Dying with $1 in Pocket
Dying with $1 in Pocket
FIL recently passed with a one dollar bill in his pocket. Due to some nagging on my part, a power of attorney and will were in place. His social security stopped before his last bills could be paid--he had a shell game going for what bills he paid and when, not one penny saved. All those treasures he spent most of his last few year's of income on got hauled to the dump.
I am begging all of you readers to simplify, organize, and throw away the clutter before you get too old and sick to deal with your "stuff". And save more money than you think you will need, social security is not enough to live on. Also why you're of sound mind think of different options for living out your later years (especially with ill health).
I am begging all of you readers to simplify, organize, and throw away the clutter before you get too old and sick to deal with your "stuff". And save more money than you think you will need, social security is not enough to live on. Also why you're of sound mind think of different options for living out your later years (especially with ill health).
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Your father-in-law won the game. I aspire to spend my last dollar and then die too, but it's very hard to time that exactly.Skiffy wrote:FIL recently passed with a one dollar bill in his pocket. His social security stopped before his last bills could be paid--he had a shell game going for what bills he paid and when, not one penny saved.
- danwhite77
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:21 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
A good message, but I think you're preaching to the choir here.
"While some mutual fund founders chose to make billions, he chose to make a difference." - Dedication to Jack Bogle in 'The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing'.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Yup. There are MANY in my circle of family and friends who are cheering and clapping for him. He did indeed win the game. Maybe he's right and we are all wrong.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
What exactly is wrong with dying with $1 in your pocket? Heirs are not owed an inheritance. You are entitled to nothing. If he lived a good life and was happy in his last years with his trinkets, good for him.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
No, it is very easy to exactly time that. Most of us don't want to.WendyW wrote:Your father-in-law won the game. I aspire to spend my last dollar and then die too, but it's very hard to time that exactly.Skiffy wrote:FIL recently passed with a one dollar bill in his pocket. His social security stopped before his last bills could be paid--he had a shell game going for what bills he paid and when, not one penny saved.
"Index funds have a place in your portfolio, but you'll never beat the index with them." - Words of wisdom from a Fidelity rep
- market timer
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 1:42 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I might do this by annuitizing everything.momar wrote:No, it is very easy to exactly time that. Most of us don't want to.WendyW wrote:Your father-in-law won the game. I aspire to spend my last dollar and then die too, but it's very hard to time that exactly.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I wonder what's more difficult, annuitizing or pulling the plug.market timer wrote:I might do this by annuitizing everything.momar wrote:No, it is very easy to exactly time that. Most of us don't want to.WendyW wrote:Your father-in-law won the game. I aspire to spend my last dollar and then die too, but it's very hard to time that exactly.
Victoria
Inventor of the Bogleheads Secret Handshake |
Winner of the 2015 Boglehead Contest. |
Every joke has a bit of a joke. ... The rest is the truth. (Marat F)
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.mathwhiz wrote:What exactly is wrong with dying with $1 in your pocket? Heirs are not owed an inheritance. You are entitled to nothing. If he lived a good life and was happy in his last years with his trinkets, good for him.
Then again, I guess they could just literally leave the mess for someone else to clean up and leave the body in the morgue until the city disposes of him at the taxpayers expense.
I guess you can call it winning when you dump your expenses/problems on someone else.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Winning! [OT comment removed by admin LadyGeek]nordlead wrote:you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Years ago my parents advised me not to count on any inheritance (other than household items and such). I'm not sure if they were joking or serious at the time, but my bet is on serious.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
OP, forgive the snarky responses above. Your language ("dying with $1 in pocket") triggered a POSITIVE notion in the heads of many --- that of saving exactly enough to get through your life and not a penny more. Your language is incorrect in that your FIL actually died "owing" money --- he was unable to save enough such that the rest of his family wasn't picking up the tab for him, hauling away his possessions, paying for funeral expenses, etc. Nobody here wants that, and your warning is spot on. Nothing in your post suggests that you were hoping for some big check to come your way, but rather that you would have liked to have avoided paying for another person's carelessness. I hope that surprise bills don't keep showing up.
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
My primary residence is worth a few hundred $K.
I may relocate to a different residence, but still with the approximate same value.
Since I'm totally disinclined to fool with a reverse mortgage, it's unlikely I'll be able to dig a deep enough hole to die penniless...
I may relocate to a different residence, but still with the approximate same value.
