

tetractys wrote:OK, seriously, are there ANY watches available that have REAL sun and moon phases built in. I've NEVER seen one; only with a kind of facsimile that didn't actually work. If there was such a watch, I might even think about it!HBD, Tet
stratton wrote:What's the least expensive watch that might have the same quality time innards as a $5K watch?
Paul
Where has Petrocelli been? Haven't seen his posts in at least a month.
yobria wrote:The purpose of $5,000 watches to to show status within the social hierarchy. .... Personally I wish our culture could find cheaper ways to show status, elaborate head dresses for example. Then we could use resources for more rational purposes, like [pick the good cause of your choice].
kcyahoo wrote:So, I scanned this thread:
2) I miss the point of wearing a clunky looking analog watch (this includes most of the analog watches mentioned here). But to each his own.
5) Oh Oh, now I have to psychoanalyze myself as to why I wrote this post.
Avo wrote:yobria wrote:The purpose of $5,000 watches to to show status within the social hierarchy. .... Personally I wish our culture could find cheaper ways to show status, elaborate head dresses for example. Then we could use resources for more rational purposes, like [pick the good cause of your choice].
Won't work. If headdresses showed status instead of watches, the title of this thread would be "Best headdress for around $5000?"
sschullo wrote:Car, career, property, clothes, how you verbally communicate and that wrist watch reflect social status and status is very important to some people.
Opponent Process wrote:right, the whole point is an extravagant display in terms of the local culture, assuming you're trying to mate within that culture. in some cultures, the watch wouldn't mean anything, but a barn full of yams would secure the best wives. the women might even think you're an idiot for even wearing a watch, as you could just look up at the sun. to US women, a barn full of yams means little, and head dresses mean little compared to the extensive conditioning they've received for jewelry.
Opponent Process wrote:sschullo wrote:Car, career, property, clothes, how you verbally communicate and that wrist watch reflect social status and status is very important to some people.
right, and it's important to note that easily-noticed displays of wealth are very important. a potential mate will be able to notice these in this order:
watch > car >> property >>>>> career
so males can often achieve a mating opportunity by simply having the watch; it quickly signals the potential for having the other stuff, and some females will copulate long before figuring out they've been had, so to speak. if you go in bars, you'll find plenty of men who have the watch, and maybe the car, but probably not the career. the best strategy for women is to try to drag the interaction out long enough to surveil the situation better.
VictoriaF wrote: The best strategy for women is to ask to see the yams first.
Victoria
Popeye wrote:I yam what I yam!
Opponent Process wrote:sschullo wrote:Car, career, property, clothes, how you verbally communicate and that wrist watch reflect social status and status is very important to some people.
right, and it's important to note that easily-noticed displays of wealth are very important. a potential mate will be able to notice these in this order:
watch > car >> property >>>>> career
so males can often achieve a mating opportunity by simply having the watch; it quickly signals the potential for having the other stuff, and some females will copulate long before figuring out they've been had, so to speak. if you go in bars, you'll find plenty of men who have the watch, and maybe the car, but probably not the career. the best strategy for women is to try to drag the interaction out long enough to surveil the situation better.
dratkinson wrote:Okay, I get it. We advertise for a woman who wants to spend money by buying a watch that advertises we have the money... for them to spend.
But what do we buy/advertise if we want a woman who is more frugal than we are? Someone who would be appalled at the thought of spending $5K for a watch... even if they/we had it. A nice suit... with no jewelry?
When I must, I wear a stainless steel Timex Indiglo, with no plan to return to anything more expensive.
Rocket, CFP wrote:You are the type person I do not like.
XtremeSki2001 wrote:And what if you've already got the girl and buy the watch after meeting her?
XtremeSki2001 wrote:I think everyone places value on things differently and I think everyone has something they especially value. I enjoy skiing and traveling so that's where the bulk of my money goes. Say I have a friend who values watches and chooses to spend his money on watches over traveling or skiing or something else. Who am I to judge him and criticize what he values and make sweeping generalizations about why he values something different than I?
XtremeSki2001 wrote:... just playing devil's advocate ...
The Hatter was the first to break the silence. 'What day of the month is it?' he said, turning to Alice: he had taken his watch out of his pocket, and was looking at it uneasily, shaking it every now and then, and holding it to his ear.
Alice considered a little, and then said 'The fourth.'
