Mutual fund or ETF?
Mutual fund or ETF?
With Vanguard now offering commission-free ETFs, would it be a good idea to buy ETFs rather than mutual funds if it's in a Roth IRA?
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 12:32 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
- Contact:
Callalily,
I suggest that you check out the Wiki Page on ETFs. There are several good articles and resources under the "ETF vs. Mutual Funds" heading.
Yesterday's announcement from Vanguard certainly changes the cost equation for many index investors, but switching to ETFs isn't a no-brainer for everyone, as there are many factors involved.
-George
I suggest that you check out the Wiki Page on ETFs. There are several good articles and resources under the "ETF vs. Mutual Funds" heading.
Yesterday's announcement from Vanguard certainly changes the cost equation for many index investors, but switching to ETFs isn't a no-brainer for everyone, as there are many factors involved.
-George
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Re: Mutual fund or ETF?
No other financial decision you make this year will be less important.Callalily wrote:With Vanguard now offering commission-free ETFs, would it be a good idea to buy ETFs rather than mutual funds if it's in a Roth IRA?
It's less important than telling the cashier whether to run your ATM card as credit or debit.
Shorter ticker symbols would be a good enough reason to switch to ETFs. Already knowing the five-letter mutual fund symbols would be a good enough reason to stick with mutual funds.
You can save more money by switching from Starbucks to Dunkin' Donuts than by switching from VTSMX to VTI. (Don't trust me on that, do your own math using your own account size, your own coffee-drinking habits, and your own thirty-year forecasts of stock market returns and coffee cost).
If you already know you prefer ETFs for whatever reason, Vanguard has done a nice little thing. As a newsworthy business move, it's right up there with Buick announcing its 2011 paint colors. Pretty interesting--to Vanguard or Buick fans, respectively.
(I prefer mutual funds for completely silly reasons. I could change my mind tomorrow. And change it back the day after. 1) I'm used to them. 2) I like being able to buy or sell arbitrary dollar amounts to the penny (ETFs need to be bought or sold in whole numbers of shares). 3) I like being able to set up automatic monthly withdrawals, purchases and exchanges, not possible with ETFs. 4) The idea that it matters if I place the order at 11 a.m. rather than 10 a.m. weirds me out. 5) The idea that the market price could even be slightly different from the NAV weirds me out. 6) The idea that when I want my dough I have to find someone who wants to buy my shares, rather than selling "to" a fund manager who keeps cash around for just that purpose, weirds me out. Reasons 4, 5, and 6 are especially silly, by the way, just handy rationalizations for what I want to do anyway.)
Last edited by nisiprius on Wed May 05, 2010 9:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
Re: Mutual fund or ETF?
I don't think #5 and 6 are silly at all.nisiprius wrote:5) The idea that the market price could even be slightly different from the NAV weirds me out. 6) The idea that when I want my dough I have to find someone who wants to buy my shares, rather than selling "to" a fund manager who keeps cash around for just that purpose, weirds me out. Reasons 4, 5, and 6 are especially silly, by the way, just handy rationalizations for what I want to do anyway.)
ETFs are viewed as nearly identical to mutual funds because the bid/ask spreads are low. That's all well and good, but there is no guarantee that the spreads will always be low, or, more importantly, that the spreads will be low when I need to buy and sell. ETF investors are thus doubly subjected to market forces, first at the NAV level (the value of the underlying securities), and again at the ETF level.
I understand that that authorized participants act as arbitrageurs (is there a cooler word in the English language?) and thus far have helped keep the spreads low, at least on the more popular ETFs. But ETFs as an investment vehicle have only been around since 1993, so I'd like to see a slightly longer track record before I jump in with both feet.
My $0.02.
-
- Posts: 3314
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:17 am
I don't pretend to understand all of the distinctions, but I seem to recall Vanguard having a little summary of "whether an ETF is right for you," which compared ETFs to its Index funds.
The big difference (and the determinative factor) to me is that ETFs were not advantageous for those who like to dollar cost average or do regular periodic investments (whatever your term of choice may be). As I do like to do such things, I'll stick with the index funds.
Plus, as nisiprius notes, the fact that the price of the ETF changes throughout the day is something that I can't handle. I prefer to just put my money in every few days and be isolated from the hourly gyrations of the market. It is much easier for me to handle that way.
The big difference (and the determinative factor) to me is that ETFs were not advantageous for those who like to dollar cost average or do regular periodic investments (whatever your term of choice may be). As I do like to do such things, I'll stick with the index funds.
