sdrone wrote:It's really too bad there aren't good investment vehicles in this space. I max my tax-avoidance accounts (401k, Roth IRA) and I've got term insurance. I wish there were SOMETHING good in this space to stash more savings in a tax-friendly manner.
jeffyscott wrote:In addition to taking the cash value or converting to a term policy, you may be able to convert it to a paid-up policy.
sdrone wrote:It's really too bad there aren't good investment vehicles in this space. I max my tax-avoidance accounts (401k, Roth IRA) and I've got term insurance. I wish there were SOMETHING good in this space to stash more savings in a tax-friendly manner.
Outer Marker wrote:It may or may not be a good idea depending on how long you've had it, the dividends paid, and whether or not they are guaranteed. I wish I had not gotten into the whole life racquet to begin with. But, 9+ years into the policy, the up-front commissions have been sunk, and the tax-deffered return on my NW Mutual whole life is favorable compared to other safe investments. These policies are the devil to figure out. I paid $79 for an impartial evaluation by this guy before deciding to keep mine. http://www.evaluatelifeinsurance.org If you have pressing need for the cash to pay down high interest debt, that would certainly factor into the decision.
dhodson wrote:your in force illustration will tell you what you could get back. Also if you just call and ask what the cash surrender value is they will tell you that value.
Yes all gains are taxed as income even if you crash the policy. Your example shows one of the many problems of taking out too much in loans too early in life from a policy.
HomerJ wrote:sdrone wrote:It's really too bad there aren't good investment vehicles in this space. I max my tax-avoidance accounts (401k, Roth IRA) and I've got term insurance. I wish there were SOMETHING good in this space to stash more savings in a tax-friendly manner.
A plain old stock index fund in a taxable account is very tax-friendly.
People worry way too much about taxes, and not enough about fees...
$100,000 in the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund costs like $60 a year in fees, and generates about $2000 in dividends, which costs you $300 in taxes... (15%)... That's $360 you lose from that account each year (0.36%).
Life insurance salesman promises you no taxes, but you pay 2%-3% in fees each year.... Many people, scared of taxes, end up paying $2000-$3000 each year to avoid $300 in taxes.
neophyte wrote:jeffyscott wrote:In addition to taking the cash value or converting to a term policy, you may be able to convert it to a paid-up policy.
Would this be a paid-up term life policy?
HomerJ wrote:
A plain old stock index fund in a taxable account is very tax-friendly.
People worry way too much about taxes, and not enough about fees...
neophyte wrote:Outer Marker wrote: I've only had it maybe 4 years. I am not sure about up-front commissions, I went through USAA. I am going to look at that link and determine if I want to just ditch it. It's a very low policy value ($50k) and I'm having many second thoughts about keeping it at this point.
mephistophles wrote:neophyte wrote:Outer Marker wrote: I've only had it maybe 4 years. I am not sure about up-front commissions, I went through USAA. I am going to look at that link and determine if I want to just ditch it. It's a very low policy value ($50k) and I'm having many second thoughts about keeping it at this point.
Just my opinion as a 40 plus year life insurance agent. Recommend you just ditch the four year old policy. Call the company for a cash surrender form. No taxes will be due as you will surrender value will be small compared to premiums paid. Of course, make sure your life insurance needs are filled with term insurance before you do this.
ole meph
Dandy wrote:In most cases whole life is too expensive to maintain if you have other life insurance options. I have a small whole life insurance that is paid up (after 40 yrs). The current dividend divided by the cash value returns 5.85%. So while it probably wasn't worth having this policy vs term for 40 years it does not seem to be worth giving up - especially now that there is no premium.
For those who have had whole life for a long term do the math before you act. For those of you who don't have whole life seriously consider term before you act.
EmergDoc wrote:Dandy wrote:In most cases whole life is too expensive to maintain if you have other life insurance options. I have a small whole life insurance that is paid up (after 40 yrs). The current dividend divided by the cash value returns 5.85%. So while it probably wasn't worth having this policy vs term for 40 years it does not seem to be worth giving up - especially now that there is no premium.
For those who have had whole life for a long term do the math before you act. For those of you who don't have whole life seriously consider term before you act.
Well-stated.
Return to Personal Finance (Not Investing)
Users browsing this forum: Market345, obgraham and 23 guests