Conversion from Investor Shares to Admiral Shares
Conversion from Investor Shares to Admiral Shares
With today's market run up, I passed the $100,000 Admiral shares requirement for one of my Vanguard funds (Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund). If I call Vanguard tomorrow morning and ask them to convert my Investor shares to Admiral shares, and the market drops such that my Investor shares fund falls below $100,000, will Vanguard still follow through on the conversion?
By the way, I should pass the ten-year Admiral shares requirement for this fund some time in the first quarter of 2011.
By the way, I should pass the ten-year Admiral shares requirement for this fund some time in the first quarter of 2011.
Gordon
Don't wait. Do it online right now.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... iewJSP.jsp
Click on "Convert an Account" on the right, login, and do it.
You can also do it after logging in, but this is the link I can find without logging in.
P.S. They shouldn't treat you any differently than someone who bought $100,000 today. If the market drops tomorrow, the person who just purchased still has Admiral shares. I know, I bought in late April and just recently got back above $100,000.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... iewJSP.jsp
Click on "Convert an Account" on the right, login, and do it.
You can also do it after logging in, but this is the link I can find without logging in.
P.S. They shouldn't treat you any differently than someone who bought $100,000 today. If the market drops tomorrow, the person who just purchased still has Admiral shares. I know, I bought in late April and just recently got back above $100,000.
I don't know when this may have changed, but you can get admiral shares for TSM at $10,000 now. Total bond market as well. Just was able to get admiral shares in my IRA accounts this morning. Maybe this is new, maybe I'm behind the times but it was a pleasant surprise today.Scott S wrote:Exciting stuff! I can't wait until my TSM holding gets there -- it'll be a couple years, yet.
- Scott
Edited to add: Just looked it up and Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund is another with a $10,000 initial requirement now for admiral.
Last edited by jhh9327 on Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
When did the change to $10,000 happen?
It is on the page I linked to before, but I didn't even notice it.
P.P.S. Just converted my EM. Thanks for the tip, jhh9327!
It is on the page I linked to before, but I didn't even notice it.
P.S. The link on the right side that was there last night is no longer there this morning.For an investment as low as $10,000, you can take advantage of our even lower-cost Admiral™ Shares, a share class of Vanguard mutual funds. The cost advantage can help you build wealth over time.
How to qualify** The minimum for certain sector index funds and tax-managed funds is $100,000.
- * Invest $10,000 or more in most Vanguard index funds that offer Admiral Shares.**
* Invest $50,000 or more in Vanguard actively managed funds that offer Admiral Shares.
P.P.S. Just converted my EM. Thanks for the tip, jhh9327!
Go to the Accounts and Activity page and under the Total Assets listing is a link that says Convert to Admiral Shares. Go to that and Vanguard will tell you what funds you have (if any) that qualify to an admiral upgrade. I just noticed the link this morning and that is how I made my changes.
Last edited by jhh9327 on Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
It just let me submit a conversion request on a $93k TSM position. The first page in the process and a subsequent page both still mentioned generic $100k limits.
But the TSM "Fees and minimums" page does indeed now say $10k.
Great news if this isn't a bug. Although I confess in a way I feel cheated.
But the TSM "Fees and minimums" page does indeed now say $10k.
Great news if this isn't a bug. Although I confess in a way I feel cheated.
I really think it is brand new. I haven't seen anything on this forum that I can remember, but this web page changed from last night to this morning in at least one respect, the link to making the conversion ("Convert an Account" is no longer there). I suspect the amounts changed as well. gkaplan, what do you remember from last night?
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... =VGFundsOV
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/conten ... =VGFundsOV
- House Blend
- Posts: 4878
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 1:02 pm
Re: Conversion from Investor Shares to Admiral Shares
That's HUGE.
Thanks!
--Pete
Thanks!
--Pete
I am assuming that along the curve the lower the account value the more accounts they have. So 20% of their accounts might be below $10k (accounts that people do not add money etc), so it might make sense to still charge the investor share fee for these accounts.Sidney wrote:May make more sense just to eliminate the regular shares.
