Jay69 wrote:For those who have PMA with Wells Fargo they are changing the PMA program April 1st and the free trades will be gone.
retiredjg wrote:If all you want is Vanguard funds or ETFs, I wouldn't bother. You don't need a WT brokerage account for that.
billern wrote:I was thinking about opening a traditional IRA now and funding it for 2012 to qualify for the free trades going forward (right now I have a rollover IRA, a Roth IRA, and taxable account with Wells). The only downside to that is that Wells has a fairly hefty account closure fee that applies to retirement accounts.
I'd just make sure they don't close it out due to inactivity. Buy a share of a stock or ETF.
Jay69 wrote:At this point we do not need a Brokerage account but will most likely in 2-3 years.
For those who have PMA with Wells Fargo they are changing the PMA program April 1st and the free trades will be gone.
livesoft wrote:One issue would be the account closure fee. You would hate to have a fee of about $100 to close an account with just $500 in it.
Jay69 wrote:retiredjg wrote:If all you want is Vanguard funds or ETFs, I wouldn't bother. You don't need a WT brokerage account for that.
The above is one thing that has me on the fence.
I'm liking every thing togather right now, its a tough call.
In short, it was a teaser deal. There are two possible reactions:Jay69 wrote:At this point we do not need a Brokerage account but will most likely in 2-3 years.
For those who have PMA with Wells Fargo they are changing the PMA program April 1st and the free trades will be gone.
Easy Rhino wrote:b) Wells Fargo may eventually 'ungrandfather' PMA people.
nisiprius wrote:In short, it was a teaser deal.
nisiprius wrote:a) Say "this is a company that seduces customers and then abandons them. This is a reason not to trust them, and to prefer a company that seems to have a history of consistent policies."
Calm Man wrote:Jay69 wrote:retiredjg wrote:If all you want is Vanguard funds or ETFs, I wouldn't bother. You don't need a WT brokerage account for that.
The above is one thing that has me on the fence.
I'm liking every thing togather right now, its a tough call.
I wouldn't open any brokerage account anywhere. I happen to have one at Vanguard by default when I opened a Vanguard advantage account. I did use it to write checks years ago but now write checks from my bank as I don't like to mix my investment and checking accounts. I have never used the brokerage account. THhe advantage of not having one is that you will never be tempted to do anything other than use mutual funds. ETFs from Vanguard offer nothing over admiral shares (although a few funds have ETFs and not admiral shares) and require you to have to actively place bids to ge3t shares as opposed to just buying at the price Vanguard gives for a mutual fund at 4 PM.

tfb wrote:At low commission rates for Bogleheads who don't trade much, free trades are not worth as much as signup bonuses. If you are going to open a new account, you might as well open one with a firm that pays you.
retiredjg wrote:If opening a brokerage account before April allows you to keep free trades in all future accounts, I'd probably do it if you see a future need for it and don't mind whatever you have to do to get it.
Sbashore wrote:I'm an existing PMA customer with Wells Trade. I hold all my investments in Vanguard ETF's. I'd just as soon be with Vanguard. Even though I have a lot of free trades available, I don't use them much.
Default User BR wrote:Sbashore wrote:I'm an existing PMA customer with Wells Trade. I hold all my investments in Vanguard ETF's. I'd just as soon be with Vanguard. Even though I have a lot of free trades available, I don't use them much.
Presumably you have significant assets (or the PMA wouldn't make much sense). A move to TD Ameritrade for the bonus and NTF ETFs might be in order.
Brian
Default User BR wrote:tfb wrote:At low commission rates for Bogleheads who don't trade much, free trades are not worth as much as signup bonuses. If you are going to open a new account, you might as well open one with a firm that pays you.
That's kind of what I concluded. I left WF for TD Ameritrade for the bonuses. As most of my portfolio was ETFs, and all but a couple were on the TDA NTF list, I didn't even lose much flexibility.
Subsequent to that, I moved out of TDA to ETrade, Schwab, and Fidelity to collect more bonuses and a few months free transaction. I figure even if you have to pay a few commissions after the free period expires it's peanuts compared to the bonus amount. This works best when you have significant assets, as the work of moving is about the same. Collecting a $1000 bonus takes about as much time and effort as $100.
Brian
Cash wrote:Did your transfers involve a taxable account? The biggest impediment for me would be the potential loss of tax lot information.
Cash wrote:I hadn't really considered brokerage bonus chasing, but it seems simple enough to transfer in kind, and tfb makes a good point about the bonuses outweighing free trades. Did your transfers involve a taxable account? The biggest impediment for me would be the potential loss of tax lot information.
Cash wrote:If I'm transferring a combination of IRA and taxable money, can I instruct them (I'm thinking specifically of TD Ameritrade) to credit the bonus to my IRA and not taxable account?
Return to Investing - Help with Personal Investments
Users browsing this forum: avalpert, Bing [Bot], Bull Moose, frazidb, gerrym51, GregV, heytheresrich, HomerJ, Honobob, nfldoc, pkcrafter, xfactorx and 75 guests