stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.
stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.

stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.
radchad3 wrote:Not sure how everyone calculates their percentages but I take the total amount saved (pre and post tax) and divide it by our W-2's. Calculating it this way gave us about 42% savings rate for 2012.
radchad3 wrote:"Not sure how everyone calculates their percentages but I take the total amount saved (pre and post tax) and divide it by our W-2's. Calculating it this way gave us about 42% savings rate for 2012."
rr2 wrote:"Which Box of the W2 do you use? Box 1 usually excludes pre tax 401k contributions and health insurance premiums and other pre tax deductions. If so you are calculating as fraction of net income. If you use Box 3 that is likely to be closer to your gross income.
I calculate everything as a fraction of gross income. To the gross income I add any employer 401k contributions."
radchad3 wrote:"I have been using box 1. I see what you are saying about using box 3 though. That is the only thing about these types of threads. The percentages can vary wildly depending on the numbers used. I wish there was a standard so we could truly compare apples to apples."
radchad3 wrote:I have been using box 1. I see what you are saying about using box 3 though. That is the only thing about these types of threads. The percentages can vary wildly depending on the numbers used. I wish there was a standard so we could truly compare apples to apples.
Sunflower wrote:stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.
Trust me, I don't -- I'm below median for my town. I knew I would never be able to afford a home in the SF Bay Area so I have no mortgage and no money to buy one outright but have healthy retirement accounts. But while I may have a nice amount in a 401(k)/Roth IRA I may be backing myself into a corner if I want to buy elsewhere. I believe I will ultimately move to a lower cost area in retirement where homes are affordable. But all my money will be tied up in those retirement accounts, so I'm not sure how to go about buying. This has me wondering and questioning.
Sunflower wrote:stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.
Trust me, I don't -- I'm below median for my town. I knew I would never be able to afford a home in the SF Bay Area so I have no mortgage and no money to buy one outright but have healthy retirement accounts. But while I may have a nice amount in a 401(k)/Roth IRA I may be backing myself into a corner if I want to buy elsewhere. I believe I will ultimately move to a lower cost area in retirement where homes are affordable. But all my money will be tied up in those retirement accounts, so I'm not sure how to go about buying. This has me wondering and questioning.
kamo wrote:Sunflower wrote:stingray5688 wrote:Wow. I think some of yall just get paid too much.
Trust me, I don't -- I'm below median for my town. I knew I would never be able to afford a home in the SF Bay Area so I have no mortgage and no money to buy one outright but have healthy retirement accounts. But while I may have a nice amount in a 401(k)/Roth IRA I may be backing myself into a corner if I want to buy elsewhere. I believe I will ultimately move to a lower cost area in retirement where homes are affordable. But all my money will be tied up in those retirement accounts, so I'm not sure how to go about buying. This has me wondering and questioning.
Keep renting. Unless there are non-financial reasons you wish to own a home.
crowd79 wrote:
By the looks of it, I know I'll keep renting since after doing various home vs rent calculators, I very well could do better renting long term if I invest the extra costs, mortgage interest, insurance, and upkeep of a home into my retirement accounts instead, and free from the stress and responsibilities of ever owning and being tied down to a house.
Hub wrote:Only the bogleheads could make me feel uneasy with my mere 24% of gross retirement savings rate! Early 30's.
I'm not yet maxing all available tax advantaged space, though once I do, I honestly think that will be plenty. Running the numbers I feel comfortable that 25 more years of my exact same savings amount will be sufficient for an early retirement.
No!crowd79 wrote:No worries, you're doing far better compared to the sad truth of the majority in this country:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/10/15/17-frightening-facts-about-retirement-savings-in-/
Feel better?
crowd79 wrote:"No worries, you're doing far better compared to the sad truth of the majority in this country:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/10/15/17-frightening-facts-about-retirement-savings-in-/
Feel better?"
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General
Users browsing this forum: Garco, Grasshopper, mbecker03, plannerman and 34 guests