Does this headline trouble you?
Does this headline trouble you?
From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
No because my expectation is that stocks will go up.
52% TSM, 23% TISM, 24.5% TBM, 0.5% cash
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
As a Boglehead, not really.
As someone who tries to look out for others who may not be as sophisticated/interested in investing, yes it does.
As someone who tries to look out for others who may not be as sophisticated/interested in investing, yes it does.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Most headlines about market activity attempt to connect two dots where no connection may exist. So I tend to ignore them. Half the time, the headline isn't even what the article is about. They would have been better off leaving small investors out of it.
I always wanted to be a procrastinator.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
I think the conventional wisdom is that by the time the small investors come back to the market, they are late to the game.allocator wrote:From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
All the more reason I keep to the passive index allocation path. If I was not in the retirement stage of life (as in no more accumulation) I might take a different tack; but I do not know what that would have been - sell, buy, hide, worry?
Rich
Don't it always seem to go * That you don't know what you've got * Till it's gone
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
As an "Emerging Boglehead", I would like to think I am above such headlines. Alas, as there is still that part of me which has not quite made the transition, I did take note. Where I came out was here: the only things over which I have control are my risk exposure (asset allocation) and my capacity to follow through on my plan (rebalancing when I am out of my band). To that end I turned on some music and started dinner for the kids.
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52216
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
It wouldn't have worried me before, and it worries me even less after reading Rick Ferri's article, Mr. Market doesn't care what you think, discussed here.
What the headline tells us is just that stocks have been rising recently... and that public memory is short... and that, best of all, the 2009 bottom is now still close enough to three years ago that every stock fund is showing great three-year return numbers.
What the headline tells us is just that stocks have been rising recently... and that public memory is short... and that, best of all, the 2009 bottom is now still close enough to three years ago that every stock fund is showing great three-year return numbers.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
- Peter Foley
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:34 am
- Location: Lake Wobegon
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Not at all - I hoping that we will hit new highs since that is about the top of my rebalancing band.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Not at all,,,It is pretty much normal after a severe decline in stock market cycles.The "average investor" usually starts to buy in long after the biggest gains have been made since the bottom of the bear market.The S&P is up 126% since the March 2009 bottom of 667.00.Just a guess,but I'm thinking we might be somewhere between the confidence and enthusiasm stage this time around
"One does not accumulate but eliminate. It is not daily increase but daily decrease. The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity" –Bruce Lee
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:47 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
- Dale_G
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:43 pm
- Location: Central Florida - on the grown up side of 85
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
I'll start getting concerned when there is a new reality show featuring day traders, and my local newspaper starts doing interviews of those with great (self reported) success stories.
There have been a lot of posts on Bogleheads lately about "getting back into the market", and a lot of hesitancy about actually pulling the trigger. It will be time to worry when we start seeing a lot of new posts saying, "I finally did it!"
Apparently human nature has not been repealed.
Dale
There have been a lot of posts on Bogleheads lately about "getting back into the market", and a lot of hesitancy about actually pulling the trigger. It will be time to worry when we start seeing a lot of new posts saying, "I finally did it!"
Apparently human nature has not been repealed.
Dale
Volatility is my friend
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
No, because a good contrarian always sees another headline (CNBC.com):Does this headline trouble you?
"Why S&P 1,500 May Signal Stock Rally Has Peaked"
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
My brother, who is a day trader for a company, told me he sold all of his personal US and international stock funds today. He is usually pretty on track. Reggie, if you sell all of your stocks, does that mean you will be 100% bonds? Not wishing to argue at all, but won't that mean locking in an inflation losing situation forever or are you planning to reenter the stock market?reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
-
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 7:01 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Nahhhh. That faith will be fleeting as soon as things get interesting again. This never changes.allocator wrote:From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
What's troubling - the headline itself or small investors buying high again? Whatever, I liked this last quote from the article: "But Russ Koesterich, the chief investment strategist at BlackRock, said that the current threats were “mundane” in comparison to what investors had faced over the last few years. “We’re not talking about big crises anymore,” Mr. Koesterich said.allocator wrote:From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
"Yes, investing is simple. But it is not easy, for it requires discipline, patience, steadfastness, and that most uncommon of all gifts, common sense." ~Jack Bogle
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
No - it gives me encouragement.
