Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:09 am
Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
Hi, I'm a recent retiree and decided to adapt the Bogleheads' three-fund portfolio asset allocation strategy. After a number of shufflings of my investment, I made a biggest trade of my portfolio:moving my IRA money (rolled over from my 401k), representing ~20% of my total asset, to a bond fund(I'm now ~10% cash/44% stocks/46% bonds).
However, I made a mistake buying VBILX, instead of VBTLX (see comparison below, During trade, as I typed in VB, VBILX popped up as the first choice). I could correct the mistake by selling and re-buying, but then I thought do I really need to? Why not, VBILX? Two funds are not that dissimilar. My impression is that the long bonds are not that good an asset class to own now. Would it be prudent to let VBILX to ride for a while and make the necessary change later when the long bonds look a little more attractive. Your thought? (trading cost is a non-issue as I can trade free)
VBILV (Vanguard Intermediate Bond Index Admiral): 2.98% yield, 0.1% expenses, 14.8B assets, -2.89% YTD
VBTLX (Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Admiral): 2.46% yield, 0.1% expenses, 109B assets, -1.95% YTD
However, I made a mistake buying VBILX, instead of VBTLX (see comparison below, During trade, as I typed in VB, VBILX popped up as the first choice). I could correct the mistake by selling and re-buying, but then I thought do I really need to? Why not, VBILX? Two funds are not that dissimilar. My impression is that the long bonds are not that good an asset class to own now. Would it be prudent to let VBILX to ride for a while and make the necessary change later when the long bonds look a little more attractive. Your thought? (trading cost is a non-issue as I can trade free)
VBILV (Vanguard Intermediate Bond Index Admiral): 2.98% yield, 0.1% expenses, 14.8B assets, -2.89% YTD
VBTLX (Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Admiral): 2.46% yield, 0.1% expenses, 109B assets, -1.95% YTD
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
The fund names might cause you to think incorrectly about thier holdings. If you look a the average duration of each, you will see that VBTLX is at 5.5 years while VBILX is at 6.5 years. While Total Bond has a mix of long, medium, and short term bonds, on average it has a lower duration (i.e. less interest rate risk) than Intermediate Bond.
I would not let a trading mistake alter my strategy. As you said, the cost to trade into the one you intended is zero.
I would not let a trading mistake alter my strategy. As you said, the cost to trade into the one you intended is zero.
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
OP, I do not know where you got the yields from, but you the numbers you give are much too high. Much. They are about 1/2% lower. I frankly would use Vanguard Intermediate term investment grade which yields about 1/2% more than the intermediate index and about a % more than total bond index.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:09 am
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
I got the yield numbers from morningstar.com. Do you have the symbols for the "investment grade" funds? Thanks,Calm Man wrote:OP, I do not know where you got the yields from, but you the numbers you give are much too high. Much. They are about 1/2% lower. I frankly would use Vanguard Intermediate term investment grade which yields about 1/2% more than the intermediate index and about a % more than total bond index.
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:09 am
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
Yeah, that makes sense as VBILX appears to be a tad higher yields but more volatiles.burma7734 wrote:The fund names might cause you to think incorrectly about thier holdings. If you look a the average duration of each, you will see that VBTLX is at 5.5 years while VBILX is at 6.5 years. While Total Bond has a mix of long, medium, and short term bonds, on average it has a lower duration (i.e. less interest rate risk) than Intermediate Bond.
I would not let a trading mistake alter my strategy. As you said, the cost to trade into the one you intended is zero.
- Taylor Larimore
- Posts: 32839
- Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm
- Location: Miami FL
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
Whodatheads:whodatheads wrote:Hi, I'm a recent retiree and decided to adapt the Bogleheads' three-fund portfolio asset allocation strategy. After a number of shufflings of my investment, I made a biggest trade of my portfolio:moving my IRA money (rolled over from my 401k), representing ~20% of my total asset, to a bond fund(I'm now ~10% cash/44% stocks/46% bonds).
