gator15 wrote:"A terrible tenant could cost us thousands."
TRC wrote:I don't want to be a negative nelly, but my experience owning a 3 family was awful and I dumped it for a loss after 2 years.
My property looked great on paper too, but things never go as planned. Issues I had: vacancies, non paying tenants, unhappy tenants, boyfriends moving in with tenant that dealt drugs, repairs, issues with snow removal, tenants fighting over parking, leaky roof, tenants verbally accosting me, repairs, fleas, angry neighbors....did I mention repairs? I hated it and it was depressing work.
Fast forward 5 years and we bought a 4BR/3.5BA condo at the beach that we rent out for $3,300 a week in the summer. We break even after renting it for 8 weeks in the summer. It doesn't cash flow, but it's easy work and all high end renters who are on vacation. We get paid in advance and only have each guest for a week. We use it when it's not rented (beginning and end of summer, and all off season).
pc95 wrote:I am entertaining the idea of becoming a landlord. Believe it would make sense financially for the area I'm looking at.
$170k - 1450 sqft house renting for about $1350/month rent, 1.5% property tax. Of course there's much more to being a land-lord
than just financials.
Those of you who have been or are landlords, what is your feelings on being a landlord? Too much work, great experience,
not worth it, great tenants, awful tenants, investing in repairs, draining,too much time, easy etc?
Thanks.
pc95 wrote:
What ways would you not want to make money as a landlord (since you stated)?
rjbraun wrote:TRC wrote:I don't want to be a negative nelly, but my experience owning a 3 family was awful and I dumped it for a loss after 2 years.
My property looked great on paper too, but things never go as planned. Issues I had: vacancies, non paying tenants, unhappy tenants, boyfriends moving in with tenant that dealt drugs, repairs, issues with snow removal, tenants fighting over parking, leaky roof, tenants verbally accosting me, repairs, fleas, angry neighbors....did I mention repairs? I hated it and it was depressing work.
Fast forward 5 years and we bought a 4BR/3.5BA condo at the beach that we rent out for $3,300 a week in the summer. We break even after renting it for 8 weeks in the summer. It doesn't cash flow, but it's easy work and all high end renters who are on vacation. We get paid in advance and only have each guest for a week. We use it when it's not rented (beginning and end of summer, and all off season).
Aren't you basically a landlord in the latter situation as well? Is the difference that your summer place attracts higher-end renters and maybe they are less problematic?
I just find it interesting because in other ways I would think people on vacation, paying a lot of money, etc could be equally demanding since they want everything to be perfect on vacation, etc. Or maybe it's because you live there already off-season and so it's easier to maintain the place.
Just wondering because I too am wary of being a landlord for the reasons you state. But if there's a way to make it work with a vacation home that I'm also going to enjoy that could be interesting
btenny wrote:Vacation renters are the worst case for rental properties
btenny wrote:TRC and others. Vacation renters are the worst case for rental properties IMO. Just because you think they can pay the big weekly rents thus making them more responsible is incorrect. These people are there for a week of FUN. They could care less if they break things or if the faucets leak. Plus they will steal the artwork off the walls or the fireplace tools or anything that is not attached.
For instance I know of two rental properties right in my neighborhood that BURNED down while vacation rented. Yep the renters were careless with candles and the properties burned. Both times the homes were total losses. One also partially burned out the neighbor as well. Or how about renters who left the water running and flooded the whole downstairs. This has happened to two others I know. One in the winter and one in the summer. Or how about someone leaving the patio door open for 2+ weeks during the winter for giant heating bills and ruined carpet. This happened to me when my rental agent did not check the unit adequately after a person checked out. So beware, vacation renters can be big trouble.....
Net net rentals can make you a lot of money but they are work and there are risks. Just be careful and close by so you can check up on the renters and make sure things are going well.
Bill
btenny wrote:TRC and others. Vacation renters are the worst case for rental properties IMO. Just because you think they can pay the big weekly rents thus making them more responsible is incorrect. These people are there for a week of FUN. They could care less if they break things or if the faucets leak. Plus they will steal the artwork off the walls or the fireplace tools or anything that is not attached.
For instance I know of two rental properties right in my neighborhood that BURNED down while vacation rented. Yep the renters were careless with candles and the properties burned. Both times the homes were total losses. One also partially burned out the neighbor as well. Or how about renters who left the water running and flooded the whole downstairs. This has happened to two others I know. One in the winter and one in the summer. Or how about someone leaving the patio door open for 2+ weeks during the winter for giant heating bills and ruined carpet. This happened to me when my rental agent did not check the unit adequately after a person checked out. So beware, vacation renters can be big trouble.....
Net net rentals can make you a lot of money but they are work and there are risks. Just be careful and close by so you can check up on the renters and make sure things are going well.
Bill
travellight wrote:"I have stopped doing credit reports on my tenants. I'm sure this is a controversial move but I go with a high security deposit as my trump card. I have nice properties so I tend to get high market rents for the area and almost all are SFRs in nice areas. I used to do first and last month's rent plus $500 security deposit. Now, I just do first month's rent and one full month's rent as security deposit. I have found that no one wants to risk that much money and they want that full month's value of security deposit back so the property has been left in good condition."
newbogleb wrote:Anyone have experience with duplexes versus single family houses?
leonard wrote:Would you take $170k in cash - and leave it with a stranger to look after while you are not there?
Precisely what you are doing with your $170k asset.