I launder my charitable giving through my taxable brokerage account when it makes sense - so gains are good. By donating you raise your cost basis for cap gains taxable purposes and give away unrealized gains rather than earnings while getting the full tax deduction as if it had been cash. Just initiated charitable transfer of a passle of stock today while the price was high. At the same time set up a transfer of cash back into the account to re-buy what I gave away.
And I started shorting the S&P 500 a week ago thinking it can't go much higher. Still waiting on that one, but I'm still hopeful for a Really Bad Day sometime in the next month or so. I haven't been to Las Vegas since Labor Day, so this is all I got.
I launder my charitable giving through my taxable brokerage account when it makes sense - so gains are good. By donating you raise your cost basis for cap gains taxable purposes and give away unrealized gains rather than earnings while getting the full tax deduction as if it had been cash. Just initiated charitable transfer of a passle of stock today while the price was high. At the same time set up a transfer of cash back into the account to re-buy what I gave away.
And I started shorting the S&P 500 a week ago thinking it can't go much higher. Still waiting on that one, but I'm still hopeful for a Really Bad Day sometime in the next month or so. I haven't been to Las Vegas since Labor Day, so this is all I got.
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:47 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
My brother, who is a day trader for a company, told me he sold all of his personal US and international stock funds today. He is usually pretty on track. Reggie, if you sell all of your stocks, does that mean you will be 100% bonds? Not wishing to argue at all, but won't that mean locking in an inflation losing situation forever or are you planning to reenter the stock market.Calm Man wrote:reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
No i dont plan on re entering into equities unless and when there is another large drop. I am up comfortably in my remaining stock holdings and will sell for a tidy profit
I have been largely in a bond ladder for decades with an eye to retirement living which is where i am presently at. I have no problem buying bonds as they provide a cash flow that i can use not only to live on but to reinvest the excess cash in whatever makes sense at the time. Typically more bonds. I realize this is not typical BH philosophy but i am in retirement and my earning years are over. I am far less concerned about inflation than i am about the distinct possibility of losing money at this stage of my life. If the market shoots up then so be it i dont care. I do not buy into the idea that one simply has to have equities in their portfolio. IMHO
- pennstater2005
- Posts: 2509
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:50 pm
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Not at all.
“If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments.” – Earl Wilson
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
I just read a headline yesterday that mentioned stocks are the cheapest they've been in a generation.
This statement bothers me a bit as I think stocks are fairly valued today....which is far from being very cheap.
I do expect a moderate bear market this year or next which will make stocks cheap.
This statement bothers me a bit as I think stocks are fairly valued today....which is far from being very cheap.
I do expect a moderate bear market this year or next which will make stocks cheap.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
You sure he doesn't close out all his positions on week ends?reggiesimpson wrote:My brother, who is a day trader for a company, told me he sold all of his personal US and international stock funds today.
A lot of stuff can happen over two days.
Paul
...and then Buffy staked Edward. The end.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
not at all - love stocks, pouring in new cash because I heard a smart person on CNBC said valuations are at historic lows and we are entering a new secular bull market
ok, nevermind,...stay the course
ok, nevermind,...stay the course
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Did the same thing today. My last stock I owned went up 18% so I sold it all! No more stocks, all index funds. I'm officially a Boglehead. It feels great.reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
stratton wrote:You sure he doesn't close out all his positions on week ends?reggiesimpson wrote:My brother, who is a day trader for a company, told me he sold all of his personal US and international stock funds today.
He closes all his positions before each day ends, not only the week. He does very well at the day trading job -- again, it's not his money, it's the company's money. But in hi personal money he thinks the market is horribly set for a large multiyear fall. I hope he's wrong and I don't tell him I use a 2 fund portfolio.
A lot of stuff can happen over two days.
Paul
-
- Posts: 12073
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:10 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
congratulations!Rammer wrote:Did the same thing today. My last stock I owned went up 18% so I sold it all! No more stocks, all index funds. I'm officially a Boglehead. It feels great.reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
- hoppy08520
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:36 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Yes, it troubles me. As soon as I read the headline, I thought, "OK, this is where all the foolish sell-low, buy-high investors jump in, only to have the market crash again, just to punish those fickle investors--again. And of course they'll bring me down with them."