Since I'm totally disinclined to fool with a reverse mortgage, it's unlikely I'll be able to dig a deep enough hole to die penniless...
Attempted new signature...
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I don't think its "winning" when you leave your heirs with bills to pay and/or creditors with balances to eat, and junk to throw out. A net zero might be winning.
Last edited by BigFoot48 on Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Retired |
Two-time in top-10 in Bogleheads S&P500 contest; 18-time loser
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
The perfect is the enemy of the good enough.BigFoot48 wrote:I don't think its "winning" when you leave your heirs with bills to pay and junk to throw out. A net zero might be winning.
Victoria
Inventor of the Bogleheads Secret Handshake |
Winner of the 2015 Boglehead Contest. |
Every joke has a bit of a joke. ... The rest is the truth. (Marat F)
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
For me, the worst-case scenario is living modestly until age 65, and then dying suddenly and leaving my siblings/nieces/nephews a couple million bucks.Leesbro63 wrote:Yup. There are MANY in my circle of family and friends who are cheering and clapping for him. He did indeed win the game. Maybe he's right and we are all wrong.
-
- Posts: 2519
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:05 pm
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Serious question - what happens to those who have no heirs? do outstanding amounts get written off as bad debt by the credit grantor? does the county send its employees in to haul stuff to the county dump and then sell off the property or revert it back to the landlord?
I was recently at a class reunion party where the discussion turned to finance - some admit they have nothing saved for retirement - and these people are around 52 years old.
Some admit to spending all the money they had saved for retirement on their children's college bills.
In short, they have nothing. I remained mum during the conversation, but as i left, I couldn't help but wonder what lies down the road for these folks.
Presumably, they will continue working as long as they are physically able, collect Social Security when they are able and eek by until the end? what other way lies ahead for those who have no retirement provisions? at some point, it seems they will have to throw themselves fully on the mercy of society, this is not a political statement, but a reality.?
BFG
I was recently at a class reunion party where the discussion turned to finance - some admit they have nothing saved for retirement - and these people are around 52 years old.
Some admit to spending all the money they had saved for retirement on their children's college bills.
In short, they have nothing. I remained mum during the conversation, but as i left, I couldn't help but wonder what lies down the road for these folks.
Presumably, they will continue working as long as they are physically able, collect Social Security when they are able and eek by until the end? what other way lies ahead for those who have no retirement provisions? at some point, it seems they will have to throw themselves fully on the mercy of society, this is not a political statement, but a reality.?
BFG
How many retired people does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Only one, but he takes all day.
- ResearchMed
- Posts: 16795
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 10:25 pm
*HOARDING* situation? Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
This rang a bell. Two bells.Skiffy wrote:FIL recently passed with a one dollar bill in his pocket. Due to some nagging on my part, a power of attorney and will were in place. His social security stopped before his last bills could be paid--he had a shell game going for what bills he paid and when, not one penny saved. All those treasures he spent most of his last few year's of income on got hauled to the dump.
I am begging all of you readers to simplify, organize, and throw away the clutter before you get too old and sick to deal with your "stuff". And save more money than you think you will need, social security is not enough to live on. Also why you're of sound mind think of different options for living out your later years (especially with ill health).
Second bell is that we hope to do "better". We'd rather have that last check bounce the day we die (we'd get to spend a nifty few hundred dollars more during that final month of life - Yeah! )
FIRST bell: With mention of "all those treasures".... this is more a comment to some others of here, as it's too late wrt the OP:
IF you have an elderly relative (elderly can mean over 55 or 65, not "ancient") who does or might have a *hoarding* problem, there are resources to help, so that the relative can also better enjoy those final years or months or decades.
We had a relative whose condo was VERY cluttered. (I didn't see it, or I would probably have started the process sooner, or at least tried to, as it was DH's relative.)
All kinds of warning lights were going off (getting fired with no mention to anyone). And then 2 dozen boxes of "personal items" left in the office - TWO DOZEN?? - delivered to the home. When we heard that there was no room in the condo, and mgmt. threatened to have it removed as a safety factor in the hallways, we knew it wasn't just "clutter".
Yup, there were unopened boxes and packages that money was being spent on. EVERYWHERE. Piled on EVERY surface, including the stove, mostly almost to the ceiling!
Then there was a water leak (NOT from this condo, but no one knew that at first). Relative won't answer door. Fire Department called. DISASTER. Place condemned.
