crowd79 wrote:Very poor investment option. Risk $5 and likely lose it all with a 1% chance of winning
Kevin21 wrote:crowd79 wrote:Very poor investment option. Risk $5 and likely lose it all with a 1% chance of winning
It's a good investment, because it makes the game more interesting.

pennstater2005 wrote:No Super Bowl pools, now March Madness pools….that's another story
crowd79 wrote:Very poor investment option. Risk $5 and likely lose it all with a 1% chance of winning
Beantown85 wrote:crowd79 wrote:Very poor investment option. Risk $5 and likely lose it all with a 1% chance of winning
In terms of gambling options, it's actually great. Total payout is 100%, the house takes nothing. Can't get that in Vegas.
TomatoTomahto wrote:I don't know if they do it any more, but years ago a (now deceased) friend of mine worked in the commodity pits. They had a pool, $10,000 per box, $1,000,000 to the winner of the final score, no 1099![]()
For a while, I played poker in that crowd, but after a while I figured it was just easier to mail them a checkI was the fish; they were professionals.
prudent wrote:TomatoTomahto wrote:I don't know if they do it any more, but years ago a (now deceased) friend of mine worked in the commodity pits. They had a pool, $10,000 per box, $1,000,000 to the winner of the final score, no 1099![]()
For a while, I played poker in that crowd, but after a while I figured it was just easier to mail them a checkI was the fish; they were professionals.
No 1099, but almost certainly a CTR and/or SAR!
I have to wonder how they choose who is going to hold the money until the game is over. $1m in cash could seriously tempt some people to just blow town.
Return to Personal Consumer Issues
Users browsing this forum: BolderBoy, brianbooth, fareastwarriors, Google [Bot], jbh42, tadamsmar and 30 guests