Not that I'm going to do anything about it other than staying the course.
After reading Bernsteins "Four Pillars of Investing," I know that long-term stock prices will be want they will be, regardless of short term fluctuations, so I'm not worried.
Not that I'm going to do anything about it other than staying the course.
After reading Bernsteins "Four Pillars of Investing," I know that long-term stock prices will be want they will be, regardless of short term fluctuations, so I'm not worried.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
And you will still feel the same great way when the stock you sold soars another 18% on Monday, right? And still the same when it soars another 18 on Tuesday?Rammer wrote:Did the same thing today. My last stock I owned went up 18% so I sold it all! No more stocks, all index funds. I'm officially a Boglehead. It feels great.reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
"Yes, investing is simple. But it is not easy, for it requires discipline, patience, steadfastness, and that most uncommon of all gifts, common sense." ~Jack Bogle
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Of course not. I'll probably kick myself and think what might have been.Fallible wrote:And you will still feel the same great way when the stock you sold soars another 18% on Monday, right? And still the same when it soars another 18 on Tuesday?Rammer wrote:Did the same thing today. My last stock I owned went up 18% so I sold it all! No more stocks, all index funds. I'm officially a Boglehead. It feels great.reggiesimpson wrote:Todays WSJ commented that equities are at a five year high and the "chart" is getting ominous. I plan on selling the few stocks i have left and i wont look back. Taking a profit is called winning.
But I still won't buy back in.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Toons: so many of the Times readers posting comments seem to be somewhere between the 'contempt' and 'doubt and suspicion' levels ( 'The market is rigged', 'I'm never going to put any money in the market', 'I keep my money under the mattress', 'I've taken everything out in 2008 and will never invest again' etc.) But there seem to be a few Bogelhead types at the 'confidence' level.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Naikansha wrote:Toons: so many of the Times readers posting comments seem to be somewhere between the 'contempt' and 'doubt and suspicion' levels ( 'The market is rigged', 'I'm never going to put any money in the market', 'I keep my money under the mattress', 'I've taken everything out in 2008 and will never invest again' etc.) But there seem to be a few Bogelhead types at the 'confidence' level.
"One does not accumulate but eliminate. It is not daily increase but daily decrease. The height of cultivation always runs to simplicity" –Bruce Lee
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:55 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
The headline implies that it is the small investors that are driving up stock prices.
But as I understand it, small investors make too small of a % of overall purchases of equities to have that kind of effect (perhaps a fraction of a %, but not the kind of growth in the last 2 months).
Please correct me if I'm wrong. (It could depend on what is meant by "small investor" & I'm interpreting that to mean individuals (not billionaires), not pension funds, etc.)
But as I understand it, small investors make too small of a % of overall purchases of equities to have that kind of effect (perhaps a fraction of a %, but not the kind of growth in the last 2 months).
Please correct me if I'm wrong. (It could depend on what is meant by "small investor" & I'm interpreting that to mean individuals (not billionaires), not pension funds, etc.)
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
No. I'm content with my current asset allocation -- not perfect, but good enough -- and I already expect that the market will fluctuate unpredictably, because that's what it does.
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
They nature of the market is to grow with time.
There's a lot of bumps along the way, but I think the past 12 years has really skewed the perspective of markets to most investors, thinking that "all time highs" mean that the market is somehow overvalued, simply because the past decade has not seen those highs hit frequently...
but, historically, the market hits "highs" very frequently, which is expected. if it didn't, the market wouldn't return 8-10% annually over 30 years.
There's a lot of bumps along the way, but I think the past 12 years has really skewed the perspective of markets to most investors, thinking that "all time highs" mean that the market is somehow overvalued, simply because the past decade has not seen those highs hit frequently...
but, historically, the market hits "highs" very frequently, which is expected. if it didn't, the market wouldn't return 8-10% annually over 30 years.
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
-
- Posts: 6234
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 am
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
lindisfarne wrote:The headline implies that it is the small investors that are driving up stock prices.
But as I understand it, small investors make too small of a % of overall purchases of equities to have that kind of effect (perhaps a fraction of a %, but not the kind of growth in the last 2 months).