THEN, with some prodding from us, Elder Affairs office of Health Department, and a bunch of other services kicked in.
The surprisingly HAPPY outcome is that after "hoarding specialists" were called in, most stuff was just "removed", and relative took advantage of the nice clean mostly/relatively empty space, and relative is MUCH happier without all that junk, new or otherwise.
AND... there is a monthly inspection by Elders at Risk (or something like that), such that if it builds up again... the hint being that relative shouldn't be living alone (i.e., non "supervised"), and that got the relative's attention!
WE HAD NO IDEA, because neither of us had been invited in for years.
We are helping with occasional groceries (social security just kicked in), and THAT will soon become dependent upon our (or DH) reviewing "where the existing money is going". If a bit of extra grocery money is needed, we'll help. But NOT if relative's own money is again being spent on "too many trinkets", etc., and another call will be made to the Elders at Risk group.
(DH uses the "I'll help bring up the groceries" as a place to look around, but not - yet - in the bedrooms. No hint relative is again sleeping in a chair because even the sofa is piled high.
BTW, I used that opportunity watch TLC (I think) series on hoarding, and I had *NO* idea what "real" hoarding can be like. And that was how bad this was.
Upsetting that we had NO IDEA...
Something to keep in mind, although trying to help dealing with it can cause more than a bit of resistance and hostility. Then it became "thanks".
RM
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
This is why annitizing a significant percentage of your accumulation early in retirement is a good idea for many. You have more income to live less modestly on.WendyW wrote:For me, the worst-case scenario is living modestly until age 65, and then dying suddenly and leaving my siblings/nieces/nephews a couple million bucks.Leesbro63 wrote:Yup. There are MANY in my circle of family and friends who are cheering and clapping for him. He did indeed win the game. Maybe he's right and we are all wrong.
But there's no helping you if you pass on 6 months before your planned retirement and your heirs receive everything...
Attempted new signature...
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Your father-in-law followed the advice of Errol Flynn:
"Any man who dies with more than $5000 is a FAILURE."
"Any man who dies with more than $5000 is a FAILURE."
-
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:53 pm
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I'm slightly disappointed with the sense of "give nothing back" I'm getting from some of these comments. Of course you don't owe your descendants or the rest of the world anything, but wouldn't it be nice to leave some wiggle room for yourself, and when it's no longer needed, bless someone who might need it? Giving to family/funds upon death are one way to win the game, too... and I believe you'd be seen as a winner through more pairs of eyes than just your own and people who believe as you do. I am a grateful beneficiary of the F. W. Olin Foundation.
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Errol Flynn died in 1959 - in 1959, $5,000 was a splendid amount to have in one's pocket, bank account or estate value.steve roy wrote:Your father-in-law followed the advice of Errol Flynn:
"Any man who dies with more than $5000 is a FAILURE."
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Didn't the father provide for his offspring to adulthood? Isn't that giving? More over I'd say it's a blessing that the father stuck around to take care of his offspring. Not sure what the F.W. Olin Foundation's mandate is.winglessangel31 wrote:I'm slightly disappointed with the sense of "give nothing back" I'm getting from some of these comments. Of course you don't owe your descendants or the rest of the world anything, but wouldn't it be nice to leave some wiggle room for yourself, and when it's no longer needed, bless someone who might need it? Giving to family/funds upon death are one way to win the game, too... and I believe you'd be seen as a winner through more pairs of eyes than just your own and people who believe as you do. I am a grateful beneficiary of the F. W. Olin Foundation.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
$5000 in 1959 is equivalent to $40,000 today.Grt2bOutdoors wrote:Errol Flynn died in 1959 - in 1959, $5,000 was a splendid amount to have in one's pocket, bank account or estate value.
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
It sounds like the father in law left the world almost exactly as he entered it - with nothing. That said, I'm sure the OP's f-i-l made plenty of positive contributions along the way. One's person trash was another person's treasure. The OP may have tossed out the man's belongings, but if it brought him enjoyment during his time here that is all that counts. Sometimes, I think this forum is too rooted in the almighty dollar. Thanksgiving is coming - how many plan on visiting stores instead of understanding the true meaning of the day? Everyday is Thanksgiving but folks are too wrapped up in things to really get it.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
-
- Posts: 25625
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:20 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Perhaps, but I'd venture to say $5K would go alot further than $40K today can. Where's Taylor Larimore or Sheepdog, I bet they can attest to what I'm saying.WendyW wrote:$5000 in 1959 is equivalent to $40,000 today.Grt2bOutdoors wrote:Errol Flynn died in 1959 - in 1959, $5,000 was a splendid amount to have in one's pocket, bank account or estate value.