I guess another alternative (which I would prefer) is to create a new share class somewhere around $500K-1,000K with even lower ER. Or maybe tie lower ER to large total account status ($5M, $10M ?? pick a number) to get people to consolidate. The current Flagship benefits are fairly trivial and don't really drive behavior IMO. Probably hard to tie ER to total account size since each fund is probably a separate legal structure.infecto wrote:I am assuming that along the curve the lower the account value the more accounts they have. So 20% of their accounts might be below $10k (accounts that people do not add money etc), so it might make sense to still charge the investor share fee for these accounts.Sidney wrote:May make more sense just to eliminate the regular shares.
I always wanted to be a procrastinator.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:10 pm
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Institutional shares.Chuck wrote:Fleet Admiral shares? Emperor shares?Sidney wrote:I guess another alternative (which I would prefer) is to create a new share class somewhere around $500K-1,000K with even lower ER.
Chaz |
|
“Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons." Woody Allen |
|
http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
No tax consequences. I have converted to Admiral shares in IRA and in taxable accounts. In the taxable account, the conversion is not treated as sale but change of share class. The cost basis of the investor shares shifts to the admiral shares. I did not receive a 1099B for the conversion in the taxable account. If there is a difference in share price between investor and admiral shares, the treatment is similar to a stock split.want2bedone wrote:Are there any tax consequences in coverting to Admiral shares?
Hi DSInvestor,DSInvestor wrote:If there is a difference in share price between investor and admiral shares, the treatment is similar to a stock split.
Having never owned individual stocks before, could you elaborate on this treatment? Say someone has a few dozen purchase dates over several years, and is using FIFO for sales. Assume also that the only software being used to track the cost basis is an Excel spreadsheet.
Will a new history of shares purchased have to be synthesized using historic price data, creating new share/share price entries for all the old purchases?
What would happen if admiral shares weren't even available when the first investor class shares were purchased?
--Pete
Let's make it simple. Suppose the investor shares are $40 and the admiral shares are $20 on the day you convert. For every investor share you had before, you will now have two admiral shares. If you paid $100 for 20 investor shares on 4/23/1994, you will now have 40 admiral shares that you paid $100 for on 4/23/1994. Your basis for those 40 shares is $100.petrico wrote:Having never owned individual stocks before, could you elaborate on this treatment? Say someone has a few dozen purchase dates over several years, and is using FIFO for sales. Assume also that the only software being used to track the cost basis is an Excel spreadsheet.DSInvestor wrote:If there is a difference in share price between investor and admiral shares, the treatment is similar to a stock split.
Will a new history of shares purchased have to be synthesized using historic price data, creating new share/share price entries for all the old purchases?
What would happen if admiral shares weren't even available when the first investor class shares were purchased?
Not using historical prices. Use the conversion ratio. Suppose 1,300 investor shares converted in to 1,000 Admiral shares, the ratio is 1.3. In your spreadsheet, for each purchase, divide the number of shares by 1.3:1, and multiply your purchase price by 1.3x.petrico wrote:Say someone has a few dozen purchase dates over several years, and is using FIFO for sales. Assume also that the only software being used to track the cost basis is an Excel spreadsheet.
Will a new history of shares purchased have to be synthesized using historic price data, creating new share/share price entries for all the old purchases?
What would happen if admiral shares weren't even available when the first investor class shares were purchased?
--Pete
Harry Sit has left the forums.
Raise the per share price, not the total price. If you paid $100 for a bunch of shares, you paid $100 for the equivalent bunch of converted shares, it's just that there are now a different number of shares.tfb wrote:Not using historical prices. Use the conversion ratio. Suppose 1,300 investor shares converted in to 1,000 Admiral shares, the ratio is 1.3. In your spreadsheet, for each purchase, reduce the number of shares by 1.3:1, and raise your purchase price by 1.3x.petrico wrote:Say someone has a few dozen purchase dates over several years, and is using FIFO for sales. Assume also that the only software being used to track the cost basis is an Excel spreadsheet.
Will a new history of shares purchased have to be synthesized using historic price data, creating new share/share price entries for all the old purchases?