However, I made a mistake buying VBILX, instead of VBTLX (see comparison below, During trade, as I typed in VB, VBILX popped up as the first choice). I could correct the mistake by selling and re-buying, but then I thought do I really need to? Why not, VBILX? Two funds are not that dissimilar. My impression is that the long bonds are not that good an asset class to own now. Would it be prudent to let VBILX to ride for a while and make the necessary change later when the long bonds look a little more attractive. Your thought? (trading cost is a non-issue as I can trade free)
VBILV (Vanguard Intermediate Bond Index Admiral): 2.98% yield, 0.1% expenses, 14.8B assets, -2.89% YTD
VBTLX (Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Admiral): 2.46% yield, 0.1% expenses, 109B assets, -1.95% YTD
In my opinion, either of these two Vanguard bond funds will provide safety and income in the bond portion of your Three Fund Portfolio. I slightly prefer Total Bond Market for its better diversification (lower risk).
Best wishes.
Taylor
"Simplicity is the master key to financial success." -- Jack Bogle
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
Both funds are very good, with similar durations. VBTLX is preferred by some, since it has a slightly shorter duration and more government bonds/higher credit ratings. VBILX is preferred by others since it does not hold any mortgage-backed securities.
- Archie Sinclair
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:03 am
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
You should use the SEC yield quoted every day at Vanguard.com, not Morningstar's numbers. Morningstar may not be updated frequently, and sometimes gives only trailing twelve-month yield, which is next to useless.whodatheads wrote:I got the yield numbers from morningstar.com. Do you have the symbols for the "investment grade" funds? Thanks,Calm Man wrote:OP, I do not know where you got the yields from, but you the numbers you give are much too high. Much. They are about 1/2% lower. I frankly would use Vanguard Intermediate term investment grade which yields about 1/2% more than the intermediate index and about a % more than total bond index.
- Sunny Sarkar
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 12:02 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
- Contact:
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
In the 2012 Bogleheads reunion, Jack Bogle said that a half & half blend of high quality corporates & treasuries would be a very good bond portfolio. Guess which fund has that mix.whodatheads wrote:I made a mistake buying VBILX, instead of VBTLX
"Buy-and-hold, long-term, all-market-index strategies, implemented at rock-bottom cost, are the surest of all routes to the accumulation of wealth" - John C. Bogle
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
There's your answer from a truly wise man. Don't agonize over it......Taylor Larimore wrote: In my opinion, either of these two Vanguard bond funds will provide safety and income in the bond portion of your Three Fund Portfolio. I slightly prefer Total Bond Market for its better diversification (lower risk).
Best wishes.
Taylor
1210
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
whodatheads wrote:I got the yield numbers from morningstar.com. Do you have the symbols for the "investment grade" funds? Thanks,Calm Man wrote:OP, I do not know where you got the yields from, but you the numbers you give are much too high. Much. They are about 1/2% lower. I frankly would use Vanguard Intermediate term investment grade which yields about 1/2% more than the intermediate index and about a % more than total bond index.
I see. Well morningstar differs from Vanguard. Go to the Vanguard site and you can see every fund they have. I don't use symbols as they confuse me !!!!
Re: Three-Fund Portfolio - VBTLX vs. VBILX
Morningstar also rates VBILX as having HIGH historic risk, and shows it in the high interest rate sensitivity category. I'm looking at the Schwab summary page on each fund.
VBTLX in contrast is in the AVERAGE historic risk. Just glancing at the 10 year graphs for the two funds both appear to follow quite similar tracks.
But this "high risk" warning scares me off of VBILX. I'm about to redeploy about .6 million in my IRA and I want to find that sweet spot of low cost, low risk, and some reliable return on investment. I suppose I'll go with the lower risk, lower return option.
VBTLX in contrast is in the AVERAGE historic risk. Just glancing at the 10 year graphs for the two funds both appear to follow quite similar tracks.
But this "high risk" warning scares me off of VBILX. I'm about to redeploy about .6 million in my IRA and I want to find that sweet spot of low cost, low risk, and some reliable return on investment. I suppose I'll go with the lower risk, lower return option.