"One should invest based on their need, ability and willingness to take risk - Larry Swedroe" Asking Portfolio Questions
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
If I wasn't married, I'd careless if there was a dollar left when I passed or not. There is always the mortgage free home and other items the kids will have. Other than that, I plan on spending the money I worked so hard for and saved. I didn't save and go without for so many years just to give it to the kids to blow through. In fact, if the last check bounced, it would be great timing..
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
The family isn’t responsible with the last electric bill or anything like that, it just come out of their inheritance, if they is any. So you aren’t sticking anyone with anything. The only possible costs are the funeral and that it optional. That is unless they were part of a religion that has strict burial rights, in which case, they were really really irresponsible (and risk taking) dyeing without some money. But overall you could just walk away if you want to.BigFoot48 wrote:I don't think its "winning" when you leave your heirs with bills to pay and/or creditors with balances to eat, and junk to throw out. A net zero might be winning.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I agree it's the estate's obligations alone, but disagree that you aren't sticking anyone with anything, as if you have unpaid debt you're sticking those companies/individuals/government that are owed something with something, and I for one, consider that irresponsible if assets would have otherwise been available to cover the debt.Firam wrote:The family isn’t responsible with the last electric bill or anything like that, it just come out of their inheritance, if they is any. So you aren’t sticking anyone with anything. The only possible costs are the funeral and that it optional. That is unless they were part of a religion that has strict burial rights, in which case, they were really really irresponsible (and risk taking) dyeing without some money. But overall you could just walk away if you want to.
Retired |
Two-time in top-10 in Bogleheads S&P500 contest; 18-time loser
- frugaltype
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:07 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
+1 As an executor/trustee, I can say it is a lot of work, often expensive work to close up an estate and trust. Even with zero money, and it sounds like the OP's FIL did not die even, but owing money, someone has to clear out the junk, dispose of the non-junk, any residence, car.TSR wrote:OP, forgive the snarky responses above. Your language ("dying with $1 in pocket") triggered a POSITIVE notion in the heads of many --- that of saving exactly enough to get through your life and not a penny more. Your language is incorrect in that your FIL actually died "owing" money --- he was unable to save enough such that the rest of his family wasn't picking up the tab for him, hauling away his possessions, paying for funeral expenses, etc. Nobody here wants that, and your warning is spot on. Nothing in your post suggests that you were hoping for some big check to come your way, but rather that you would have liked to have avoided paying for another person's carelessness. I hope that surprise bills don't keep showing up.
People get paid money to do that. Relatives may do it for nothing or not. But the FIL left a financial and time burden for those left behind.
- frugaltype
- Posts: 1952
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:07 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
What are you suggesting they do with his body, toss it in the backyard? Leave it to the equivalent of Potter's Field?Firam wrote:The family isn’t responsible with the last electric bill or anything like that, it just come out of their inheritance, if they is any. So you aren’t sticking anyone with anything. The only possible costs are the funeral and that it optional. That is unless they were part of a religion that has strict burial rights, in which case, they were really really irresponsible (and risk taking) dyeing without some money. But overall you could just walk away if you want to.BigFoot48 wrote:I don't think its "winning" when you leave your heirs with bills to pay and/or creditors with balances to eat, and junk to throw out. A net zero might be winning.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Sounds to me like the FIL was trying to live with only a dollar in his pocket. Doesn't seem like winning anything to me.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Of course you are right. But there are so many who don't think this way and are clapping that the deceased in this story whizzed away everything he could.winglessangel31 wrote:I'm slightly disappointed with the sense of "give nothing back" I'm getting from some of these comments. Of course you don't owe your descendants or the rest of the world anything, but wouldn't it be nice to leave some wiggle room for yourself, and when it's no longer needed, bless someone who might need it? Giving to family/funds upon death are one way to win the game, too... and I believe you'd be seen as a winner through more pairs of eyes than just your own and people who believe as you do. I am a grateful beneficiary of the F. W. Olin Foundation.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Reposting OP for context.Skiffy wrote:FIL recently passed with a one dollar bill in his pocket. Due to some nagging on my part, a power of attorney and will were in place. His social security stopped before his last bills could be paid--he had a shell game going for what bills he paid and when, not one penny saved. All those treasures he spent most of his last few year's of income on got hauled to the dump.
