Discuss all general (i.e. non-personal) investing questions and issues, investing news, and theory.
A general question, are there distinct advantages or disadvantages to owning a 'balanced' fund (60% stocks/40% bonds) over two funds like total stock index (60%) and total bond (40%)
“Miracles come in cans not in can'ts"
- Posts: 625
- Joined: 7 Nov 2012
- Location: New York
The balanced fund is simpler, and so better in that way. But when making withdrawals, you would take money on a pro-rata basis from both stocks and bonds. If you owned seperate stock and bond funds you could make withdrawals from only one (presumably the one that's above its allocation percentage).
- Posts: 2699
- Joined: 20 Feb 2007
A balanced fund hides volatility from you, so that can be an advantage for folks who do not like to see big drops (nobody complains about big gains) in their fund.
But when you withdraw from a balanced fund, you are selling equities AND fixed income, when it may have been better to sell one or the other.
Balanced fund in taxable is less tax efficient. This was discussed recently at length on the forum.
If you have a tax-advantaged account and cannot force yourself to rebalance (buy low, sell high), then let a balanced fund do it for you.
It's all about market timing, uh, I mean rebalancing, uh, I mean opportunistic rebalancing, uh, I mean short-term opportunistic rebalancing due to a short-term change in one's asset allocation.
- Posts: 28749
- Joined: 1 Mar 2007
Return to Investing - Theory, News & General
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: apex84, Boonedog, cal2ny, columbia, EyeDee, hornet96, jdb, Kosmo, MSNbot Media, Professor Emeritus, Rolyatroba, steelhorse, sunnyday, vesalius, youngindexer and 72 guests