livesoft wrote:The expense ratios of the funds in our 401(k) plans are practically an order of magnitude off your scale.
dlpmpls wrote:Well if you weight my ...inflation rate for 2007 of 2% that equals 5% in total costs and isn't that what really counts, total costs.
zhiwiller wrote:Am I an anomaly here or are only the rock bottom people posting? My average expense ratio per M* is 0.49%. This is likely due to the funds in my 401k. The S&P index in there is 0.39% itself and it gets worse from there. If I had a little more bonds (PTRAX is my choice there), I'd tip over the 0.5% mark.
rws wrote:zhiwiller wrote:Am I an anomaly here or are only the rock bottom people posting? My average expense ratio per M* is 0.49%. This is likely due to the funds in my 401k. The S&P index in there is 0.39% itself and it gets worse from there. If I had a little more bonds (PTRAX is my choice there), I'd tip over the 0.5% mark.
We're in similar boats.
From M*:
401(k): 1.14%
IRA: 0.21%
Total ER: 0.55%
The 401(k) only offers managed funds with ERs from 0.80 to 1.31%, where closer to 1.31 is the norm. My IRA is currently in a target retirement fund and I moved from T.Rowe (0.74% ER) to Vanguard this year. So, I'm getting there.
woof755 wrote:Brutal. Pick the fund in your 401(k) that has the lowest ER and still fits in your asset allocation, and do everything else in your IRA.
grberry wrote:I wish there was a law requiring 401K plans to allow employees to do in service rollover transactions, even if only once a year.
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General