Bogleheads Home Bogleheads
Investing Advice Inspired by Jack Bogle
 
  WikiWiki    FAQFAQ    SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why not commodities?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Theory, News & General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PlainJane



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 307

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:37 am    Post subject: Why not commodities? Reply with quote

Hi everyone,

I've been reading old threads about the 1970's. It seemed like the only things that worked back then were RE and commodities. Even bonds didn't help.

Yet, I don't see too many people here who have an allocation to commodities like they do to RE. Is there a reason for that? Is it becuase there is no good vehical for commodities? Any recommended reading on the subject?

Thanks!

-Jane
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
magellan



Joined: 09 Mar 2007
Posts: 759

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jane,

If you search the forum for commodities or CCFs (collateralized commodity futures), you'll see that commodities are a hot topic with Bogleheads. There's a good thread here for a start.

There's a nearly universal opinion that if you're going to add commodity exposure to your portfolio, CCFs are a better bet rather than owning actual commodities. CCFs are a pretty complicated investment and that complexity is probably what deters many from adding them to their portfolio. Also, there are a couple of respected posters here who seem to understand the instruments pretty well, yet don't believe that they should be a part of most investors' asset allocation.

Personally, I'm on board with Larry Swedroe and others who believe CCFs can make for a better portfolio. I've owned PIMCO's Commodity Real Return fund for quite a while and have no complaints.

One important point is that you can get access to the institutional class shares of the PIMCO commodities fund (PCRIX) through Vanguard's brokerage service. This share class has much lower expenses than the investor class shares.

Jim

(edited to fix typos)


Last edited by magellan on Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:16 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pkcrafter



Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 2526
Location: CA

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:27 am    Post subject: commodities Reply with quote

Jane, there have been many conversations on commodities on the forum in the past few months, and many investors are using them. Try a search. One specific recommendation from Larry Swedroe is PIMCO commodity real return fund.

Paul
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RobertH



Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 212
Location: Bay Area

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The initial purchase minimum for PCRIX is $100k at Schwab, where my accounts are. If I recall other posts correctly it is $25k at TD-Waterhouse and Vanguard. Management fees for PCRIX shares are 0.5% lower than for the PCRDX share class.

Robert
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
G12



Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 998

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, PCRIX minimum through Vanguard is $25k.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=PCRIX&t=5y

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?....mp;c=PCRIX

I own both. No recommendation from me, but recently rebalanced back up to desired allocation in VGSIX/VNQ (ran out of room in the Roth, had to take VNQ in TIRA) after not adding new money the past few years.

Neither pro nor con on timing the holdings and Taylor makes very good points when he brings up the suggestion that investors are well served to establish significant positions in broad based market index funds before contemplating S&D allocations, if then.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Quasimodo



Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 656

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you don't have $25,000 or more to put into a commodities fund, PIMCO has another one (PCRDX) with a $5,000 minimum but a higher expense ratio - 1.24% I believe. You can buy through Vanguard brokerage for no fee if you hold the shares for at least 6 months.

John
_________________
A beautiful thing is never perfect.

Egyptian proverb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryswedroe



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 5368
Location: St Louis MO

PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the two best and easy to read papers are in order
a) Ibbotson associates
b) Gorton and Rouwenhorst

Then if still want more read Erb and Harvey paper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kenster1



Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2521

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scott Burns now adds Commodities to his model portfolios...

http://assetbuilder.com/blogs/....-2008.aspx

He also favors the Powershares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund ETF (DBC) which tracks the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index.

Quote:
There are three major indexes which track the commodities market. The S&P Goldman Sachs commodity index (S&P GSCI), the Dow Jones-AIG commodity index (Dow Jones - AIG) and the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index (DBLCI). In our analysis, DBLCI was the most effective index. It has the following characteristics;

- Comprised of six commodities: West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, heating oil, aluminum, gold, corn and wheat.

- Constant weighting which reflect world production and inventory, providing a diverse and balanced commodity exposure.

