Bogleheads.org

by **LadyGeek** » Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:09 pm

hi... check it now. Welcome to the forum.

by **SSSS** » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:05 pm

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━━┻

(ﾉಥ益ಥ）ﾉ ┻━━┻

by **wiggy** » Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:36 pm

Test 1

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:26 am

deleted

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:38 am

deleted

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:42 am

http://globalquote.morningstar.com/glob ... 26:::B:USA

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:24 pm

deleted

by **LadyGeek** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:13 pm

Use the IMG_resize button, 2nd one from the right at the top of the edit box. I set the width to 40%. Quote my post to see how it's done.

Update: Image resize fix, post updated to %.

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:46 pm

LadyGeek wrote:Use the IMG_resize button, 2nd one from the right at the top of the edit box. I set the width to 40% pixels. Quote my post to see how it's done.

[Image resize fixed, I modified the post to avoid large images (40%). --admin LadyGeek]

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:47 pm

[quote="LadyGeek"]Use the IMG_resize button, 2nd one from the right at the top of the edit box. I set the width to 400 pixels. Quote my post to see how it's done.[quote]

Is that 400 the number of pixels or the % difference? [See post below. --admin LadyGeek]

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:48 pm

LadyGeek wrote:Use the IMG_resize button, 2nd one from the right at the top of the edit box. I set the width to 400 pixels. Quote my post to see how it's done.

by **Jerilynn** » Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:56 pm

[Image resize fixed, post modified to 40% to avoid large images. --admin LadyGeek]

by **dratkinson** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 4:15 pm

LadyGeek wrote:Use the IMG_resize button, 2nd one from the right at the top of the edit box. I set the width to 400 pixels. Quote my post to see how it's done.

So, if I set image size to 200 (I did), shouldn't the same image be half the original width, either shrunk in size or truncated? It does not appear to be so.
[Image resize fixed, post modified to avoid large images (2nd image at 20%). --admin LadyGeek]

by **LadyGeek** » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:54 pm

It should be height in % (not pixels) :oops:

but it's not working for me, either. What you're probably seeing is the forum software's best guess on how to scale the image to fit within the post. I'll take a look.

by **LadyGeek** » Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:36 pm

I looked, it's fixed. Thanks for the help.

Sorry, but I had to modify a few posts. Otherwise, we'd now be seeing images at 400% :shock:

(I entered comments on what I did).

by **Texas Green** » Thu Jan 03, 2013 9:30 pm

This is a test :moneybag

Me

by **MickeyBoy** » Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:35 pm

I think my question is this:

Are not domestic Large Value stocks safer than Large Blends or Large Growths?

The common notion is that the value premium exists at the cost of increased volatility (sigma or Std deviation.) While likely true for mids and smalls, is this true to the same extent for the very largest stocks?

A subquestion: To the extent that this is true, as one approaches retirement, should there be a tilt toward Large Value stocks?

TIA for any comments.

by **Frank2012** » Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:31 pm

This is a test post :happy

by **pennstater2005** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:04 am

deleted

by **pennstater2005** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:05 am

deleted

by **Ruby** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:33 pm

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/822/ramgrid.gif/

by **LadyGeek** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:51 pm

Ruby wrote:http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/822/ramgrid.gif/

If you right-click on the image, a direct link will come up. Then, enclose it with the Img tags (Img button):

Code: Select all: [img]http://imageshack.us/a/img822/2574/ramgrid.gif[/img]

Will produce:

Wiki article link: Posting images in the Bogleheads forum

by **protagonist** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:59 pm

tfb wrote:[The moderator has "stickied" this thread to put at the top every time the forum is displayed. If you want to try out some forum feature, use this thread for your test posts.]

Note: Test posts may be deleted after the poster has a chance to see that everything is working. So make sure you have a copy of anything you post here that you want to save.

The is a test post for the purpose of demonstrating the features of the new board.

1. Including a link is easy. No more entering html code. Just paste the link url. That's it! For example, here's a link to Vanguard home page:

http://www.vanguard.com

2. Formatting text is easy. Just highlight a block of text, hit the 'B' button for bold, 'i' for italics, 'u' for underline. For example:

Vanguard Diehards Forum

by **Epsilon Delta** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:41 pm

What the image should look like:

Full 1200 x 1170 pixel image

by **LadyGeek** » Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:20 pm

FYI - The image resizing feature has been removed. Images up to 1200 x 1200 pixels are permitted (an increase over the old limit of 900 pixels). See this post: Re: "Your images may only be up to 900 pixels wide."

Update: The resize image option is back, but will only display at full size. The intent is to avoid breaking posts which used the [img_resize=xx][/img_resize] feature. If anyone has a problem with an image, use the report post "!" in the top right corner and we'll take a look at it.

by **nisiprius** » Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:09 pm

This image is about 1024 pixels wide.

by **BorisTheSpider** » Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:40 am

This is only a test :beer

by **Sylvester the Investor** » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:27 pm

test2

by **Sylvester the Investor** » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:28 pm

bbfoc Android

by **Splais** » Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:06 pm

how now brown cow.

cow brown how now

by **xram** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 8:01 am

ETF = VBR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -0.20%
02 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.54%
03 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -0.84%
04 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.36%
05 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -2.27%
06 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -2.25%
07 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -2.15%
08 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.67%
09 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.66%
10 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.45%
11 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -2.16%
12 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.38%
13 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.64%
14 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -2.07%
15 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.97%
16 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -1.00%
17 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -0.58%
18 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -0.86%
19 _Day_Cumulative_Change = -0.70%
20 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.05%
------------------------------------------------------------
40 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 2.80%
------------------------------------------------------------
60 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 7.22%
------------------------------------------------------------
90 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 15.28%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

by **gkaplan** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:57 pm

Is there a point to this?

by **xram** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 2:00 pm

gkaplan wrote:Is there a point to this?

Seriously?, in the "please test posts here thread?"
Wow....Wow.........

by **LadyGeek** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 4:59 pm

I just tested my post removal feature. :wink:

If you have any further problems, just ask.

by **xram** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 5:42 pm

ETF = BND
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.27%
02 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.56%
03 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.62%
04 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.63%
05 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.73%
06 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.74%
07 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.95%
08 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.98%
09 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.97%
10 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.06%
11 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.08%
12 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.99%
13 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.06%
14 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.24%
15 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.36%
16 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.39%
17 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.27%
18 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.47%
19 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.42%
20 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.14%
------------------------------------------------------------
40 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 1.20%
------------------------------------------------------------
60 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + 0.93%
------------------------------------------------------------
90 _Day_Cumulative_Change = + -0.00%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Just testing how to format

by **xram** » Sat Apr 06, 2013 9:58 pm

12345

by **bltkmt** » Wed Apr 17, 2013 12:53 pm

Test post

by **NightOwl** » Tue May 14, 2013 11:51 pm

Pasting Excel Table Test

Code: Select all: A B C 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64

Text here.

by **NightOwl** » Tue May 14, 2013 11:55 pm

NightOwl wrote:Pasting Excel Table Test

Code: Select all
A B C 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64 34 56 64

Text here.

[*]

Who is online