Plus, as nisiprius notes, the fact that the price of the ETF changes throughout the day is something that I can't handle. I prefer to just put my money in every few days and be isolated from the hourly gyrations of the market. It is much easier for me to handle that way.
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:12 pm
All Vanguard Mutual Fund symbols are of the form ****X, where each * is replaced with a letter (at least the Investor shares are; and I think the Admiral shares are. I'm not sure about Signal and Institutional Shares).Doc wrote:What "X"?livesoft wrote:^nisiprius's words should be at the preface of the wiki page on ETFs.
But they also suggest that as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
You could say all Vanguard Mutual Fund Symbols are of the form V***X, where each * is replaced with a letter; with the exception of the Small-cap Index fund (NAESX). So, with Vanguard Mutual Funds you only have to memorize 3-letters, plus V and X; and the exception to the rule (NAESX).
Also, some of Vangaurds ETFs are 4-letters now (like VGSH, VMBS, VCSH, VCIT and VGIT). Some of the ETFs are only 2-letters (like VV, VO, VB and VT). So, the memorization rules for ETFs are not so simple.
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
The "X" at the end of every mutual fund ticker symbol, e.g. VFSUX, MRFIX, INSEX, NOBOX, NOFIX, NOMIX, NOTAX, RELAX, etc.Doc wrote:What "X"?livesoft wrote:as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
Last edited by nisiprius on Wed May 05, 2010 10:48 am, edited 2 times in total.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
-
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
Just to be clear for those who might be reading, you can certainly dollar cost average into ETFs. At Vanguard now you would get free trades into Vanguard ETFs so you could dollar cost average freely, and of course WellsTrade gives you 100 free trades/year, so again you could easily DCA even every week if you wanted to.Random Poster wrote: The big difference (and the determinative factor) to me is that ETFs were not advantageous for those who like to dollar cost average or do regular periodic investments (whatever your term of choice may be). As I do like to do such things, I'll stick with the index funds.
I currently DCA into ETFs with purchase prices often below $100 (1-2 shares).
-
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
Okay yeah, that's true. If you really want to put in exactly $100 each month and the price of the ETF fluctuates between $60-$100, you're not going to be buying more shares when the price is lower because you'll always be buying 1.livesoft wrote:^To be fair, I do not believe that you can set up an automatic investment of $100/$250/$500 a week/month/whatever because you cannot usually purchase fractional shares in an ETF via this method. In this sense, a straight-up mutual fund is more automated.
And for many people, the fact that the transaction happens automatically and they don't have to log on and make an order might be all the difference.
Ah, Live Free or Diehard and nisiprius,Doc wrote:What "X"?livesoft wrote:^nisiprius's words should be at the preface of the wiki page on ETFs.
But they also suggest that as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
Regards,
Old Doc
Perhaps you guys missed my sign off in the prior post:
Old Doc :lol:
A scientist looks for THE answer to a problem, an engineer looks for AN answer and lawyers ONLY have opinions. Investing is not a science.
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
I think ETF shares are attractive for those interested in mutual funds that may charge purchase and redemption fees such as Emerging Markets (VEIEX), FTSE All World ex-US small cap (VFSVX). For these funds, you'd save not only the difference in expense ratio but also the 0.25-0.75% purchase fees and redemption fees.
Emerging Markets VEIEX has er=0.40%, purchase fee=0.50%, redemption fee=0.25%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
FTSE All World ex-US small cap VFSVX has er=0.63%, purchase fee=0.75%, redemption fee=0.75%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
ETF shares held at a brokerage will typically offer support for specific share identification to give maximum control of capital gains. This could be a big advantage for those with investments in taxable accounts.
Emerging Markets VEIEX has er=0.40%, purchase fee=0.50%, redemption fee=0.25%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
FTSE All World ex-US small cap VFSVX has er=0.63%, purchase fee=0.75%, redemption fee=0.75%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
ETF shares held at a brokerage will typically offer support for specific share identification to give maximum control of capital gains. This could be a big advantage for those with investments in taxable accounts.
-
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:31 pm
This thread has brightened my day. Thanks, nisiprius for some inspired silliness.nisiprius wrote:The "X" at the end of every mutual fund ticker symbol, e.g. VFSUX, MRFIX, INSEX, NOBOX, NOFIX, NOMIX, NOTAX, RELAX, etc.Doc wrote:What "X"?livesoft wrote:as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
And someone mentioned NAESX. What's up with that? Does anyone else think it's adopted?