What would happen if admiral shares weren't even available when the first investor class shares were purchased?
--Pete
Note: when you fill out Schedule D, you are not asked for the per share price. You are asked for the cost of the shares you sold. If you paid $100 for 10 shares and these convert to 13 shares, when you sell the 13 shares, you report that you paid $100 for them. The per share price is irrelevant.
Edit: I see I flipped tfb's example. His 10 shares converted to 7.6923 shares. These 7.6923 shares would still have a cost of $100.
Okay, thanks tfb! That makes sense, and will be simple to do.tfb wrote:Not using historical prices. Use the conversion ratio. Suppose 1,300 investor shares converted in to 1,000 Admiral shares, the ratio is 1.3. In your spreadsheet, for each purchase, divide the number of shares by 1.3:1, and multiply your purchase price by 1.3x.
@sscritic: sorry for being dense. I just wanted to make sure converting all the old share/share price entries needed to be done. If using FIFO or specific ID for sales, it will need to be done, just to properly account for which shares are actually being sold.
Thanks again,
--Pete
Lower Admiral Thresholds for 10 Year Accounts
Did VG lower the Admiral threshold for accounts (active funds) over 10 years old?
Actually, no. The minimum holding time was removed, but the $50K limit still stands for active funds.livesoft wrote:^ Yes, from $50K to $10K.
--PeteHow to qualify
* Invest $10,000 or more in most Vanguard index funds that offer Admiral Shares.**
* Invest $50,000 or more in Vanguard actively managed funds that offer Admiral Shares.
Here's a Yahoo New Article entitled Vanguard Strikes Back in Mutual Fund Price Wars:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Vanguard- ... l?x=0&.v=1
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Vanguard- ... l?x=0&.v=1
More people can be admirals at Vanguard now.
Vanguard on Wednesday morning lowered the minimum initial investments for the low-cost Admiral Share classes of more than 50 active and passive funds. It dropped the ante for broad market index fund Admiral Shares to $10,000 from $100,000. Many of Vanguard's actively managed stock and bond funds also lowered their Admiral Shares minimums to $50,000 from $100,000.
Is it possible to exchange Investor shares for Admiral shares when the funds are held at a discount brokerage?
I paid a transaction fee when purchasing my investor shares. Will I have to pay a fee when i sell investor shares and again when i buy admiral shares or is there some type of redemption? Again, this is for Vanguard Mutual Funds held at another company.
I paid a transaction fee when purchasing my investor shares. Will I have to pay a fee when i sell investor shares and again when i buy admiral shares or is there some type of redemption? Again, this is for Vanguard Mutual Funds held at another company.
Sent from my iphone
It would be very unusual, in fact I think non-existent, that you can hold Admiral Funds at another company in a brokerage account.cjackson0 wrote:Is it possible to exchange Investor shares for Admiral shares when the funds are held at a discount brokerage?
I paid a transaction fee when purchasing my investor shares. Will I have to pay a fee when i sell investor shares and again when i buy admiral shares or is there some type of redemption? Again, this is for Vanguard Mutual Funds held at another company.
Someone may have better information and there may have been an example of this cited but the option was discontinued?
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
Be careful about terminology. An exchange is typically an order to sell one fund to buy another. If the admiral shares of your fund are available at your discount brokerage an exchange would sell the investor shares and buy the admiral shares. This would be a taxable event in a taxable account. It may trigger a wash sale if you sell for a loss.cjackson0 wrote:Is it possible to exchange Investor shares for Admiral shares when the funds are held at a discount brokerage?
I paid a transaction fee when purchasing my investor shares. Will I have to pay a fee when i sell investor shares and again when i buy admiral shares or is there some type of redemption? Again, this is for Vanguard Mutual Funds held at another company.