I am begging all of you readers to simplify, organize, and throw away the clutter before you get too old and sick to deal with your "stuff". And save more money than you think you will need, social security is not enough to live on. Also why you're of sound mind think of different options for living out your later years (especially with ill health).
FIL was nagged to at least have PoA and Will.
Paying bills was a shell game.
Spent his final years buying junk no one else valued (which I suppose is his right, but obviously the survivors see no value in this, only pathology).
Then we're begged to not become mild hoarders (or worse) and to plan ahead.
Yeah, he "won", but he won by grift.
The sewer system is a form of welfare state. |
-- "Libra", Don DeLillo
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
You are right, the people that are owned a debt are SOL, but the family is free to go.BigFoot48 wrote:I agree it's the estate's obligations alone, but disagree that you aren't sticking anyone with anything, as if you have unpaid debt you're sticking those companies/individuals/government that are owed something with something, and I for one, consider that irresponsible if assets would have otherwise been available to cover the debt.
That is an extreme example because funerals are for the living and so the survivors would want to have one. You can’t just dump people in the back yard, but you don’t have to pay for a funeral either, you can just walk away from where they died. I’m not saying that it is dignified, just that it is an option.frugaltype wrote: What are you suggesting they do with his body, toss it in the backyard? Leave it to the equivalent of Potter's Field?
Last edited by Firam on Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ResearchMed
- Posts: 16795
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 10:25 pm
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Most posters here seem to be assuming that OP's FIL was fully in control of "things".
With literally one dollar, but "All those treasures he spent most of his last few year's of income" ?
There may have been some sort of cognitive decline.
This is NOT to fault OP's family for "not noticing".
As our own first hand experience demonstrates, it is not always apparent, though sometimes it is.
People who are just starting down that sad road are still in enough control of things that they may well have developed some pretty good ways of hiding the real situation, and that's only if they recognize there is a "minor" problem in the first place. Otherwise, their behavior might still seem not that much out of the ordinary, for quite some time, even without trying to hide anything.
It's similar to "when should the aging parents no longer drive themselves"?
Trying to negotiate "you aren't safe" usually is not greeted with enthusiasm and thanks, to put it mildly.
THAT was a situation we saw developing with my parents (who lived a long distance away, so the change was more obvious - and frightening!), and it took a while to do something.
But hoarding, if one isn't inside, or the "$1" in pocket and nothing more, might well not have any obvious symptoms if the person has SOME income, and doesn't appear to be hungry or in unusually poor health, etc.
Very tricky to figure it out, because we DO have the right to our own little idiosyncrasies. If someone is functioning otherwise just fine, who are we to say that collecting those "treasures"
is "wrong"? That's not (usually) "hoarding" or a symbol of other problems.
VERY tricky...
RM
With literally one dollar, but "All those treasures he spent most of his last few year's of income" ?
There may have been some sort of cognitive decline.
This is NOT to fault OP's family for "not noticing".
As our own first hand experience demonstrates, it is not always apparent, though sometimes it is.
People who are just starting down that sad road are still in enough control of things that they may well have developed some pretty good ways of hiding the real situation, and that's only if they recognize there is a "minor" problem in the first place. Otherwise, their behavior might still seem not that much out of the ordinary, for quite some time, even without trying to hide anything.
It's similar to "when should the aging parents no longer drive themselves"?
Trying to negotiate "you aren't safe" usually is not greeted with enthusiasm and thanks, to put it mildly.
THAT was a situation we saw developing with my parents (who lived a long distance away, so the change was more obvious - and frightening!), and it took a while to do something.
But hoarding, if one isn't inside, or the "$1" in pocket and nothing more, might well not have any obvious symptoms if the person has SOME income, and doesn't appear to be hungry or in unusually poor health, etc.
Very tricky to figure it out, because we DO have the right to our own little idiosyncrasies. If someone is functioning otherwise just fine, who are we to say that collecting those "treasures"
is "wrong"? That's not (usually) "hoarding" or a symbol of other problems.
VERY tricky...