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
Barry has the answer here:RobertAlanK wrote:And someone mentioned NAESX. What's up with that? Does anyone else think it's adopted?
http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=447384
- nisiprius
- Advisory Board
- Posts: 52105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:33 am
- Location: The terrestrial, globular, planetary hunk of matter, flattened at the poles, is my abode.--O. Henry
Actually I called Vanguard to check. No fractional shares. And, as I thought, no automatic investment of any kind, whether it be purchases, sales, or exchanges. And they say also note that in their presentation Are ETFs Right for You?livesoft wrote:^To be fair, I do not believe that you can set up an automatic investment of $100/$250/$500 a week/month/whatever because you cannot usually purchase fractional shares in an ETF via this method. In this sense, a straight-up mutual fund is more automated.
And it's not just an issue of transacting whole numbers of shares, because that's one of the four possible options for automatic mutual fund transactions.
If you can automatically purchase 10 shares of VTSMX a month, why can't you automatically purchase 10 shares of VTI a month? I think it just confirms my impression of whose uses what. Mutual fund customers are long-term savers, ETF customers are short-term traders.
You'd better explain, O Venerable One. Was there a time, known in the lore of the ancients, when it was otherwise? And when did the X appear? Oh, please please tell me it was in the year MCMLX!Doc wrote:Ah, Live Free or Diehard and nisiprius, Perhaps you guys missed my sign off in the prior post: Old Doc :lol:Doc wrote:What "X"? Regards, Old Doclivesoft wrote:But they also suggest that as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness; Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.
- Opponent Process
- Posts: 5157
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:19 pm
-
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:12 pm
Also, Tax-managed International VTMGX has er=.20%, redemption fee=1% if held less than 5 yrsDSInvestor wrote:I think ETF shares are attractive for those interested in mutual funds that may charge purchase and redemption fees such as Emerging Markets (VEIEX), FTSE All World ex-US small cap (VFSVX). For these funds, you'd save not only the difference in expense ratio but also the 0.25-0.75% purchase fees and redemption fees.
Emerging Markets VEIEX has er=0.40%, purchase fee=0.50%, redemption fee=0.25%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
FTSE All World ex-US small cap VFSVX has er=0.63%, purchase fee=0.75%, redemption fee=0.75%
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
ETF shares held at a brokerage will typically offer support for specific share identification to give maximum control of capital gains. This could be a big advantage for those with investments in taxable accounts.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... IntExt=INT
If you buy the ETF version (VEA) you can get around the 5 yr holding period and lower your er to .15%.
Re: Mutual fund or ETF?
I already minimize coffee cost by drinking at home and hedge my coffee risk with the ETF JO http://www.google.com/finance?q=JOnisiprius wrote:
You can save more money by switching from Starbucks to Dunkin' Donuts than by switching from VTSMX to VTI. (Don't trust me on that, do your own math using your own account size, your own coffee-drinking habits, and your own thirty-year forecasts of stock market returns and coffee cost).
So does that mean I get a free 11 bps/yr?
You can however get fractional shares if you convert. For those who like periodic investments, they could always accumulate in mutual fund share classes and convert when it gets to be a larger lump. The downside is entering in the costs basis for each lot.nisiprius wrote:Actually I called Vanguard to check. No fractional shares. [/url]livesoft wrote:^To be fair, I do not believe that you can set up an automatic investment of $100/$250/$500 a week/month/whatever because you cannot usually purchase fractional shares in an ETF via this method. In this sense, a straight-up mutual fund is more automated.
I have been pondering this question myself as I am contemplating moving my ROTH IRA to Vanguard. My situation is as follows, I intend to DCA and deposit $100.00 bi-weekly into my ROTH IRA, and I am planning to allocate my money among five or six categories. My ROTH IRA has a balance of approximately $35,000.00. I also have a TSP with approximately $27,000.00 with the following allocation: 40% C Fund, 24% I Fund, 16% S Fund, 10% F Fund, and 10% G Fund. I intend on using similar funds and allocations for simplicity purpose. My questions are as follows:
1. If I go with Mutual Funds, do I have to choose only one fund for that $100.00 deposit to go to and then do a fund transfer as that one grows out of proportion? Or change with frequency which fund the money is going into to rebalance with new deposits? Or can I split the $100.00 deposit into percentages going into all the different mutual funds? (like in a TSP account)
2. If I choose ETF's, do I have the deposits go into a cash account, and then make the purchases monthly or quarterly and choose which ETF to buy to rebalance based on my desired asset allocation?