- A rule-based and transparent calculation methodology. Energy contracts are rolled monthly, metal and grain contracts annually.

- Historically measured from December 1, 1988.

The security which tracks this benchmark is the Powershares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The downside is the lack of history associated with this exchange-traded-fund -- started in March 2006. However, with the history of DBLCI, we can garner the necessary data to make prudent inclusion of the asset in the Model Portfolios.

_________________
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kenster1



Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2521

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting article...

http://www.financial-planning.....01022.html

Quote:
Quasi-Commodities?

Here's how energy, precious metals and real estate compare with the entire commodities index.

By Craig L. Israelsen

[Craig L. Israelsen, PhD, teaches family finance at Brigham Young University.]

July 1, 2007- Clients seem to clamor for alternative assets these days, and adding them to investment portfolios has gained increased acceptance, or at least increased consideration. To be sure, the definition of alternative assets differs from person to person. In this study, alternative assets are limited to commodities, energy, precious metals and real estate.

This study examines the historical impact of adding energy, precious metals or real estate and a combination of the three to a portfolio in lieu of a full-fledged commodities fund. Why make these comparisons? One reason is that actionable commodities-based mutual funds and exchange-traded funds are relatively new products, even though annual performance data for the S&P GSCI Commodity Index is available dating back to 1970. By comparison, actionable mutual funds that specialize in real estate (REITs), precious metals and energy stocks have long histories.

In addition, mutual funds that attempt to track commodities indexes, such as the S&P GSCI or the Dow Jones AGI Commodity Index, use structured notes and derivatives, which create a far more complicated fund structure. Therefore the study examined whether or not energy, real estate or precious metals are reasonable surrogates for commodities. (All performance data used in this study was obtained from Morningstar Principia.)

The primary objective of this study was to identify the effect of adding these three alternative assets to a core equity/bond portfolio in the preretirement accumulation mode and during the retirement withdrawal phase. I compared these three asset classes—singly and combined—with the impact of adding a commodities index to a core portfolio.


Quote:
The average 12-month rolling correlation between the monthly returns of commodities and the aggregate monthly returns of the moderate core portfolio was 0.05 over the 20-year period. By comparison, the correlation of the moderate core portfolio to energy was 0.61, to real estate, 0.51, to precious metals, 0.33, and to the alternative asset blend, 0.67. Therefore commodities really did the most zigging when the core portfolio assets were zagging. And while commodities may not produce the highest dollar gain compared with the other alternative assets, the low correlation of commodities tends to provide attractive downside protection.

The case for adding commodities is strongest in the retirement portfolio, since minimizing losses is a primary goal when clients are drawing down assets, and commodities produced the best results in that category (as do most low-correlation assets). The other alternative assets, however, were stronger candidates for accumulation portfolios.

Energy and/or real estate appear to be viable alternatives to commodities. Both provided return enhancement in excess of commodities in the accumulation portfolios as well as loss protection during the drawdown phase. Admittedly, the loss protection was inferior to that provided by commodities. But given the logistical challenges of creating and delivering commodity-based mutual funds and ETFs, energy and/or real estate are reasonably attractive "alternatives."

_________________
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tc101



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 1218
Location: Atlanta - Retired in 2004 at age 54

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have decided to wait at least a year to move money into commodities from broader index funds like total stock market.

Commodities have just had a very good run. My thinking is that it can't hurt much to wait a year or until they go down and see if the enthusiasm for them is still there after they take a dip.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cherijoh



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 194
Location: Charlotte NC

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tc101 wrote:
I have decided to wait at least a year to move money into commodities from broader index funds like total stock market.

Commodities have just had a very good run. My thinking is that it can't hurt much to wait a year or until they go down and see if the enthusiasm for them is still there after they take a dip.


