The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Many years ago, when I was young and stupid (as opposed to being old and stupid now), I started teachin' at a university. The U put a certain amount (don't remember what it was) into TIAA fixed and/or CREF stock. I think those were the only choices back then. Not knowing what to do, I followed somebody's advice to just divide my contributions 50/50 between the two choices. Later on, when CREF began offering index funds, I might have redirected the stock contributions to the Equity Index fund instead of CREF stock (which was actively managed). However, I strayed from the academic fold never to return. Recently, I found myself wondering how things would have turned out if I'd continued to work in academe and followed this 50/50 formula (never rebalancing) for the 35 years of so of my working career. If anybody has a handle on this, I'd be interested to hear. I suspect things would have turned out pretty nicely if I'd followed this laziest of laziest portfolio allocations and never bothered to look at my statements until the day I retired. Maybe we just overanalyze things, eh?
We don't know where we are, or where we're going -- but we're making good time.
- cheese_breath
- Posts: 11786
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 7:08 pm
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
A lot would depend on when you contributed and retired. I contributed 25% TIAA, 75% CREF Stock from 1968-1976, left the U in '76 and never looked back until I retired in '97. I was waaay overweight in stocks. But if I had waited a few more years to retire it would have been a different picture indeed.
The surest way to know the future is when it becomes the past.
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:27 pm
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
It turned out quite nicely for many who simply allocated their funds between CREF Stock and Traditional over their academic careers. Most simply looked over their statements mailed to them each quarter (which contained a projected retirement income), may have made a couple of adjustments in the allocation between the two investment options as they approached retirement, and at some time went to a seminar or two to help in the selection of a (then required) retirement annuity. It was an excellent pension plan.Browser wrote:Recently, I found myself wondering how things would have turned out if I'd continued to work in academe and followed this 50/50 formula (never rebalancing) for the 35 years of so of my working career. If anybody has a handle on this, I'd be interested to hear. I suspect things would have turned out pretty nicely if I'd followed this laziest of laziest portfolio allocations and never bothered to look at my statements until the day I retired. Maybe we just overanalyze things, eh?
However, under pressure from some academics to "search for the perfect plan", TIAA was forced to abandon KISS, and now .......
Dick
-
- Posts: 49027
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
As I recall there were hearings in Congress about the tax status of TIAA CREF. The outcome was it became more of a conventional fund manager.DickBenson wrote: However, under pressure from some academics to "search for the perfect plan", TIAA was forced to abandon KISS, and now .......
Dick
I am sure the M* TIAA Forum would have the picture, but I don't think it was 'pressure from academics to search for the perfect plan'-- at least not wholly.
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Browser,
After graduating from med school in 1970, my dad became a research endocrinologist at a mid-atlantic hospital, and also an [associate or assistant] professor at the adjoining/connecting university until he semi retired in 2012. He was 50/50 CREF Stock/TIAA until 2004, when, after losing a lot in 2000-2002, he went 20/80 CREF Stock/TIAA. After 42 years, I think he has somewhere around $2.1 or $2.2 million.
From what I remember, he didn't make all that much for a doctor until the later 1990s/early 2000s. I also don't know how much he contributed along the way, but I imagine after 3 kids got out of college ~ 2000, he maxed it out until 2012.
That help any?
Oops forgot to mention, that there were a couple years of fellowship and residency, so he probably didn't really contribute until around the late 70's.
After graduating from med school in 1970, my dad became a research endocrinologist at a mid-atlantic hospital, and also an [associate or assistant] professor at the adjoining/connecting university until he semi retired in 2012. He was 50/50 CREF Stock/TIAA until 2004, when, after losing a lot in 2000-2002, he went 20/80 CREF Stock/TIAA. After 42 years, I think he has somewhere around $2.1 or $2.2 million.
From what I remember, he didn't make all that much for a doctor until the later 1990s/early 2000s. I also don't know how much he contributed along the way, but I imagine after 3 kids got out of college ~ 2000, he maxed it out until 2012.
That help any?
Oops forgot to mention, that there were a couple years of fellowship and residency, so he probably didn't really contribute until around the late 70's.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" - Upton Sinclair
-
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:46 am
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Since its an academic discussion, it doesn't matter to much, but the historical returns aren't hard to come by. A 50/50 portfolio from, say the 60s would have ended up with close to 10% annualized returns. The problem is that if you never looked at it, it would have turned to 80/20 by the dotcom crash, and you'd have seen a full downturn in 08
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Not quite the 60's, but in I had job from 1975-1980 that contributed a bit less than $2200 to a 50/50 TIAA-CREF account (I contributed nothing - stupid 20 something...)MN Finance wrote:Since its an academic discussion, it doesn't matter to much, but the historical returns aren't hard to come by. A 50/50 portfolio from, say the 60s would have ended up with close to 10% annualized returns. The problem is that if you never looked at it, it would have turned to 80/20 by the dotcom crash, and you'd have seen a full downturn in 08
I have done nothing with it since other than look at the annual statements and think that it will provide a nice dinner a couple of times a month when I retired. It is now 75/25 and a balance of $55K - looks like a return of about 10%. It was 29K at the end of March 2009.