I would prefer the "TSP" option for simplicity, but if I understand correctly, it cannot be done, as each fund requires a minimum $100 deposit.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks
HMB
1. If I go with Mutual Funds, do I have to choose only one fund for that $100.00 deposit to go to and then do a fund transfer as that one grows out of proportion? Or change with frequency which fund the money is going into to rebalance with new deposits? Or can I split the $100.00 deposit into percentages going into all the different mutual funds? (like in a TSP account)
2. If I choose ETF's, do I have the deposits go into a cash account, and then make the purchases monthly or quarterly and choose which ETF to buy to rebalance based on my desired asset allocation?
I would prefer the "TSP" option for simplicity, but if I understand correctly, it cannot be done, as each fund requires a minimum $100 deposit.
Any ideas or suggestions?
Thanks
HMB
Last edited by burnsh on Wed May 05, 2010 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
burnsh, I used to make all my SEP-IRA contributions into a money market fund and then use exchanges from MMF into other funds within the SEP-IRA. The exchanges can be done manually or they can be automated. I suppose you could use a similar strategy with your Roth IRA account.
How big is your Roth IRA account? Keep in mind that Vanguard has a 3K minimum for most mutual funds. Do you need to hold 6 holdings in the Roth? If you have a TSP at work, you could use to the Roth IRA to hold things that may not be available in TSP. You should consider all your accounts as a unified portfolio.
If you're willing to post a little more information about your current portfolio, you may get some better suggestions:
http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6212
How big is your Roth IRA account? Keep in mind that Vanguard has a 3K minimum for most mutual funds. Do you need to hold 6 holdings in the Roth? If you have a TSP at work, you could use to the Roth IRA to hold things that may not be available in TSP. You should consider all your accounts as a unified portfolio.
If you're willing to post a little more information about your current portfolio, you may get some better suggestions:
http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6212
-
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
-
- Posts: 11647
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:42 am
Yes, you will receive fractional shares for reinvested dividends. This is true for ETFs and for individual stocks. Check with your brokerage firm to make sure they support dividend reinvestment of your ETF shares.GammaPoint wrote:nisiprius wrote:Actually I called Vanguard to check. No fractional shares.
But you do get fractional shares if you do automatic reinvestment correct?
This isn't a problem if assets are in a tax-deferred account however, so no downside there. I plan to utilize this strategy for my ROTH IRA assets.tarnation wrote:You can however get fractional shares if you convert. For those who like periodic investments, they could always accumulate in mutual fund share classes and convert when it gets to be a larger lump. The downside is entering in the costs basis for each lot.nisiprius wrote:Actually I called Vanguard to check. No fractional shares. [/url]livesoft wrote:^To be fair, I do not believe that you can set up an automatic investment of $100/$250/$500 a week/month/whatever because you cannot usually purchase fractional shares in an ETF via this method. In this sense, a straight-up mutual fund is more automated.
I called Vanguard and got the answer I wanted. Even though additional investments of mutual funds require a $100.00 deposit, if you sign up for the automatic investment plan you can contribute as little as $1.00 per deposit, making it a lot easir to allocate different small amounts through different funds. Mutual Funds win!
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 10:42 pm
Newbie
So without the commission fee, what would the advantage be of an open end index mutual fund vs the ETF? The expenses are lower in the ETF, what am I missing? I'm a newbie investor, sure I'm missing something.
-
- Posts: 2661
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 10:25 am
- Location: Washington
Re: Newbie
Check out what others have posted in this thread before you to see what some opinions are.lostyankee wrote:So without the commission fee, what would the advantage be of an open end index mutual fund vs the ETF? The expenses are lower in the ETF, what am I missing? I'm a newbie investor, sure I'm missing something.
Ok Nisiprius, by the numbers, but it loses a lot that way.nisiprius wrote:You'd better explain, O Venerable One. Was there a time, known in the lore of the ancients, when it was otherwise? And when did the X appear? Oh, please please tell me it was in the year MCMLX!Doc wrote:Ah, Live Free or Diehard and nisiprius, Perhaps you guys missed my sign off in the prior post: Old Doc :lol:Doc wrote:What "X"? Regards, Old Doclivesoft wrote:But they also suggest that as we age, we should prefer ETFs because 3-letters is easier to remember than 4-letters plus an X.
1) "as we age"
2) "3-letters is easier to remember"
3) "what "X"?"
4) "Old Doc"
Conclusion easily reached by persons not looking for deep financial wisdom all the time (or even Roman lore): Doc is too old to even remember the "X".
Oh, I get it "nisi prius". Latin. You are involved in dead languages. Unless you were a trial attorney in a prior life.
A scientist looks for THE answer to a problem, an engineer looks for AN answer and lawyers ONLY have opinions. Investing is not a science.