'Two days wrong!' sighed the Hatter. 'I told you butter wouldn't suit the works!' he added looking angrily at the March Hare.
'It was the BEST butter,' the March Hare meekly replied.
'Yes, but some crumbs must have got in as well,' the Hatter grumbled: 'you shouldn't have put it in with the bread-knife.'
The March Hare took the watch and looked at it gloomily: then he dipped it into his cup of tea, and looked at it again: but he could think of nothing better to say than his first remark, 'It was the BEST butter, you know.'
Alice had been looking over his shoulder with some curiosity. 'What a funny watch!' she remarked. 'It tells the day of the month, and doesn't tell what o'clock it is!'
'Why should it?' muttered the Hatter. 'Does YOUR watch tell you what year it is?'
'Of course not,' Alice replied very readily: 'but that's because it stays the same year for such a long time together.'
'Which is just the case with MINE,' said the Hatter.
Alice felt dreadfully puzzled. The Hatter's remark seemed to have no sort of meaning in it, and yet it was certainly English.
Opponent Process wrote:evolutionary psychology and science in general are not interested in recording or judging values of any given species. it's about observing behavior. although I guess you could say the highest value is the ongoing recombination and transmission of genetic material. all motivations and actions lead to this end.
Cherokee8215 wrote:Where has Petrocelli been? Haven't seen his posts in at least a month.
manbearpig wrote:Cherokee8215 wrote:Where has Petrocelli been? Haven't seen his posts in at least a month.
Posting at M*:
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSocialize/blogs/rpetrocelli/archive/2010/02/20/Bogleheads.org_3A00_-3-Years-of-Discussing-_2200_Crap_2200_.aspx
wbond wrote:manbearpig wrote:Cherokee8215 wrote:Where has Petrocelli been? Haven't seen his posts in at least a month.
Posting at M*:
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSocialize/blogs/rpetrocelli/archive/2010/02/20/Bogleheads.org_3A00_-3-Years-of-Discussing-_2200_Crap_2200_.aspx
That post of his is side-splittingly funny. A must read for all posters here.
manbearpig wrote:Cherokee8215 wrote:Where has Petrocelli been? Haven't seen his posts in at least a month.
Posting at M*:
http://socialize.morningstar.com/NewSocialize/blogs/rpetrocelli/archive/2010/02/20/Bogleheads.org_3A00_-3-Years-of-Discussing-_2200_Crap_2200_.aspx
Opponent Process wrote:right, the whole point is an extravagant display in terms of the local culture, assuming you're trying to mate within that culture. in some cultures, the watch wouldn't mean anything, but a barn full of yams would secure the best wives. the women might even think you're an idiot for even wearing a watch, as you could just look up at the sun. to US women, a barn full of yams means little, and head dresses mean little compared to the extensive conditioning they've received for jewelry.
Random Musings wrote:Another amusing thread by Petro.....
Saving a 20-yr old
Has a good point - there has to be balance in life.
RM
baw703916 wrote:VictoriaF wrote: The best strategy for women is to ask to see the yams first.
VictoriaPopeye wrote:I yam what I yam!
I wonder if Olive Oyl misinterpreted that statement?![]()
Brad
daydreamin wrote:I would recommend investing in a gym membership, a guitar, and maybe some cooking lessons before the watch. Girls love a guy with big biceps who can sing and feed them.
LesterFreamon wrote:[snip]You can't take it with you, and after saving for retirement, paying taxes, providing for your children and family, what are you supposed to do with money? [snip]
nisiprius wrote:Is that the model James Bond favored... in the books... because he could slide it up over his hand and use it like a set of brass knuckles?thekro wrote:I have a 1972 rolex submariner that I bought many years ago to use when I went scuba diving. It really doesnt keep as good time as Quartz Movement watches. I hardly ever wear the rolex because it is heavy and not really comfortable...
Gekko wrote:not based on personal experience (i bought a real luxury watch) but this site looks interesting -
http://www.ireplicastore.com/product.ph ... &Product=3
the Submariner SS with date and black face looks the best IMO. it's one of the most popular Rolex watches, the easiest to accurately copy, and one of the longest copied - hence, the replica makers have its reproduction down to a science. the specs/details listed look good too. $114.50 seems like a reasonable price.
disclaimer - i do not advocate or condone the buying or selling of a replica watch.
Return to Personal Consumer Issues
Users browsing this forum: lightheir, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 35 guests