hsv_climber wrote:Read the livesoft manual 8)
There is no such generic thing as "worst day". "Worst day" applies to a specific ETF. Are you asking about a specific ETF?
livesoft wrote:Close, but not yet.
mas wrote:Too bad. Today would have made a good "day after the worst" day.
Taylor Larimore wrote: Those who stayed-the-course were well rewarded.
Taylor Larimore wrote:Hi Diehards:
The 10 Worst Days for the Dow (1950 to March 2009)
10-19-87....-22.6%
10-26-87......-8.0%
10-15-08......-7.9%
12-01-08......-7.7%
10-09-08......-7.3%
10-27-97......-7.2%
09-17-01......-7.1%
09-29-08......-7.0%
10-13-89......-6.9%
01-08-88......-6.9%
(Source: Stock Trader's Almanac)
In January 1950 the Dow was 202. Today the Dow is 11,181 (not counting dividends).
Those who stayed-the-course were well rewarded.
livesoft wrote:Mr Larimore, did you rebalance on 10-19-87? Surely, one's asset allocation was out-of-whack by the end of that day. Stay-the-course means "buy and rebalance" nowadays, doesn't it?
livesoft wrote:Mr Larimore, did you rebalance on 10-19-87? Surely, one's asset allocation was out-of-whack by the end of that day. Stay-the-course means "buy and rebalance" nowadays, doesn't it?
hsv_climber wrote:Taylor Larimore wrote: Those who stayed-the-course were well rewarded.
But would not those who bought Dow (S&P) - tracking mutual funds on these worst days got rewarded even more?
jpsfranks wrote:Not necessarily. Being able to invest in stocks on "worst days" implies having assets with lower expected returns at other times.
Taylor Larimore wrote:livesoft wrote:Mr Larimore, did you rebalance on 10-19-87? Surely, one's asset allocation was out-of-whack by the end of that day. Stay-the-course means "buy and rebalance" nowadays, doesn't it?
Hi livesoft:
All I remember is that I was scared -- until I remembered stock market history (the Dow plunged -52.7% in 1931) and Mr. Bogle's sage advice:
"Stay-the-course."
hsv_climber wrote:jpsfranks wrote:Not necessarily. Being able to invest in stocks on "worst days" implies having assets with lower expected returns at other times.
Are you 100% invested in stocks? Because if not then it implies that you have assets with lower expected returns @ other times.
am wrote:I rebalanced into Wellington in 1932 and have been rewarded handsomely.
livesoft wrote:I've been doing some "studies". I am not going to call this a "worst day" strategy anymore because folks get totally confused. Instead, I am going to call this the "really bad day" strategy.
The last 3 really bad days for FSIIX (large cap foreign developed) were
2010-08-11: -4.04%
2010-06-04: -3.56%
2010-06-29: -3.28%
and for EFA the last 4 bad days occurred on
2010-08-11: -4.55%
2010-06-04: -4.28%
2010-06-29: -3.42%
2010-07-16: -3.20%
So we would need a drop of at least 3.3% in VEA or EFA for today to qualify as a "really bad day".
neverknow wrote:There is no law of the universe that requires you to participate in this nonsense (if it doesn't suit you). And it doesn't suit me. Back in 1987 it was forever into the future that retirement was, and now -- not far enough. Laddered CD's (4 tier 2 year ladder is my choice) goes on adding compounded interest, boring year after boring year. (I do have some in the market, for diversification)
GammaPoint wrote:Can we get a "Livesoft Really Bad Day" app? I could put it on my Touch.
livesoft wrote:Is a calander a cross between a calendar and a colander? I guess that's a calendar with holes in it where the reallly bad days would normally be?
Morgan wrote:noobvester wrote:How about a Boglehead app along the lines of the 'Don't Panic' sticker on the front of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - the all app would do is highlight one of three words (maybe stacked like a stoplight?):
Buy
Hold
Rebalance
Yes! And a hypnotic track playing in the background repeating those words.
I LOL, but some people really do try to sell stuff in the vein of 'the Boglehead experience -- guaranteed to make you a millionaire or your money back'.
Keep the ideas flowing 8)

xram wrote:How do apply a RBD calculation to a mutual fund? Just run the numbers for the corresponding ETF?
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General
Users browsing this forum: ergophobic, Exabot [Bot], gkaplan, Munir and 23 guests