ResNullius wrote:Remember the Hunt brothers?
.Grt2bOutdoors wrote:ResNullius wrote:Remember the Hunt brothers?
Yep, they cornered the silver market, Bunker Hunt drove the price to $50 an ounce. People were hawking their silverware, cashing in on the mania - until the SEC and CFTC got involved - that was the proverbial end of the Hunt brothers. They should have just stuck to their knitting - Oil! Greed will do you in everytime.
Grt2bOutdoors wrote:The floor is $1. One US Silver Dollar - legal tender value is one dollar.
WHL wrote:I own silver, and just like all of my other investments, I hope the current price goes down. It allows me to buy more!
Silver is about the only thing I DCA. I don't put any specific amount of money into it, I just buy based on spot price and my gut feeling. It's a long-term investment, but if the price ever jumps back up to the $47 we saw last year, I'm selling 100% of it.
hazlitt777 wrote:Do you own any silver?
Silver has now dropped below its total cost of production, which averages about $29. Back in 2007, producers could produce silver at about $22 (which was above the spot price of the time as well) but at a 10% inflation rate, cost per ounce now, about 4 years later is going to be around $30. Ignore mining companies that say they can produce silver at 5 or $6. That’s just mining costs and ignores exploration, smelting, refining and shipping. Back in 2007, if you looked at the top three miners, looked at their production and profits, you could calculate their total cost at $20-$24 back while the spot price was $18. Essentially, silver has been produced below total costs since the 1930′s, which is why only 22% of silver mines subsist on silver alone and the other 78% survive on their other metal production with silver as a mere by-product. No straight silver mine makes money, unless it is very, very high grade.
LH wrote:hazlitt777 wrote:Do you own any silver?
I have 4 one ounce silver pieces given to me as a Christmas present, and one 1964 half dollar given to me by a friend : )
I keep kicking around a pm allocation, but it's so high now.
I read silver is more volatile than gold, so if looking for volatility, might go half silver half gold.
But effectively no, I do not own a serious amount if silver portfoliowise
Peter Foley wrote:Is the floor for silver a function of supply and demand? Note the following opinion of a retired geologist:Silver has now dropped below its total cost of production, which averages about $29. Back in 2007, producers could produce silver at about $22 (which was above the spot price of the time as well) but at a 10% inflation rate, cost per ounce now, about 4 years later is going to be around $30. Ignore mining companies that say they can produce silver at 5 or $6. That’s just mining costs and ignores exploration, smelting, refining and shipping. Back in 2007, if you looked at the top three miners, looked at their production and profits, you could calculate their total cost at $20-$24 back while the spot price was $18. Essentially, silver has been produced below total costs since the 1930′s, which is why only 22% of silver mines subsist on silver alone and the other 78% survive on their other metal production with silver as a mere by-product. No straight silver mine makes money, unless it is very, very high grade.
There seems to be some debate about this; when I search for silver production costs on the internet I found fairly recent studies that concluded $9.53, $14.50, $17.00 and $29.00. My guess is the floor of silver would be somewhere in that range.
hazlitt777 wrote:LH wrote:hazlitt777 wrote:Do you own any silver?
I have 4 one ounce silver pieces given to me as a Christmas present, and one 1964 half dollar given to me by a friend : )
I keep kicking around a pm allocation, but it's so high now.
I read silver is more volatile than gold, so if looking for volatility, might go half silver half gold.
But effectively no, I do not own a serious amount if silver portfoliowise
We have chatted about this in the past I think...
My thought is just take a percentage allocation and rebalance. Forget about all this "floor" and "top" business. And a standard rule of thumb for gold vs. silver is set your precious metals allocation at 4/5th gold 1/5th silver. If you want a little more volatility, you could go 2/3 gold 1/3 silver. That is in terms of dollar value by the way, not ounces.
You should get it out of your system and just go for it...5% of your portfolio in precious metals![]()
(I would also stick with the one ounce rounds or one ounce Eagles/Philharmonics/Mapleleafs when dealing with silver.)
LH wrote:hazlitt777 wrote:LH wrote:hazlitt777 wrote:Do you own any silver?
I have 4 one ounce silver pieces given to me as a Christmas present, and one 1964 half dollar given to me by a friend : )
I keep kicking around a pm allocation, but it's so high now.
I read silver is more volatile than gold, so if looking for volatility, might go half silver half gold.
But effectively no, I do not own a serious amount if silver portfoliowise
We have chatted about this in the past I think...