I now wish I had contributed to it.
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Valuethinker is referring to the 1997 surprise attack on TIAA-CREF's tax status by Bill Archer the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Archer was generously supported by his home-town Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC), which wanted to compete more effectively with TIAA-CREF. So Archer, the great foe of taxes, raised TIAA-CREF's taxes.
TIAA-CREF responded by adding a mutual fund business. The loss of focus on their original annuity and insurance business seems to have been a result of both the Archer taxation and pressures from participants wanting more options, as Dick said. This was during the tech bull market, and some thought that TIAA-CREF had become stodgy. Whatever the causes, the change was unfortunate. There's a lot to be said for stodgy and KISS.
John
TIAA-CREF responded by adding a mutual fund business. The loss of focus on their original annuity and insurance business seems to have been a result of both the Archer taxation and pressures from participants wanting more options, as Dick said. This was during the tech bull market, and some thought that TIAA-CREF had become stodgy. Whatever the causes, the change was unfortunate. There's a lot to be said for stodgy and KISS.
John
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Despite the post-1997 changes, they still seem to be a good company. Do many here use them? If you could take advantage of their funds, annuities and Vanguard funds (albeit Investor grade) would you?
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Here's a data point. In mid-career I left my research job in California to play Engineering Prof. at a Big Ten school. That was in '83-84. I lasted three semesters, then decided to return to my old job. I chose 50% TIAA Traditional and 50% CREF stock. Except for my first MRD last year, I never touched the account: no rebalancing, no withdrawals---nothing. Thirty years later:
TIAA: $39K
CREF: $86K
My contributions were $4.8K to each.
TIAA: $39K
CREF: $86K
My contributions were $4.8K to each.
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 7:27 pm
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I suspect that the university also contributed to the account. Otherwise that would be about a 9% growth rate.Intheheadlights wrote:My contributions were $4.8K to each.
Dick
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I misspoke: those were Purdue's contributions; I contributed nothing. I too am kinda stunned by the return. I don't have the my records from back then, but those are what the TIAA/CREF website states were the contributions.
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I've been in TIAA-CREF since 1984, have always allocated my contributions 50/50 between TIAA Traditional and CREF Stock, and have never rebalanced between them. I once posted a graph via flickr.com, but the link seems to have expired and I can't find my flickr login information so I can't fix it.Browser wrote:Recently, I found myself wondering how things would have turned out if I'd continued to work in academe and followed this 50/50 formula (never rebalancing) for the 35 years of so of my working career.
The highlights are as follows, in terms of the % of the total balance in CREF Stock at various points in time:
1984-1995: slow increase to about 54%
1995-2000: accelerated increase to about 66% (dot-com boom)
2000-2003: decrease to about 47%
2003-2007: increase to about 59%
2008-2009: decrease to about 41%
2009-present: increase to about 56%
During 3-4Q 2008 and 1Q 2009, my CREF Stock balance decreased 37.6%, my TIAA Traditional balance increased 6.6%, and the total decreased 17.5%. During that period I continued contributions as before.
Last edited by 22twain on Thu Aug 08, 2013 12:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Meet my pet, Peeve, who loves to convert non-acronyms into acronyms: FED, ROTH, CASH, IVY, ...
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I have a mix of VG and T-C funds. Namely, VG index funds (e.g., SP500 + Extended) as well as TIAA Real Estate and Trad annuity.jasg wrote:Despite the post-1997 changes, they still seem to be a good company. Do many here use them? If you could take advantage of their funds, annuities and Vanguard funds (albeit Investor grade) would you?
-
- Posts: 49027
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
They are still a good company but I believe ERs have crept up. There is quite an active TIAA board on Morningstar.jasg wrote:Despite the post-1997 changes, they still seem to be a good company. Do many here use them? If you could take advantage of their funds, annuities and Vanguard funds (albeit Investor grade) would you?
The RE Annuity is basically unique for individual investors in the USA, and so merits attention. So in a way is TIAA 'Trad' and that is a relatively safe way of investing money.
If you don't have access to VG then TIAA is not a bad fund manager to invest with-- eg for university employees.
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I was in a TIAA-CREF plan for all 41 years of my employment.
While I can't answer the OP's question directly, I will say that a lot of the success of long-time T-C participants has to do with high contribution percentages.
From day one of my employment, I was required to contribute 5% of my nominal salary to my T-C 403(b) plan, while the university/employer contributed 10%. I've seen these percentages at other places also.
In addition, we could setup optional Supplemental Retirement Accounts with upper limits increasing most years up to $23,000 as of 2013.
Starting early with decent percentages like this is half the battle...
While I can't answer the OP's question directly, I will say that a lot of the success of long-time T-C participants has to do with high contribution percentages.
From day one of my employment, I was required to contribute 5% of my nominal salary to my T-C 403(b) plan, while the university/employer contributed 10%. I've seen these percentages at other places also.