Commodities have indeed had a very good run. I got into PCRIX when they dipped back in 2006. They are currently partially propping up my portfolio along with my allocation to TIPS (I'm in negative territory for YTD but still positive for 12 month total return). A real life example of Larry Swedroe's frequent discussion of "portfolio insurance".

Unfortunately, many people will probably sell their underperforming stock funds and get into commodies now only to sell them when they in turn underperform! The time to buy them is when your stock funds are going like gangbusters.

C
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryswedroe



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 5368
Location: St Louis MO

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tc101

I made that mistake myself tc. I bought in 2003 after a good run and was afraid of that so I did not buy the full amount I would have chosen --still waiting for that dip
You buy for insurance not returns so should not care about the recent returns

Bill Bernstein and I chat often and he has been waiting for years now for that dip so he might buy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diasurfer



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1157
Location: oahu

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

larryswedroe wrote:
tc101

I made that mistake myself tc. I bought in 2003 after a good run and was afraid of that so I did not buy the full amount I would have chosen --still waiting for that dip
You buy for insurance not returns so should not care about the recent returns

Bill Bernstein and I chat often and he has been waiting for years now for that dip so he might buy.


Wow! Interesting to read that. Even the sages "time" a bit. I'm also a dip-waiter.

Also still trying to figure out what is a better option than the PIMCO CCF at 1.25% ER. (No, don't have $25K so I can't get it at the 0.75% ER).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tc101



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 1218
Location: Atlanta - Retired in 2004 at age 54

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Larry,

What percent of your portfolio is in CCFs? If I remember correctly you are in your mid 80s? Would you recommend a similar percent for someone younger?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CyberBob
Moderator


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 2096
Location: /home/bob

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

diasurfer wrote:
Also still trying to figure out what is a better option than the PIMCO CCF at 1.25% ER.


Isn't the Vanguard Commodities Fund going to be available on January 24th along with the Managed Payout Funds?

Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryswedroe



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 5368
Location: St Louis MO

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TC, ouch
I am 56,
And I own a few percent--keeping with my suggested recommendation of from 5-10% of equity allocation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diasurfer



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1157
Location: oahu

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:37 pm    Post subject: VG CCF? Reply with quote

CyberBob wrote:
diasurfer wrote:
Also still trying to figure out what is a better option than the PIMCO CCF at 1.25% ER.


Isn't the Vanguard Commodities Fund going to be available on January 24th along with the Managed Payout Funds?

Bob


A google search turned up nothing on a "Vanguard Commodities Fund". A Morningstar article mentioned the possibility of a hedge fund being released on January 24 along with the Managed Payout Funds. Please track down your source if you can.

My understanding is that to do its job in the portfolio, the fund needs to be a CCF, not a fund that invests in commodities companies. I'm sure a lot of Diehards would be excited if VG released a CCF.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SmallHi



Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 1711

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:25 pm    Post subject: REITS go poof! Reply with quote

Interesting that the Asset Builder portfolios (and returns) no longer reflect the prior enormous weighting to REITS (over 20%). Think that has anything to do with their 30%+ declines from Feb of last year values?

Now the portfolios seem to reflect a significant shift out of REITS and into commodities (done at the end of the year and not back in 2000), and unsuspecting future investors will never know the difference?

Sadly, AB clients will never capture the actual returns of these "model portfolios" with after the fact changes like this. Sorry, Scott. But in the real world, we don't get such "do overs"!

This wouldn't be such an issue if the whole push of AB is the performance of their model portfolios vs. poorly matched benchmarks (S&P 500 and so forth).

My advice to anyone reading: choose a real advisory firm like BAM, Portfolio Solutions, Equius Partners, or Altruist! If the fact that this firm won't go through the effort of using tax-managed funds and muni bonds in taxable accounts wasn't evidence enough, take this message as the nail in the coffin.

