A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Non-investing personal finance issues including insurance, credit, real estate, taxes, employment and legal issues such as trusts and wills.
Post Reply
Topic Author
jtelwood
Posts: 191
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:45 am

A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Post by jtelwood »

In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?

Thanks.

jte
dbr
Posts: 46137
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:50 am

Re: A tax question

Post by dbr »

When the tax cost is less.

Run tax software on both options and see what happens.
User avatar
FordBiggs
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: A tax question

Post by FordBiggs »

Just be careful though, I heard that once you file as Married Joint, you can never go back to filing as Married Separate.

I'm not yet married so I don't have first hand experience with this but this is what was told to me so just be careful. Most of my coworkers who are married suggest to file Married separate because of this reason but I'm sure it's subjective based on your unique situation.
Gill
Posts: 8221
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Florida

Re: A tax question

Post by Gill »

FordBiggs wrote:Just be careful though, I heard that once you file as Married Joint, you can never go back to filing as Married Separate. I'm not yet married so I don't have first hand experience with this but this is what was told to me so just be careful. Most of my coworkers who are married suggest to file Married separate because of this reason but I'm sure it's subjective based on your unique situation.
I suggest you talk to someone else about tax matters other than your coworkers. I'm afraid they're wrong. It is only in unusual circumstances where MFS makes sense.
Bruce
Cost basis is redundant. One has a basis in an investment | One advises and gives advice | One should follow the principle of investing one's principal
HouseStark
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:31 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: A tax question

Post by HouseStark »

FordBiggs wrote:Just be careful though, I heard that once you file as Married Joint, you can never go back to filing as Married Separate.

I'm not yet married so I don't have first hand experience with this but this is what was told to me so just be careful. Most of my coworkers who are married suggest to file Married separate because of this reason but I'm sure it's subjective based on your unique situation.
As has been pointed out, that is incorrect. What probably got distorted somewhere along the way in what the OP heard is the rule that after a return has been filed with Married Filing Jointly for a given year, the MFJ return cannot be AMENDED to Married Filing Separately status after the due date for the original return. Returns originally filed as MFS can be amended to MFJ.

There is no rule against switching between MFJ and MFS in different years and it would rarely make sense.

And again, don't go to your coworkers for tax advice. I might, but I work at a CPA firm.
jej
Posts: 355
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:21 am

Re: A tax question

Post by jej »

jtelwood wrote:In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?

Thanks.

jte
If your spouse is going to commit tax fraud, you may want to file separately.
User avatar
interplanetjanet
Posts: 2226
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:52 pm
Location: the wilds of central California

Re: A tax question

Post by interplanetjanet »

jtelwood wrote:In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?
When you live in Ohio. Sometimes.

Ohio is (somewhat) unique in that it penalizes MFS filers much less than most states do or the IRS does, but it requires the same filing status to be used at the state level as is used with the IRS. It's fairly common for tax preparers in Ohio to have to run things both ways to see if MFS can be beneficial.

In most of the rest of the USA this is less of an issue, and MFS is used more for when one spouse does not want to be on the hook for the other's taxes or wants to avoid a garnishment that the other spouse would be subject to (this is complex, also see the IRS' "injured spouse" filing provisions).
User avatar
LadyGeek
Site Admin
Posts: 95468
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:34 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Contact:

Re: A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Post by LadyGeek »

This thread is now in the Personal Finance (Not Investing) forum (tax question). Also, I retitled the thread.
Wiki To some, the glass is half full. To others, the glass is half empty. To an engineer, it's twice the size it needs to be.
mlipps
Posts: 1099
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:35 am

Re: A tax question

Post by mlipps »

interplanetjanet wrote:
jtelwood wrote:In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?
When you live in Ohio. Sometimes.

Ohio is (somewhat) unique in that it penalizes MFS filers much less than most states do or the IRS does, but it requires the same filing status to be used at the state level as is used with the IRS. It's fairly common for tax preparers in Ohio to have to run things both ways to see if MFS can be beneficial.

In most of the rest of the USA this is less of an issue, and MFS is used more for when one spouse does not want to be on the hook for the other's taxes or wants to avoid a garnishment that the other spouse would be subject to (this is complex, also see the IRS' "injured spouse" filing provisions).
I didn't know this. My parents live in Ohio and I'm trying to convince them to file separately next year so my mom can get a full savers credit at 50% for a back door Roth.
User avatar
theduke
Posts: 659
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 6:31 pm

Re: A tax question

Post by theduke »

mlipps wrote:
interplanetjanet wrote:
jtelwood wrote:In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?
When you live in Ohio. Sometimes.