RM
-
- Posts: 12073
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:10 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
My dad keeps saying, when he thinks the stock market will crash/the economy is a shell game/the country is bankrupt, "I don't know, maybe we'll have to spend everything just to eat and leave you nothing."
To which I say, "Good for you!"
To which I say, "Good for you!"
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
[/quote]
you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
[/quote]
Some heirs can be a real piece of work. You would not mind dumping stuff on them. Sad but true.
you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
[/quote]
Some heirs can be a real piece of work. You would not mind dumping stuff on them. Sad but true.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
And ultimate technique to achieve a gold medal in the Passive Aggressive games.rec7 wrote:Some heirs can be a real piece of work. You would not mind dumping stuff on them. Sad but true.you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
The sewer system is a form of welfare state. |
-- "Libra", Don DeLillo
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:47 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I know this sounds like a "story" but its not. This took place many years ago. A neighbor of mine died suddenly at 60. He led not a good life but a great life. His lawyer, another neighbor, showed me his final assets sheet (blocking out his name to keep it legal). He owed everyone. The IRS, mechanic, plumber,restaurants you name it. He paid them off bit by bit so they kept servicing him. The one bill he always paid on time was his life insurance bill. The payoff was twice what he owed. End result was that everyone got paid and he left the remainder and the house (also now paid off) to his daughter. The lawyer laughed as he was telling me. He told me that as he was going to the office on a beautiful spring morning our neighbor would tell him it was too nice to go to work and would play golf instead. Thats why he was laughing. He said that he was the schmuck not our neighbor.
Last edited by reggiesimpson on Wed Nov 13, 2013 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
mathwhiz wrote:What exactly is wrong with dying with $1 in your pocket? Heirs are not owed an inheritance. You are entitled to nothing. If he lived a good life and was happy in his last years with his trinkets, good for him.
-
- Posts: 8421
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
If the life insurance policy had a beneficiary then that person would have no obligation to pay the debts.End result was that everyone got paid and he left the remainder and the house (also now paid off) to his daughter.
Last edited by placeholder on Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
There are ways to keep estates out of probate and stiff creditors legally. It's called having bank accounts that are joint with rights of survivorship or transfer on death. That keeps it out of probate. Family and heirs get the money and creditors like credit cards who usually have no secured debt get nothing or fight over the crumbs. Maxing out credit card limits when you are terminally ill can be free money if planned correctly. Ethical questions nothwithstanding.
- mephistophles
- Posts: 3110
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:34 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
This thread does not show Bogleheads in a very favorable light. Makes me wonder why I contribute here.
ole meph
ole meph
-
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:47 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
This occurred back in the 70s and i simply listened to what his atty said. As i felt privileged to even get this info i wasnt about to question him.placeholder wrote:If the life insurance policy had a beneficiary then that person would have no obligation to pay the debts.End result was that everyone got paid and he left the remainder and the house (also now paid off) to his daughter.
-
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:17 am
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
As long as you're accurate!mathwhiz wrote:What exactly is wrong with dying with $1 in your pocket?
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
I agree.mephistophles wrote:This thread does not show Bogleheads in a very favorable light. Makes me wonder why I contribute here.
ole meph
But the good news is, probably 80% of bogleheads following the 4% SWR rule will croak with at least a year's former income in their accounts.
So it's all just cheering for the outliers...
Attempted new signature...
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
After they insulted your family for 40 years your tolerance can sink to a new low level.roymeo wrote:And ultimate technique to achieve a gold medal in the Passive Aggressive games.rec7 wrote:Some heirs can be a real piece of work. You would not mind dumping stuff on them. Sad but true.you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
It must all be a matter of perspective.
I, for one, hope to leave my family with a little something.
I hope, however, that my parents enjoy every last dollar of their hard earned winnings.
I, for one, hope to leave my family with a little something.
I hope, however, that my parents enjoy every last dollar of their hard earned winnings.
Re: Dying with $1 in Pocket
Just saying, there's probably healthier things to do than passive aggressively stiffing someone. If you care enough to hurt them passively, why not do it right?rec7 wrote:After they insulted your family for 40 years your tolerance can sink to a new low level.roymeo wrote:And ultimate technique to achieve a gold medal in the Passive Aggressive games.rec7 wrote:Some heirs can be a real piece of work. You would not mind dumping stuff on them. Sad but true.you are forgetting the expenses and work you just dumped on your heirs.
The sewer system is a form of welfare state. |
-- "Libra", Don DeLillo