In addition, we could setup optional Supplemental Retirement Accounts with upper limits increasing most years up to $23,000 as of 2013.
Starting early with decent percentages like this is half the battle...
Attempted new signature...
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
Here is a data point from a 1977/78 investment in TIAA/CREF. I opened an SRA (supplementary retirement account) and contributed $100 a month for 15 months, 50% to TIAA Traditional and 50% to CREF Stock. I have not touched that account over these many years. As of August 7, 2013 the $750 invested in TIAA Traditional had grown to $7,807; the $750 invested in CREF Stock had grown to $23,591.
The late 70s were a very good time to put money into stocks. But I did not know that.
Jim
The late 70s were a very good time to put money into stocks. But I did not know that.
Jim
-
- Posts: 49027
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I imagine, though, that since most academics are not finished their Phd (and postdocs) till aged 26-28 they are not starting paying in in significant amounts until similar ages as their peers?The Wizard wrote:I was in a TIAA-CREF plan for all 41 years of my employment.
While I can't answer the OP's question directly, I will say that a lot of the success of long-time T-C participants has to do with high contribution percentages.
From day one of my employment, I was required to contribute 5% of my nominal salary to my T-C 403(b) plan, while the university/employer contributed 10%. I've seen these percentages at other places also.
In addition, we could setup optional Supplemental Retirement Accounts with upper limits increasing most years up to $23,000 as of 2013.
Starting early with decent percentages like this is half the battle...
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
From what I'm reading, most people in any kind of career are not starting serious investing in their early 20's. Also, for those academics who successfully climb up the standard promotion ladder, they will likely have good institutional match programs in their 403b's and few if any job interruptions.Valuethinker wrote:I imagine, though, that since most academics are not finished their Phd (and postdocs) till aged 26-28 they are not starting paying in in significant amounts until similar ages as their peers?The Wizard wrote:I was in a TIAA-CREF plan for all 41 years of my employment.
While I can't answer the OP's question directly, I will say that a lot of the success of long-time T-C participants has to do with high contribution percentages.
From day one of my employment, I was required to contribute 5% of my nominal salary to my T-C 403(b) plan, while the university/employer contributed 10%. I've seen these percentages at other places also.
In addition, we could setup optional Supplemental Retirement Accounts with upper limits increasing most years up to $23,000 as of 2013.
Starting early with decent percentages like this is half the battle...
-
- Posts: 49027
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:07 am
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
But that's not the point The Wizard was making. He said it was contributions, substantial, early. I wondered if that was so 'early' given that most academics do not really start their careers until their late 20s?Garco wrote:From what I'm reading, most people in any kind of career are not starting serious investing in their early 20's. Also, for those academics who successfully climb up the standard promotion ladder, they will likely have good institutional match programs in their 403b's and few if any job interruptions.Valuethinker wrote:I imagine, though, that since most academics are not finished their Phd (and postdocs) till aged 26-28 they are not starting paying in in significant amounts until similar ages as their peers?The Wizard wrote:I was in a TIAA-CREF plan for all 41 years of my employment.
While I can't answer the OP's question directly, I will say that a lot of the success of long-time T-C participants has to do with high contribution percentages.
From day one of my employment, I was required to contribute 5% of my nominal salary to my T-C 403(b) plan, while the university/employer contributed 10%. I've seen these percentages at other places also.
In addition, we could setup optional Supplemental Retirement Accounts with upper limits increasing most years up to $23,000 as of 2013.
Starting early with decent percentages like this is half the battle...
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
If, as an academic, you start contributing 15% per annum (5% + 10% match) to a 403b from age 28 (for me it was 27) every year til age 67 you're going to have a lot of money. Yes, it would be nice to start earlier, but how many people really do?
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I started when I first started teaching. Auto contributed for 7 years until I got the boot by missing tenure. Then I totally forgot about it -- if I had known how to do it, I would have withdrawn everything. Good thing I didn't because 10 years later it had grown to a nice sum.Garco wrote:If, as an academic, you start contributing 15% per annum (5% + 10% match) to a 403b from age 28 (for me it was 27) every year til age 67 you're going to have a lot of money. Yes, it would be nice to start earlier, but how many people really do?
We don't know where we are, or where we're going -- but we're making good time.
-
- Posts: 13356
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:45 pm
- Location: Reading, MA
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
By early, I meant relative to starting full employment. We've had more than one poster recently out of college with large student loans and possibly other household startup expenses who decides to put off retirement investing until finances are looking better. That's not always the best way to go...Garco wrote:If, as an academic, you start contributing 15% per annum (5% + 10% match) to a 403b from age 28 (for me it was 27) every year til age 67 you're going to have a lot of money. Yes, it would be nice to start earlier, but how many people really do?
Attempted new signature...
Re: The fate of the 50/50 TIAA-CREF portfolio?
I agree. I'm trying to convince my daughter that despite her very large loan overhang (which I'm going to help her to eliminate) she should be putting money to work in tax deferred savings/investments. I think sometimes people think putting in only $5K a year isn't going to matter enough and they can make it up later. They need to become acquainted with the wonders of compound growth.