take their money elsewhere, such as abroad, or into high dividend stocks. But eventually the yield curve will return to normal, at much higher rates that now. OTOH I could be completely wrong...just historical surmising. Early this century yields were typically 1% on LT treasuries, when money was backed by gold and silver. Who knows haw badly currencies can be inflated now, everywhere, with no real currency backing. Almost an experiment.
Guess I've ramble on a little. Better stop. Good to talk to you again Les.
Retired at 48 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tramper Al
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2650
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BPet wrote: | Also, I'm not familiar with the tax deductability of Margin Interest. It it a direct deduction against income, like mortgage interest?
|
To my understanding and in my experience, it goes like this. If you itemize, investment interest expense is deductible to the extent that you have investment income (interest, dividends). I have been in AMT for years, and this deduction is not lost under AMT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
market timer

Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 2729 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| There are other ways to borrow at 4.25% or less. I don't itemize deductions or have $500K in marginable securities, but that doesn't stop me from borrowing at those low, tax deductible interest rates. Futures allow you to borrow at the risk free rate. Since the interest is built into the price, the interest expense is automatically deducted from capital gains. The same is true for options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BPet
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 48
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| market timer wrote: | | There are other ways to borrow at 4.25% or less. I don't itemize deductions or have $500K in marginable securities, but that doesn't stop me from borrowing at those low, tax deductible interest rates. Futures allow you to borrow at the risk free rate. Since the interest is built into the price, the interest expense is automatically deducted from capital gains. The same is true for options. |
I don't know enough abuot options or futures, but it seems to me that they would require that you are betting that the market goes up within a specified time frame. Is that correct?
I was thinking more on the lines of taking something like $500K and spreading it out along the normal asset allocation. If you have a long enough time horizon(20yrs+), then with an equity biases AA (maybe 80/20), it should be very likely that you would beat the 4.25% rate(or even if it went up to 6%) over the long time horizon. And, if its spread in the same manner as the rest of the AA, it would be easy to sell a specified percentage of each fund in the event that interest rates spiked(maybe above 7% or so). As long as you held the 500K for a year, your gains would be Long Term an so tax would be minimized. So, if over a long time period, you could pick up a few % on the $500K, that would serve to add to the compound return of the total portfolio.
It seems that, given a long time horizon, this would be a low risk strategy(even though on face value, leveraging may seem high risk). I would love to hear more opinions on this strategy to put a little boost in the long term return of a diversified portfolio. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
market timer

Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 2729 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BPet wrote: | | I don't know enough abuot options or futures, but it seems to me that they would require that you are betting that the market goes up within a specified time frame. Is that correct? |
Yes, futures and options have expiration dates, ranging from this Friday to three years in the future. To maintain a position for the long term, you'll need to roll out your position periodically. I use S&P eMinis, which pay out 5x the value of the S&P index, and roll out my positions quarterly. This means realizing losses and gains every three months. For someone accumulating shares and using tax loss harvesting, it should be easy to offset gains from futures with realized losses from shares.
I'd prefer a margin loan at the same after-tax interest rate, but I just don't have access to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Random Musings

Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 1715 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rose21 said:
| Quote: | | I'm with you on the financials. Buffet's vulturistic move to cherry-pick the monolines is a revealing commentary on what's just around the corner. |
Yes, Buffet is being a vulture, but on a very specific level. From what I've seen and read, looks like he's going to cherry-pick the best debt in the monolines (mostly muni's) and let the monolines drown with the rest. I think at least one of the monolines will declare bankruptcy before it is all over (unless good ol' U.S. taxpayer is required, that is forced, to bail them out). Didn't see the monolines have a good day at the equity office today.
Another interesting issue is with respect to muni's. Appears to be some recent imbalances with some issues - muni's could be another problem in the near future.
RM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cato

Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 229 Location: Portola Valley, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BPet wrote: |
I was thinking more on the lines of taking something like $500K and spreading it out along the normal asset allocation. If you have a long enough time horizon(20yrs+), then with an equity biases AA (maybe 80/20), it should be very likely that you would beat the 4.25% rate(or even if it went up to 6%) over the long time horizon. And, if its spread in the same manner as the rest of the AA, it would be easy to sell a specified percentage of each fund in the event that interest rates spiked(maybe above 7% or so). As long as you held the 500K for a year, your gains would be Long Term an so tax would be minimized. So, if over a long time period, you could pick up a few % on the $500K, that would serve to add to the compound return of the total portfolio. |
I think what both Al and I were suggesting before is that this use of margin isn't suited for a conventional buy-and-hold equities-bonds portfolio. Fidelity could change the rate on a whim at any time, regardless of market rates. So it only makes sense to invest in securities you can liquidate immediately if necessary.
In my case, It's about $300K in high dividend stocks (royalty trusts are perfect for this) and $200K in MM funds. I don't expect much (if any) capital appreciation on these stocks, so I can quickly liquidate them without worrying about ST gains.
-cato _________________ Citigroup delenda est. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
market timer

Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 2729 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cato wrote: | | Fidelity could change the rate on a whim at any time, regardless of market rates. So it only makes sense to invest in securities you can liquidate immediately if necessary. |
You could always move to the options and futures market, where implied interest rates should equal the risk free rate by arbitrage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tramper Al
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 2650
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| market timer wrote: | | You could always move to the options and futures market, where implied interest rates should equal the risk free rate by arbitrage. |
That's a thought. However, I wonder if the tax deductibility of investment interest expense (4.25% costs me about 2.85%) and the preferential tax treatment of (LT) gains really does favor margin and long positions as a better route for some of us. If I were to buy (2-3 years to expirations) calls on an equity index and hold for > 1 year before closing out, would any such gain be subject to LTCG rates? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
market timer

Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 2729 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tramper Al wrote: | | I wonder if the tax deductibility of investment interest expense (4.25% costs me about 2.85%) and the preferential tax treatment of (LT) gains really does favor margin and long positions as a better route for some of us. |
Yes, I'd prefer margin in your situation. Keep an eye on LT cap gains taxes, though.
| Quote: | | If I were to buy (2-3 years to expirations) calls on an equity index and hold for > 1 year before closing out, would any such gain be subject to LTCG rates? |
Yes, you get LT cap gains treatment on options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ilan1h
Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Come on guys, get fully perked up and monitor this bank meltdown. How can I become a banker, you ask. Follow the ETF's KBE (large banks) and KRE (Small banks), or the broader XLF. . To take full advantage, you may have to deviate a little from diehard philosophies, by:
If you get to making money in bank ETF's, don't asset allocate out for awhile. Rather, stay with it at least five years. If you're right, BE RIGHT BIG!
Strange, I have been thinking exactly along the same lines (almost every single point mentioned). This post makes me a bit nervous because I now realize that I am not the lone genius thinking about this . However, it is absolutely true that many of the asset classes mentioned are still overvalued even after a little market decline. However, the bloodbath that the banks have taken will eventually have to subside. I have already bought $100K worth of Citibank at 30 and watched it plunge to 25 (I'm not worried). I plan on buying another $100K of XLF or KBE and holding it for years. I fully expect the bloodbath to continue for a while but will not sweat it. After all, these companies are not all going out of business. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
retired at 48
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 1726 Location: Saratoga NY; Port Saint Lucie, FL
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To: ilan1h
There is at least a third who feels this way... Another moderately successful diehard , Warren Buffett, just recently increased his accumulation of a Bank, Wells Fargo. Ref: Yahoo Finance.
Retired at 48 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
grok87
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 2814
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:34 pm Post subject: Re: Market timing thread: what looks attractive today? |
|
|
I know I'm getting into this thread late but here are some quick thoughts:
| ddb wrote: |
US Stocks: valuations don't seem too out-of-line compared to historical norms, however profit margins are at very high levels. All-in-all, this is probably what I view as the least unattractive equity asset class. |
Consider that the historical norms you refer to (e.g. average PE ratios) include periods of recession, depression, etc. when earnings have been very depressed and hence PEs high. In periods like this one average PEs have been lower.
| ddb wrote: |
Foreign Developed-Market stocks: recent (5 years or so) heavy outperformance compared to US stocks, but outperformance is largely due to the decline of the dollar. What do valuations look like in this market, compared to historical levels? I suspect that the valuation story is similar to US stocks. BUT, with the dollar at such a low level relative to other currencies, the asset class looks a little frightening if you believe that the dollar will rise back to a more "normal" level. |
Well if the euro depreciates against the dollar, foreign stocks that are exporters will do very well in euro terms and perhaps offset the euros depreciation.
| ddb wrote: |
Emerging Market stocks: very strong recent (5 year) performance. Is this market in a bubble, and will the bubble burst? |
Yep I think these are a bubble. I would make sure you keep to your long term asset allocation and not let it drift upward.
| ddb wrote: |
Commodities: very high recent performance.
|
probably another bubble- same comment as EM.
| ddb wrote: |
REITs: even despite recent downturn, 5-year performance numbers are still huge.
|
REITs are trading at a substantial discount to their NAV (around 20% discount). I have no idea what real estate will do over the next year or so. But I predict REITs will outperform the NCREIF index which tracks direct real estate investment, and funds like the TIAA Real Estate Annuity.
cheers
grok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|