There are three objectives of this paper. First, we explain the current structure of Social Security retirement benefits. Professionals who advise individual investors should
have knowledge of the benefits structure. With this knowledge, they can add value to clients by helping them decide when to begin receiving benefits. Second, we provide models to estimate the present value of expected Social Security retirement benefits. These models rely on the similarities between inflation- linked Treasury bonds and Social Security. Third, we
demonstrate that including the value of Social Security benefits can substantially change the calculation of the current asset mix.
This chapter argues that previous research on Social Security take-up alternatives has failed to recognize critical factors that greatly impact the discussion on when it is most beneficial to start Social Security retirement benefits. We show that the effect of taxes can have a dramatic effect on the financial security of retirees, yet the taxation caused by IRA withdrawals and the interaction with Social Security has been largely misunderstood. In addition, changes made under the Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2000 make delaying Social Security for married couples much more favorable. We also show how the traditional approach of starting Social Security benefits early and deriving income from stock and bond mutual funds is expected to under-perform a strategy that takes income from personal retirement assets first and is followed by increased benefits from Social Security.
* The reduction in Social Security benefits due to early retirement at age 62 is greater than often realized.
* When calculating how much benefits will be reduced by retiring as early as age 62, observers often underestimate the reduction because they fail to account for the annual cost-of-living adjustments and make other incorrect assumptions relative to the reduction.
* The article explains how Social Security calculates a worker’s “average indexed monthly wage” and how the primary insurance amount is in turn calculated from that, using “bend points.”
* An accurate calculation of early retirement benefits is also key to spousal benefits, because a reduction of benefits for the primary worker may affect the amount of benefits the spouse receives both during the marriage and after the worker’s death.
* One of the subjective arguments for collecting Social Security benefits early is that if death occurs before normal retirement age, no retirement benefits are collected. But a 62-year-old male has more than a 93 percent chance of living to normal retirement age, and a couple has more than a 99 percent chance that one of them will reach normal retirement age.
* A spreadsheet calculates the break-even point for the age at which total benefits from an early retirement and normal retirement age are equal.
* Unless early retirement is “mandated” due to health reasons, it appears one should wait until normal retirement age or later to begin collecting Social Security.
* Planners must frequently advise clients on the future economic effects of the timing of collecting Social Security benefits. In addition to such factors as the client’s health and financial status, the timing decision frequently depends on determining the break-even age, which is defined as that age when total revenues from Social Security will be equal regardless of the elective start of those benefits.
* This paper provides a freely available spreadsheet for planners for specifically determining the break-even ages between taking benefits at the normal retirement age and age 70, when taking benefits becomes mandatory and there is no economic benefit from further delay.
* The paper looks at three options for a worker who decides to continue working past normal retirement age, or has other adequate sources for retirement income, but takes the benefit at the normal retirement age: (1) always spend the after-tax amount, (2) always invest the after-tax amount, or (3) invest the after-tax benefits until age 70 and then make monthly withdrawals from the accumulated fund.
* Under the first option, most workers with normal life expectancy would be better off financially to delay taking the benefits. The second option of investing the money is investigated under different after-tax-return scenarios. Generally, it pays to begin taking benefits at normal retirement age. Under the third option, building an accumulating fund until age 70, then to be depleted monthly, will produce a shortfall if the worker lives beyond the break-even age.
* This paper summarizes the incentives facing older women when deciding when to claim their Social Security benefits. Nearly 60 percent of women opt for actuarially reduced benefits at age 62—a greater percentage than men. Yet women are expected to live longer than men. Longer life expectancy would generally suggest delaying Social Security benefits. But the analysis shows that single women and married women face very different choices.
* Married women are entitled to three types of benefits: (1) benefits based on their own earning records, (2) spouse's benefits based on their husband's earning records, or (3) survivor's benefit equal to 100 percent of their husband's benefits. These benefits are reduced if claimed earlier than the full retirement age.
* From the authors' study, two key points emerge. First, in the case of survivors' benefits, the husband usually can maximize the benefits of the couple or his surviving wife by delaying his claim.
* Second, the wife is usually better off claiming her own Social Security benefits as early as possible, though this can change depending what percentage her own benefits are of her husband's benefits.
