Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
A general question, are there distinct advantages or disadvantages to owning a 'balanced' fund (60% stocks/40% bonds) over two funds like total stock index (60%) and total bond (40%)
"When nothing goes right....go left"
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:21 pm
- Location: New York
The balanced fund is simpler, and so better in that way. But when making withdrawals, you would take money on a pro-rata basis from both stocks and bonds. If you owned seperate stock and bond funds you could make withdrawals from only one (presumably the one that's above its allocation percentage).
- Posts: 2873
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:53 pm
A balanced fund hides volatility from you, so that can be an advantage for folks who do not like to see big drops (nobody complains about big gains) in their fund.
But when you withdraw from a balanced fund, you are selling equities AND fixed income, when it may have been better to sell one or the other.
Balanced fund in taxable is less tax efficient. This was discussed recently at length on the forum.
If you have a tax-advantaged account and cannot force yourself to rebalance (buy low, sell high), then let a balanced fund do it for you.
It's all about short-term opportunistic rebalancing due to a short-term change in one's asset allocation, uh, I mean opportunistic rebalancing, uh I mean rebalancing, uh I mean market timing.
- Posts: 32515
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:00 pm
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: abovo, aguyyo, ajcp, berntson, DonCamillo, Eureka, freyj6, Ged, RobertAlanK, sschullo, Tamales, Taylor Larimore, TSR, Twins Fan and 87 guests