Sorry for the rant.

sh

PS -- equally scary is their inability to comprehend basic concepts of Modern Portfolio Theory...based on this quote from one of their principals:

In our optimized portfolio construction our "glue" -- the stuff that influences how we put portfolios together -- is the level of risk in any given asset class Shocked

yeah, forget about how that risk translates on a portfolio level, focus on each asset class, one by one, and all by themselves!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
larryswedroe



Joined: 22 Feb 2007
Posts: 5368
Location: St Louis MO

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually just sent Sauter an email asking him if Vanguard would develop a CCF fund backed by TIPS. Would love to see Vanguard type pricing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diasurfer



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1157
Location: oahu

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

larryswedroe wrote:
I actually just sent Sauter an email asking him if Vanguard would develop a CCF fund backed by TIPS. Would love to see Vanguard type pricing


Thanks Larry (and for your other answers to my CCF questions on another thread). Maybe when VG produces such a fund it will be the right "time" for me to get in.

[Yes I realize that that will indicate how popular they have become and the contrarians will point out that is the wrong time to chase the hot asset].
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kenster1



Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 2521

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tc101 wrote:
Larry,

What percent of your portfolio is in CCFs? If I remember correctly you are in your mid 80s? Would you recommend a similar percent for someone younger?


LOL !!!!!!

Surprised
_________________
SURGEON GENERAL'S WARNING: Any overconfidence in your ability, willingness and need to take risk may be hazardous to your health.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
diasurfer



Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 1157
Location: oahu

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought the poster was asking if Larry's portfolio was 85% commodities. I can't decide which is funnier!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tc101



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 1218
Location: Atlanta - Retired in 2004 at age 54

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If I remember correctly you are in your mid 80s?

TC, ouch
I am 56,


Sorry Larry. I had you confused with someone else from a conversation last month on aging. I'm 57 and I guess my own memory is starting to go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CyberBob
Moderator


Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 2096
Location: /home/bob

PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:51 pm    Post subject: Re: VG CCF? Reply with quote

diasurfer wrote:
A google search turned up nothing on a "Vanguard Commodities Fund". A Morningstar article mentioned the possibility of a hedge fund being released on January 24 along with the Managed Payout Funds. Please track down your source if you can.

The Vanguard Market Neutral Fund is already available.

As for the commodities fund, the only place I've actually seen it mentioned is in the table below from a preliminary prospectus of the Managed Payout Funds.
However, upon reading it again, maybe it was wishful thinking on my part that it was going to be an actual fund. The 'Not Applicable' for the commodities fund name may actually mean that there isn't going to be a fund and the Managed Payout funds will just hold commodities directly, rather than it meaning the fund is just as yet unnamed. Sad



Code:
ASSET CLASS OR INVESTMENT                           VANGUARD FUND    ASSET ALLOCATION RANGE
                                                                          (MINIMUM-MAXIMUM)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Stocks                         Total Stock Market Index Fund                 15%-35%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-U.S. Stocks                   FTSE All-World ex-US Index Fund                 15%-35%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bonds                                Total Bond Market Index Fund                  0%-25%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash                                        Market Liquidity Fund                  0%-20%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Neutral Investments                    Market Neutral Fund                  0%-25%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity-Linked Investments                       Not applicable                  0%-10%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inflation-Linked Investments  Inflation-Protected Securities Fund                  0%-20%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Real Estate Investments                           REIT Index Fund                  0%-10%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
clay



Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 228

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quasimodo wrote:
If you don't have $25,000 or more to put into a commodities fund, PIMCO has another one (PCRDX) with a $5,000 minimum but a higher expense ratio - 1.24% I believe. You can buy through Vanguard brokerage for no fee if you hold the shares for at least 6 months.

John


Does is make any sense to hold something like this in a taxable account (like a lot of people here, my tax-deferred is full)?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Midpack



Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 279
Location: Chicagoland

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have commodities in my portfolio. Here's the most convicing read on the topic I've seen lately. http://www.indexuniverse.com/c....;Itemid=11
_________________
You only live once...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bogleheads Forum Index -> Investing - Theory, News & General All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group