My thought is just take a percentage allocation and rebalance. Forget about all this "floor" and "top" business. And a standard rule of thumb for gold vs. silver is set your precious metals allocation at 4/5th gold 1/5th silver. If you want a little more volatility, you could go 2/3 gold 1/3 silver. That is in terms of dollar value by the way, not ounces.
You should get it out of your system and just go for it...5% of your portfolio in precious metals![]()
(I would also stick with the one ounce rounds or one ounce Eagles/Philharmonics/Mapleleafs when dealing with silver.)
When it comes to possible allocation changes, my rule is think a lot, do little. Especially when it's a hot asset like gold silver are currently.
Appreciate your help. I may slowly add a silver and gold allocation in. Why is the rule of thumb 4/5 1/5? Is it store of wealth vs use as transactional money? Or some other rubric?
Thanks again,
LH
Peter Foley wrote:Is the floor for silver a function of supply and demand? Note the following opinion of a retired geologist:Silver has now dropped below its total cost of production, which averages about $29. Back in 2007, producers could produce silver at about $22 (which was above the spot price of the time as well) but at a 10% inflation rate, cost per ounce now, about 4 years later is going to be around $30. Ignore mining companies that say they can produce silver at 5 or $6. That’s just mining costs and ignores exploration, smelting, refining and shipping. Back in 2007, if you looked at the top three miners, looked at their production and profits, you could calculate their total cost at $20-$24 back while the spot price was $18. Essentially, silver has been produced below total costs since the 1930′s, which is why only 22% of silver mines subsist on silver alone and the other 78% survive on their other metal production with silver as a mere by-product. No straight silver mine makes money, unless it is very, very high grade.
There seems to be some debate about this; when I search for silver production costs on the internet I found fairly recent studies that concluded $9.53, $14.50, $17.00 and $29.00. My guess is the floor of silver would be somewhere in that range.
Peter Foley wrote:hazlit777
In my first post in this thread I said I really have no idea as to what the floor price is for silver. After doing a little research I concluded that I still didn't know, but that I disagreed with the lowest estimates posted based on economic principals. A couple earlier posts implied that the floor might be $1 or perhaps $10.
The law of supply and demand would lead one to believe that if demand is greater than supply (that is purported to be the case with silver), then the price of the product could rise until there is some equilibrium. If we were to guess that the cost to produce and bring to market (commercial or industrial) is in the neighborhood of $20, then a prolonged period of time below $20 might impact production and create a shortage. The shortage would, assuming supply and demand laws apply, increase the price.
My hypothesis would be that the floor for silver would be somewhat less than the cost of production. 10% less, 25% less, I don't know. You and I are saying essentially the same thing when you state that "If it costs more to produce than the market values it, it will no longer be produced till the price covers the cost of production plus some minimum profit."
If one is trying to limit the downside of investing in an asset like silver, I think considering the cost of production would be one factor to consider.
I too remember gas when it was in the .20 to .25 range. The principal sources of silver are copper, copper-nickel, gold, lead, and lead-zinc ores obtained from Canada, (such as Cobalt, Ontario); Mexico (such as Batopilas); Poland; Peru; Bolivia; Australia; and the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_mining#Areas
Gold is also produced by mining in which it is not the principal product. Large copper mines, such as the Bingham Canyon mine in Utah, often recover considerable amounts of gold and other metals along with copper. Some sand and gravel pits, such as those around Denver, Colorado, may recover small amounts of gold in their washing operations. The largest producing gold mine in the world, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia, is primarily a copper mine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_mining#Byproduct_gold_mining
Phineas J. Whoopee wrote:Hi everyone,
The production price of silver is a red herring. Most extracted silver is a byproduct of other mining. So long as the marginal return from casting it into bars exceeds discarding it as tailings it will be produced.The principal sources of silver are copper, copper-nickel, gold, lead, and lead-zinc ores obtained from Canada, (such as Cobalt, Ontario); Mexico (such as Batopilas); Poland; Peru; Bolivia; Australia; and the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver_mining#Areas
The story is similar, but not as extreme, for gold.Gold is also produced by mining in which it is not the principal product. Large copper mines, such as the Bingham Canyon mine in Utah, often recover considerable amounts of gold and other metals along with copper. Some sand and gravel pits, such as those around Denver, Colorado, may recover small amounts of gold in their washing operations. The largest producing gold mine in the world, the Grasberg mine in Papua, Indonesia, is primarily a copper mine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_mining#Byproduct_gold_mining
Are you sure you fully understand what you're investing in?![]()
PJW
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General
Users browsing this forum: emre1000, grok87, IlikeJackB, Johm221122, speedbump101 and 40 guests