What people are doing is changing the share class from investor to admiral shares. This would not be a taxable event.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:13 pm
- Location: IsThisHeaven? No It's Iowa
- Sunny Sarkar
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:02 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
- Contact:
Can't it be rolled over to one of 'em "complex" lucky IRAs?HawkeyeMike wrote:My "Simple IRA's" are not eligible for conversion
Have 3 Funds way past the $ Limits
Bummer
"Buy-and-hold, long-term, all-market-index strategies, implemented at rock-bottom cost, are the surest of all routes to the accumulation of wealth" - John C. Bogle
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
Admiral shares are not available in SIMPLE-IRA but if you've had your SIMPLE-IRAs for over 2 years, you may be able to rollover to a TradIRA where you can get Admiral shares.HawkeyeMike wrote:My "Simple IRA's" are not eligible for conversion
Have 3 Funds way past the $ Limits
Bummer
Here's something from IRS SIMPLE-IRAs:
http://www.irs.gov/retirement/article/0 ... 00.html#40
bold = my emphasisCan an amount be transferred from a SIMPLE IRA to another IRA in a tax-free trustee-to-trustee transfer?
During the 2-year period (described in Q&A 2 under the Distribution section above), an amount in a SIMPLE IRA may be transferred to another SIMPLE IRA in a tax-free trustee-to-trustee transfer. If, during this 2-year period, an amount is paid from a SIMPLE IRA directly to the trustee of an IRA that is not a SIMPLE IRA, the payment is neither a tax-free trustee-to-trustee transfer nor a rollover contribution; the payment is a distribution from the SIMPLE IRA and a contribution to the other IRA that does not qualify as a rollover contribution. After the expiration of the 2-year period, an amount in a SIMPLE IRA may be transferred in a tax-free trustee-to-trustee transfer to an IRA that is not a SIMPLE IRA.
http://www.irs.gov/retirement/article/0 ... tributions
When does the "2-year period" described in the previous question begin?
The 2-year period described in the previous question begins on the first day on which contributions made by the individual's employer are deposited in the individual's SIMPLE IRA.
Please do us all a favor and call up your discount broker and ask them. Or give us their phone number and we will do your work for you.cjackson0 wrote:Is it possible to exchange Investor shares for Admiral shares when the funds are held at a discount brokerage?
I paid a transaction fee when purchasing my investor shares. Will I have to pay a fee when i sell investor shares and again when i buy admiral shares or is there some type of redemption? Again, this is for Vanguard Mutual Funds held at another company.
Well, that ended up being a little more involved than I envisioned, but not bad at all. To preserve the original records, and as a math check, I just copied the entire "No. of Shares"; Cumulative Shares"; "Price/Share"; and "Cost" columns into four new inserted "Admiral" columns. Then the conversion ratio was applied to the "No. of Shares" and "Price/Share" columns. The new "Cumulative Shares" and "Cost" columns automatically computed the revised values. Well, the new and old "Cost" columns were identical -- thus the check. (Now I can just "hide" the original columns.)tfb wrote:Not using historical prices. Use the conversion ratio. Suppose 1,300 investor shares converted in to 1,000 Admiral shares, the ratio is 1.3. In your spreadsheet, for each purchase, divide the number of shares by 1.3:1, and multiply your purchase price by 1.3x.petrico wrote:Say someone has a few dozen purchase dates over several years, and is using FIFO for sales. Assume also that the only software being used to track the cost basis is an Excel spreadsheet.
Will a new history of shares purchased have to be synthesized using historic price data, creating new share/share price entries for all the old purchases?
What would happen if admiral shares weren't even available when the first investor class shares were purchased?
--Pete
Is that close to what other people who don't use financial software do? What does Quicken or MS Money do with the records of the shares already sold? Does it adjust those also? They must all be consistent, right? Especially if there are wash sale shares sold that were matched with unsold shares bought in the wash sale period. But the printout I kept with the 2008 tax return will now be different from the record that will go into the return with the future sales.
(Note to self: wash sales are to be avoided.)
--Pete
Conversion is merely an internal transfer from one class (e.g., investor shares) to another class (e.g., admiral shares). You did not sell anything and no dates should change from the original purchase date(s).If you convert from Investor Shares to Admiral Shares in a fund with a 1% Redemption Fee for sale of shares within the first year, do they retain the date of the original purchase in Investor Shares?
p.s., I did talk to my VG rep and confirmed the above understanding.