Ohio is (somewhat) unique in that it penalizes MFS filers much less than most states do or the IRS does, but it requires the same filing status to be used at the state level as is used with the IRS. It's fairly common for tax preparers in Ohio to have to run things both ways to see if MFS can be beneficial.

In most of the rest of the USA this is less of an issue, and MFS is used more for when one spouse does not want to be on the hook for the other's taxes or wants to avoid a garnishment that the other spouse would be subject to (this is complex, also see the IRS' "injured spouse" filing provisions).
I didn't know this. My parents live in Ohio and I'm trying to convince them to file separately next year so my mom can get a full savers credit at 50% for a back door Roth.

Before you convince your parents to file separately on their federal return, you need to read Pub 17, page 21 Special Rules for filing MFS.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p17.pdf
mlipps
Posts: 1099
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:35 am

Re: A tax question

Post by mlipps »

theduke wrote:
mlipps wrote:
interplanetjanet wrote:
jtelwood wrote:In which situations does it make sense to file married with separate returns rather than a joint return?
When you live in Ohio. Sometimes.

Ohio is (somewhat) unique in that it penalizes MFS filers much less than most states do or the IRS does, but it requires the same filing status to be used at the state level as is used with the IRS. It's fairly common for tax preparers in Ohio to have to run things both ways to see if MFS can be beneficial.

In most of the rest of the USA this is less of an issue, and MFS is used more for when one spouse does not want to be on the hook for the other's taxes or wants to avoid a garnishment that the other spouse would be subject to (this is complex, also see the IRS' "injured spouse" filing provisions).
I didn't know this. My parents live in Ohio and I'm trying to convince them to file separately next year so my mom can get a full savers credit at 50% for a back door Roth.

Before you convince your parents to file separately on their federal return, you need to read Pub 17, page 21 Special Rules for filing MFS.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p17.pdf

Thanks. I've read through things pretty thoroughly, and done a fake tax return for them this way, but I'll read through this again as well. They have no deductions at this time since the house is paid off and kids are grown, except the potential retirement savings contribution, so I think they come out ahead in my plan.
User avatar
FordBiggs
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:53 pm
Location: New York

Re: A tax question

Post by FordBiggs »

MBMiner wrote:I suggest you talk to someone else about tax matters other than your coworkers. I'm afraid they're wrong. It is only in unusual circumstances where MFS makes sense.
Bruce
Oops. Got it. I apologize to the OP for the incorrect information. :oops:
HouseStark wrote:As has been pointed out, that is incorrect. What probably got distorted somewhere along the way in what the OP heard is the rule that after a return has been filed with Married Filing Jointly for a given year, the MFJ return cannot be AMENDED to Married Filing Separately status after the due date for the original return. Returns originally filed as MFS can be amended to MFJ.

There is no rule against switching between MFJ and MFS in different years and it would rarely make sense.

And again, don't go to your coworkers for tax advice. I might, but I work at a CPA firm.
I see. Thanks for the clarification. That makes sense on how my coworkers probably misinterpreted that information.
jared
Posts: 554
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:57 pm

Re: A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Post by jared »

It might make sense in some situations where taxpayer or spouse has a student loan that will be forgiven after a number of years of public service. The amount of the loan repayment can be tied to AGI, which could be substantially more for MFJ vs. MFS.
User avatar
sometimesinvestor
Posts: 1271
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:54 am

Re: A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Post by sometimesinvestor »

I believe the classic situation has to do with large uncovered medical bills by one of the members of the couple(usually the one with lower earnings so that more of the medical bill can be deducted.
The IRS allows you to deduct qualified medical expenses that exceed 7.5 percent of your adjusted gross income for the year. Your adjusted gross income is your taxable income minus any adjustments to income such as deductions, contributions to a traditional IRA and student loan interest.

For example, if you have a modified adjusted gross income of $45,000 and $4,475 of medical expenses, you would multiply $45,000 by 0.075 (7.5 percent) to find that only expenses exceeding $3,375 can be deducted. This leaves you with a medical expense deduction of $1,100 (4,475 - 3,375).
Here is a link to an article on the subject
http://www.smartmoney.com/taxes/income/ ... heStreet_h

As noted one can use tax software to see if the numbers will work out
User avatar
Toons
Posts: 14459
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 9:20 am
Location: Hills of Tennessee

Re: A tax question [Filing status - Which is better]

Post by Toons »

"Certain tax deductions and credits are forfeited to spouses when choosing to file separately including:
1) Child and Dependent Care Credit
2) College Tuition Deduction
3) American Opportunity Tax Credit
4) Student Loan Interest Deduction
5) Earned Income Tax Credit"


http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-fin ... te-decide/


:thumbsup
"One does not accumulate but eliminate. It is not daily increase but daily decrease. The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity" –Bruce Lee
Post Reply