gsgarcia1 wrote:Thank you all for the replies thus far. Mel, thanks for bringing Rick into the thread, and Semper Fi: It was encouraging to read. That is exactly the type of path I would see myself going down. I know there may be necessary hurdles on the front end as Rick mentioned, but I welcome the challenges for the greater good.
Anyone that has any thoughts, please keep the thread going as I am eager to learn all I can in any forum in order to make the most informed decisions
Gabe
Beat The Street wrote:A bank is a great place to start in my opinion, if you can find a local bank with a brokerage.
Calm Man wrote:My 2 cents. You can work for a large or small brokerage and unfortunately the only way you can make money is either via assets under management, fees on selling products or a combination of both. Almost by default anything you sell will have a profit motive in one way or another as you have to be paid, as does the supervisor, other employees and shareholders. It is admirable to want to help the middle class. If by that you mean people with 100 or 200K in assets, you will not be able to reasonably handle those accounts as there is no money to be made. If you really want to do this, you probably need to bite the bullet as Rick suggests and gain the needed experience. Good luck.
SNR wrote:Calm Man wrote:My 2 cents. You can work for a large or small brokerage and unfortunately the only way you can make money is either via assets under management, fees on selling products or a combination of both. Almost by default anything you sell will have a profit motive in one way or another as you have to be paid, as does the supervisor, other employees and shareholders. It is admirable to want to help the middle class. If by that you mean people with 100 or 200K in assets, you will not be able to reasonably handle those accounts as there is no money to be made. If you really want to do this, you probably need to bite the bullet as Rick suggests and gain the needed experience. Good luck.
I don't understand why you believe assets under management or fees is the only way to make money as a financial advisor. Why can't one have a business where he charges an hourly rate for objective financial advise to middle income clients?
thanks
Beat The Street wrote:SNR wrote:Calm Man wrote:My 2 cents. You can work for a large or small brokerage and unfortunately the only way you can make money is either via assets under management, fees on selling products or a combination of both. Almost by default anything you sell will have a profit motive in one way or another as you have to be paid, as does the supervisor, other employees and shareholders. It is admirable to want to help the middle class. If by that you mean people with 100 or 200K in assets, you will not be able to reasonably handle those accounts as there is no money to be made. If you really want to do this, you probably need to bite the bullet as Rick suggests and gain the needed experience. Good luck.
I don't understand why you believe assets under management or fees is the only way to make money as a financial advisor. Why can't one have a business where he charges an hourly rate for objective financial advise to middle income clients?
thanks
You would have to do much higher volume if you charged hourly, and just because you hang out your shingle doesn't mean people start lining up for your services.
Return to Personal Finance (Not Investing)
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], MossySF and 13 guests