Which one? When? Where? And why should we believe in that person's credibility?stemikger wrote:...
I may be way off, but it seems bonds are becoming more riskier then they used to be and I believe that is a problem when rebalancing into them. Many experts I trust have been very vocal on how bonds are turning into a very risky investment. One of them said it's like bending down before a steamroller to pick up a nickel.
I can use vivid similes to support any position you'd like. Most of the time I don't even have to make them up. I can copy from others. Just like your "one of them" did. For example: Chopping down trees is like murdering nearly all of one's community, because of what happened on Easter Island. And planting trees is like helping to perfect the world. If you're planting a tree and you hear [ Moshiach | the Buddha ] has come, first finish planting, then go to greet him (or her).
Duration says as long as your bond choices are reasonable for your situation they are not risky.
"I'm in for the duration" said the prisoner of war.
"As long as I'm assigned here rather than the front, I'm indifferent to your situation" said the military guard.
See how easy it is?
PJW