Thanks for the help.HueyLD wrote:Conversion is merely an internal transfer from one class (e.g., investor shares) to another class (e.g., admiral shares). You did not sell anything and no dates should change from the original purchase date(s).
It does make sense that the clock on the redemption fees does not change, especially when you consider that the two statements only show Conversion Out and Conversion In. If the Conversion In said "Purchase" then it would be a different story.
KW
Now that I qualify for Admiral status on so many of the funds I hold, I'm a little unsure about things b/c I have already taken advantage of $0 Vanguard ETF trades to convert many funds to their ETF equivalents. It seems to me that having an Admiral fund might be preferable to ETF b/c of the simplicity of the buy/sell process; no spreads or premiums or discounts to have to think about. What else am I missing?
Does anyone have any strong opinions about Admiral vs. ETF?
Does anyone have any strong opinions about Admiral vs. ETF?
If the expense % is the same then I would vote Admiral. ETF's just add a layer of complexity that is not needed imo.Angst wrote:Now that I qualify for Admiral status on so many of the funds I hold, I'm a little unsure about things b/c I have already taken advantage of $0 Vanguard ETF trades to convert many funds to their ETF equivalents. It seems to me that having an Admiral fund might be preferable to ETF b/c of the simplicity of the buy/sell process; no spreads or premiums or discounts to have to think about. What else am I missing?
Does anyone have any strong opinions about Admiral vs. ETF?
Vanguard's responses about the Admiral changes
On Thursday, 14 October, BH9 participants attended a reception at Vanguard. During the panel discussion the question of the Admiral qualifications changes came up. The Vanguard crew members provided information as follows:
1. Vanguard reduced the Admiral qualifications, because they experienced cost reduction and wanted to share these savings with their customers. Significant reductions are the result of using the Internet for many transactions instead of telephone representatives.
2. This is not the first time Vanguard is lowering Admiral qualifications. The previous time they dropped it from $250,000 to $100,000.
3. Admiral qualifications could not be extended to funds of funds, because they do not carry separate expenses except those of the underlying funds. Other funds unaffected by the change were tax-managed index funds, where Admiral shares would add a layer of complexity.
4. The intent of the Admiral qualifications changes was NOT to remove the incentive to convert to ETF. Vanguard wants their customers to make decisions about funds vs. ETFs based on what best suits their needs, not on price.
5. One example of customers who prefer ETFs to index funds are some financial advisers, because it is easier for them to manage their customer accounts with ETFs. When advisers place an ETF trade they see the outcome immediately.
Victoria
1. Vanguard reduced the Admiral qualifications, because they experienced cost reduction and wanted to share these savings with their customers. Significant reductions are the result of using the Internet for many transactions instead of telephone representatives.
2. This is not the first time Vanguard is lowering Admiral qualifications. The previous time they dropped it from $250,000 to $100,000.
3. Admiral qualifications could not be extended to funds of funds, because they do not carry separate expenses except those of the underlying funds. Other funds unaffected by the change were tax-managed index funds, where Admiral shares would add a layer of complexity.
4. The intent of the Admiral qualifications changes was NOT to remove the incentive to convert to ETF. Vanguard wants their customers to make decisions about funds vs. ETFs based on what best suits their needs, not on price.
5. One example of customers who prefer ETFs to index funds are some financial advisers, because it is easier for them to manage their customer accounts with ETFs. When advisers place an ETF trade they see the outcome immediately.
Victoria
Inventor of the Bogleheads Secret Handshake |
Winner of the 2015 Boglehead Contest. |
Every joke has a bit of a joke. ... The rest is the truth. (Marat F)
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:08 pm
Just asking.
I confess to some unease. Expense ratios for the Admiral Tax Managed Growth and Income Fund were 0.10% from 2005-2008. In 2009 they jumped up to 0.15% and remained there. Now they're lowering the cutoff from $100,000 to $10,000. That's ok, but I should like to take a closer look at Vanguard's operations. Have expenses as a share of total assets under management increased? I'd be willing to take into account recent market volatility, but I'm curious about whether Vanguard has lost some efficiency under its new CEO. Then again, maybe I would pleasantly surprised.