TRC wrote:btenny wrote:TRC and others. Vacation renters are the worst case for rental properties IMO. Just because you think they can pay the big weekly rents thus making them more responsible is incorrect. These people are there for a week of FUN. They could care less if they break things or if the faucets leak. Plus they will steal the artwork off the walls or the fireplace tools or anything that is not attached.
For instance I know of two rental properties right in my neighborhood that BURNED down while vacation rented. Yep the renters were careless with candles and the properties burned. Both times the homes were total losses. One also partially burned out the neighbor as well. Or how about renters who left the water running and flooded the whole downstairs. This has happened to two others I know. One in the winter and one in the summer. Or how about someone leaving the patio door open for 2+ weeks during the winter for giant heating bills and ruined carpet. This happened to me when my rental agent did not check the unit adequately after a person checked out. So beware, vacation renters can be big trouble.....
Net net rentals can make you a lot of money but they are work and there are risks. Just be careful and close by so you can check up on the renters and make sure things are going well.
Bill
Bill - candles and flooding can happen to any rental property (vacation rentals or short term).
Winter rentals aren't short term vacation rentals. I don't bother with them...they're typically not good clients and are more trouble than they're worth.
I'm relating my experience that since I've owned both long rental properties and short term rentals. I believe high end short term vacation rentals are less head aches and lower risk compared to long term renters. Why?
- You get all the rent in advance before you send them a key.
- High end rentals screen out the riff-raff. After it's all said & done, I collect more than $4k per a week (rent, tax, cleaning fee), PLUS a $600 security deposit. In my two summers of doing this, I have not had a single issue. Most of the time my cleaner tells me the renters leave the place cleaner than they found it. All of the renters I've had are upper middle class folks - usually grand parents, parents, and kids vacationing together. I personally screen all my tenants to make sure I know how many, what ages, etc.
- People want their $600 back. I have a thorough punch list they have to go through to get it. All of them do it.
- You don't have to deal with evictions and all the other types of headaches that come with long term renters.
- When people are on vacation, they're happy! Most of my renters spend their time at the beach, down town, or out at restaurants. Not in our condo looking for things to nit pick.
Also, we're very anal about keeping our property clean and extremely well equipped. For 2013 summer, 5 of the 8 weeks are already rebooked with repeat renters that I know are awesome and love the place. Our neighbors have been renting for 6 summers and they've only had 1 "bad" renter (where they just left the place slightly messy) in her entire time renting. She also has a solid line of repeat renters that she knows personally. It comes down to location, quality of the property, and how well you screen the tenants. And by the way, I've yet to turn anyone away. Maybe I'm just lucky, or maybe the price just filters out the disrespectful renters.
Now, if you're talking about low end summer rentals that attract college kids and lower income folks, I could totally see the risk of damage and vandalasm.
It sounds like you made the mistake of using a rental agent. Remember, no one will care as much about your property as you. From what I've seen, rental agents care most about slamming any renter in there they can so they can take their 15-20% of the cut.
Nathan Drake wrote:Yeah what Honobob said is absolutely correct.
You can generally expect about 10+% (conservative) appreciation on housing, plus 10+% annual rent increases every single year reliably with no troubles. People from my high school did it all the time.

Nathan Drake wrote:Yeah what Honobob said is absolutely correct.
You can generally expect about 10+% (conservative) appreciation on housing, plus 10+% annual rent increases every single year reliably with no troubles. People from my high school did it all the time.
master36 wrote:TRC, care to share your punch card that you have tenants review before leaving your property?
Calm Man wrote:For simplicity and to save many hours of time and many possible hours of grief, if you are interested in real estate why not buy a REIT index fund? Those professionals who manage REITs likely can manage properties as well as or better than you can and let them lose the sleep.
fmhealth wrote:Why not just buy some REITS? Many pay 7% or greater on a monthly basis. Not satisfied, a simple click of your mouse & a $6.00 comission will instantaneously vaporize any deal that you're uncomfortable with. No tenants, complaints, vacancies or slow-pays.
If you are interested, may I humbly offer up a suggestion. Take a look @ WSR. They're buying-up top quality properties here in Scottsdale for 50-60% of replacement value. Pay monthly & stock price has improved nicely. It's around $14.00. I think it's a bit overpriced now but at around $13.00 I'll be increasing my position.
Be Well,
fmhealth
Valuethinker wrote:
Mathematically that is almost impossible.
Yes US housing prices are down c. 40%. And housing starts hitting 1991 lows. So a 'pop' in housing prices of 10-20% is quite possible.
But think after that:
- people either buy houses with incomes (which are rising maybe 2-3% pa at the moment)
- OR they buy them with increased mortgages -- do you think Americans will be able to leverage up to that extent, as they have done in the past?
Similarly rent is paid by incomes. And nominal incomes (not real) are rising maybe 2-3% pa right now, and might rise to say 4-5% pa in a recovery.
That gap would have to be made up by cutting other types of consumption (and your average renter does not have that kind of slack on food, gas etc. to cut forever).
Best guess is US housing prices rise 5-10% pa from here and rents perhaps 5% pa-- however there is the possibility, noted above, of a 'pop' if the economy finally gets into full recovery mode. Of course there will be exceptions-- but both ways. I remember graphs showing me that, adjusted for inflation, housing prices in Buffalo had not risen for over 30 years. Then there's Detroit.

travellight wrote:TRC- That is an amazing list of expectations. I haven't dared to do that when I did vacation rentals. Do you make sure they know this before they decide to rent your place? I would be afraid to lose most of my business.
Return to Personal Finance (Not Investing)
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], oaksavannah and 63 guests