Please correct me if I'm wrong. (It could depend on what is meant by "small investor" & I'm interpreting that to mean individuals (not billionaires), not pension funds, etc.)
This is largely true, and at last count retail investors were still fleeing stocks for "safer" assets.
20% VOO | 20% VXUS | 20% AVUV | 20% AVDV | 20% AVES
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
allocator wrote:From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
Nope
If the headline was "you made money today" I would also not be troubled
-
- Posts: 9881
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:57 pm
- Location: Milky Way
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
It's really amazing, though, that so-called "small investors" regain faith only when the market makes new highs. There is probably a correction in the not too distant future, but this should not trouble long-term investors.allocator wrote:From this afternoon's New York Times:
"Stocks Near New Heights as Small Investors Regain Faith"
Best regards, -Op |
|
"In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity." Einstein
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Having sold in a fairly significant way on three occasions since the bottom to adhere to my AA through re-balancing I am less troubled by this headline.
No-one personally has told me lately that they are "getting in".
When that inevitably happens I'll grimace, wish them good luck with that and check my AA again to make sure I'm not overweight equity.
No-one personally has told me lately that they are "getting in".
When that inevitably happens I'll grimace, wish them good luck with that and check my AA again to make sure I'm not overweight equity.
70/30 AA for life, Global market cap equity. Rebalance if fixed income <25% or >35%. Weighted ER< .10%. 5% of annual portfolio balance SWR, Proportional (to AA) withdrawals.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Yes, it concerns me because the investing public tends to act stupidly. They were wildly enthusiastic about stocks in the late 1990s as well and we know how that turned out.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Line the sheep up, they are getting ready to open the slaughter house.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Wouldn't they be greedy pigs chasing returns, rather than sheep?midareff wrote:Line the sheep up, they are getting ready to open the slaughter house.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
As Tim Buckley (CIO @ Vanguard) recently noted on a webcast ~"Avoid the short-term noise."
Part-Owner of Texas |
|
“The CMH-the Cost Matters Hypothesis -is all that is needed to explain why indexing must and will work… Yes, it is that simple.” John C. Bogle
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
I will say this. I randomly, in passing, mentioned stocks are approaching an all time high and I didn't get any chitter-chatter in the office. I even got a--- "yeah I still don't trust them". So I will say that the lay population is still uneasy. I wasn't around during the whole late 90's stock market frenzy but there is definitely no frenzy at the workplace.MnD wrote:Having sold in a fairly significant way on three occasions since the bottom to adhere to my AA through re-balancing I am less troubled by this headline.
No-one personally has told me lately that they are "getting in".
When that inevitably happens I'll grimace, wish them good luck with that and check my AA again to make sure I'm not overweight equity.
- HardKnocker
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 11:55 am
- Location: New Jersey USA
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
Sometimes it's good to hang on and ride the wave.
Who knows? We might have another 5 years of "irrational exuberance".
Who knows? We might have another 5 years of "irrational exuberance".
“Gold gets dug out of the ground, then we melt it down, dig another hole, bury it again and pay people to stand around guarding it. It has no utility.”--Warren Buffett
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
I concur with this. The buy high sell low crowd aren't comfortable diving in quite yet.awval999 wrote:I will say this. I randomly, in passing, mentioned stocks are approaching an all time high and I didn't get any chitter-chatter in the office. I even got a--- "yeah I still don't trust them". So I will say that the lay population is still uneasy. I wasn't around during the whole late 90's stock market frenzy but there is definitely no frenzy at the workplace.
I'll be curious when they do, what the equivalent will be to Janus Funds, Scudder Ultra and QQQ that will be touting.
70/30 AA for life, Global market cap equity. Rebalance if fixed income <25% or >35%. Weighted ER< .10%. 5% of annual portfolio balance SWR, Proportional (to AA) withdrawals.
Re: Does this headline trouble you?
So, we're where we were five years ago. And...
The market goes up and down, just like it always has and always will; rallies and corrects - repeat.
One thing interesting, is that money just started leaving bond funds.
The market goes up and down, just like it always has and always will; rallies and corrects - repeat.
One thing interesting, is that money just started leaving bond funds.
"The stock market is a giant distraction from the business of investing." - Jack Bogle