* For most married women, the Social Security benefit structure actually encourages them to grab their benefits as soon as possible. While this may maximize the wife's Social Security "wealth," it also encourages them to withdraw from the labor force, creating a loss of earnings and 401(k) savings, and extending the period over which they need to support themselves in retirement
* Social Security's windfall elimination provision (WEP) reduces Social Security retirement benefits for those workers, typically employed in the public sector, covered by a non-Social Security retirement plan and who became first eligible for that non-Social Security plan after 1985.
* It is estimated that up to 9 percent of future retirees may be affected by the provision. As a rule of thumb, essentially all workers who have paid into the Social Security system for less than 30 working years at "substantial earnings" and have worked in the public sector in non-Social Security positions are likely to have their Social Security retirement benefits reduced by the WEP.
* Current annual Social Security benefit statements overstate the worker's estimated benefits by not reflecting any potential WEP reduction. Accordingly, financial planners should be aware of the potential reduction and how it works to reduce the monthly benefits that clients may receive.
* It is particularly important to factor in the WEP for those clients who have 20 or fewer years of substantial earnings, as the WEP reduction for these individuals is far more pronounced.
* This article describes the WEP and its workings through a detailed example. It shows how to estimate Social Security retirement benefits, upon which any potential WEP impact must be based, with a quick yet accurate back-of-the-envelope calculation.
* The article also discusses the fact that workers who leave the private sector for a non-Social Security covered position may well lose their Social Security disability coverage that requires current Social Security work credits to remain in force.
ThePrune wrote:Most folks get an annual "Your Social Security Statement" each year. On page 2 of this mailing are a number of estimated (extrapolated) benefit dollar amounts.
It would be useful for the Wiki Social Security article to discuss how to use these dollar amounts for retirement planning. In particular, I think folks should be be reminded that:
(1) These dollar amounts assume that there is NO CHANGE in the Average Wage Index (AWI) going into the future. [But historically the annual AWI increase has been about 5%.] This assumption strongly influences the AIME and Bend Point amounts required to calculate the PIA.
(2) These dollar amounts assume that there is NO CHANGE in the CPI-W Index going into the future. Same as assuming 0% annual COLAs. [But historically the COLA has run about 3.5%.] This influences the calculation of the dollar benefit amounts received after age 62.
(3) These dollar amounts assume that the worker continues to have the same amount of SS taxable earnings for each year going into the future, right up to the year that SS benefits are started.
All three of these assumptions are commonly violated, and this strongly influences the projected SS benefits that would be calculated starting with these dollar amounts.
http://andrewgbiggs.blogspot.com/2008/0 ... urity.htmlThe short story is that the statement tends to underestimate future benefits by about 1.1% (the rate of real wage growth ) for each year between the time you receive the statement and the time you'll retire. So if the statement projects you'll receive around $1,000 per month and you're currently 45 years old, the best guess of your true scheduled benefits would be around $1,245.
One way to think about it is that the statement's projections would be accurate if we switched today from wage indexing to price indexing of initial benefits.
Cb wrote:I thought John Greaney's analysis of starting SS at 62, then repaying & restarting at 70 was interesting:
"A little-known Social Security provision effectively allows you to "purchase" a life annuity from the Social Security administration at a substantial discount to what a commercial insurer would charge for the same monthly benefit. Delaying taking Social Security benefits until age 70 gives a retiree a monthly check as much as 77% larger than a retiree who started taking benefits at age 62. But you don't have to delay taking benefits until age 70 to take advantage of this. The Social Security Administration allows you to "withdraw your application" for benefits, reapply at a later date, and get the same larger monthly check as someone who delayed taking Social Security until that age. Of course, you'll have to pay back all the Social Security benefits you've received to date, but you won't have to pay back interest on the money and you'll be eligible for either a tax deduction or tax credit on the income taxes you paid on the Social Security benefits collected to date. If you save and invest the Social Security benefits you collect from age 62 to age 69 and then reapply at age 70 for the larger monthly benefit, you'll likely have tens of thousands of dollars in after-tax earnings beyond the amount that you repay to the Social Security Administration."
December 08, 2010 Breaking News
-- The Social Security Administration issued new rules today that end
the Withdrawal of Application strategy, effective immediately., see link.
kate1234 wrote:It is not only in the links, but also is the first comment on the page we are on: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=6043
That's what I read and then followed the embedded link
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests