Bonds within LifeStrategy Funds
Bonds within LifeStrategy Funds
I have a 5-10 year horizon and am trying to decide between LifeStrategy Moderate Growth and LifeStrategy Conservative Growth. Should rising interest rates be factored into my decision? That is, would LifeStrategy Moderate Growth be a safer choice in today's market because it has a smaller percentage of bonds?
Re: Bonds within LifeStrategy Funds
I think equity risk should be a much bigger concern for investors than interest rate risk. Investment grade bonds are down between 1% and 5% on the year. You can lose that much in an afternoon with stocks.
IMO, the 60% stocks in the Moderate Growth fund is much to risky for a time frame of 5-10 years. But I suppose that depends on how much you'll need the money at the end of that horizon.
David Swensen (in Unconventional Success) and Larry Swedroe (in several different books, I believe) provide guidelines for how much stocks one could reasonably hold with a time frame of x years. I posted this in greater detail here: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 71#p398271. For a 10 year horizon, they both agree you could take up to 70% equity risk, but for a 5 year horizon, you should have a max of about 20% to 30%. By the time you're 2-3 years away, you should have 0% stocks.
On the fixed income side, if you can't tolerate any loss, then CDs and savings accounts would probably be the way to go. Depending on how little risk you are willing to take, you might want to go 100% CDs, and skip the stocks altogether.
IMO, the 60% stocks in the Moderate Growth fund is much to risky for a time frame of 5-10 years. But I suppose that depends on how much you'll need the money at the end of that horizon.
David Swensen (in Unconventional Success) and Larry Swedroe (in several different books, I believe) provide guidelines for how much stocks one could reasonably hold with a time frame of x years. I posted this in greater detail here: http://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtop ... 71#p398271. For a 10 year horizon, they both agree you could take up to 70% equity risk, but for a 5 year horizon, you should have a max of about 20% to 30%. By the time you're 2-3 years away, you should have 0% stocks.
On the fixed income side, if you can't tolerate any loss, then CDs and savings accounts would probably be the way to go. Depending on how little risk you are willing to take, you might want to go 100% CDs, and skip the stocks altogether.
Don't assume I know what I'm talking about.
Re: Bonds within LifeStrategy Funds
The psychology of bonds these days is really wild. Seeking a fund with fewer bonds to be safer? The bonds in this fund could drop 10% in a really bad year, stocks can do 10% in a day. The stocks in this fund could drop 50% in a really bad year... More bonds = safer, period.Kelty wrote:That is, would LifeStrategy Moderate Growth be a safer choice in today's market because it has a smaller percentage of bonds?
I guess it only takes 3 - 5 years for people to totally forget a stock market crash.
70% Global Stocks / 30% Bonds