BrandonBogle wrote:Recently started a thread to get some advice on getting my Mom on track with her portfolio, and thought I should probably look at mine too. There is a lot to go consolidate here, so hopefully I provide meaningful info to everyone. There has GOT to be an easier way to manage future contributions to my accounts so I don't get buried in trade confirmations!
Emergency funds: Yes, 3 months
Debt:
- Auto 1, 1.99%
- Auto 2, 1.49% (Cashed out equity to pay off 7% student loans)
- Auto 3, 2.49% (GF's car, she's paying but if anything every happens, I need to consider this my debt)
- Mortgage, 2.75% (28 years remaining)
- Student Loans, 4.5%
Expenses:
- $2,700/month
Tax Filing Status: Single
Tax Rate: xx% Federal, xx% State (will update these once I find my forms, but I know I'm on the lower end)
State of Residence: NC
Age: 30
Portfolio size: low six figure
Desired Asset allocation: 80% stocks / 20% bonds
Desired International allocation: 33% of stocks
Current Retirement Assets
%s is of total assets
Taxable (17%)
Almost missed these, I don't hold individual stocks, too much risk. However there are tax considerations to selling.
Between this your Roth and your company stock, over 37% of you portfolio is in individual stocks, not very Bogleheadish.
- 14.4% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
I would reconsider all of the following. See Below.
- 0.03% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.06% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.04% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.09% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
- 0.02% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.02% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) <-- Your taking a sector bet. Would not be my choice.
- 0.01% Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) <-- I can't see a reason for this either.
Roth IRA (19%)
- 13.6% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
Again I would reconsider the following.
- 0.06% SPDR S&P Intl Small ETF (GWX)
- 0.14% SPDR SER Trust ETF (PSK)
- 0.06% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.06% Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ)
- 0.1% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.49% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.001% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)
- 0.32% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.25% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
Traditional 401k at Vanguard - Previous Employer (7%)
- 2.52% Vanguard 500 Index Fund Signal (VIFSX)
- 0.81% Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Signal (VEMSX)
- 0.001% Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund Institutional (VMRXX)
- 0.81% Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor (VGTSX)
The following two funds, while good, are only going to make determining your AA more of an annoyance.
- 1.07% Vanguard Wellington Fund Investor (VWELX)
- 1.74% Vanguard Windsor Fund Investor (VWNDX)
Traditional 401k at Current Employer (57%)
- 4.56% Stable Value, 0.20% ER, 2.5% Blended Yield, 2.2 year duration, 41% turnover
Why do you have all three of the following funds? They completely overlap each other. I would simply hold - 3.42% SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER.
- 9.69% Large Cap Value, 0.40% ER, Underlying = Dodge & Cox Stock, T.Rowe Equity Income, MFS Large Cap
- 3.42% SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER
- 6.84% Large Cap Growth, 0.50% ER, Underlying = T.Rowe Blue Chip Growth, Neuberger Berman Disciplined Large Cap Growth, Winslow Large Cap Growth
No comment on the following.
- 6.84% SSgA S&P Mid Cap Index, 0.06% ER
Instead of the following fund I would hold SSgA Russell Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER.
- 4.56% Small Cap, 0.59% ER, Underlying = Wellington Select Small Cap Growth, Wellington Small Cap Value
Instead of the following fund I would hold SSgA International Index, 0.09% ER.
- 6.84% Intl Equity, Undisclosed ER (Fact sheet will be provided late-Feb, 2013), Underlying = Amnerican Funds EuroPacific Growth, Harbot Intl Fund
No comment on the following.
- 4.56% Lazard/Wilmington Emerging Markets Equity, 0.90% ER
Can you sell any of this following position or must you hold it? I wouldn't hold more than 5% of my portfolio in my company's stock.
- 9.69% Company Stock (100% of employer match paid in company stock)
Contributions
New Annual Contributions
- Max Roth IRA ($5,500)
- Max Traditional 401k ($17,500)
Available Funds in 401k
Dow Jones Target Funds (2055 = WFQUX)
100% Treasury MMKT, 0.30% ER
SSgA U.S. Bond Index, 0.06% ER
SSgA PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond I, 0.70% ER
SSgA Russell Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER
SSgA International Index, 0.09% ER
SSgA NASDAQ 100 Index, 0.07% ER
Available Funds in Taxable and Roth
Brokerage account without trading fees. Vanguard funds and ETFs are available, amongst others.
Key Points
- #1 I'd like to make future investments easier, but essentially I'm on auto-pilot right now, buying more of what I already have.
- NOT re-investing dividends from taxable at this time (about 3k/year)
- MUCH prefer changing AA by new contributions rather than selling any existing holdings
- Each category of holdings has recovered since market crash, but some individual lots do have losses if tax loss harvesting is employed
Questions
1. Would it be reasonable to ignore everything except the large-caps in my Taxable and Roth since they represent a few percentage points at most?
Yes. I would suggest that any holding less than 5% of the portfolio in any one position is so insignificant in its effect, that it is not worth the hassle maintaining it.
2. At 30 years old, is 80/20 (s/b) and 66/33 (US/Intl) a good mix? Vanguard's tool for my questions came to 56% TSM, 24% TIS, 20% TBM
This is fine.
3. Since buying the house two years ago, I have used the dividends in my taxable to make updates/fixes to the house so I can work on rebuilding my emergency fund. The emergency fund is at 3 months, but I'd like to get it to 6 months. I have not contributed to my taxable in the past 4 years and have kept the dividends for the past two. Is not reinvesting the dividends still a good idea or am I shooting myself in the foot long-term (note, I'm still maxing out all tax-advantaged accounts).
You may not want to reinvest dividends anyway. It interferes with Tax Loss Harvesting.
4. Any other thoughts/suggestions?
BrandonBogle wrote:Taxable (17%)
- 14.4% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
- 0.03% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.06% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.04% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.09% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
- 0.02% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.02% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)
- 0.01% Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)
BrandonBogle wrote:Roth IRA (19%)
- 13.6% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
- 0.06% SPDR S&P Intl Small ETF (GWX)
- 0.14% SPDR SER Trust ETF (PSK)
- 0.06% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.06% Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ)
- 0.1% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.49% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.001% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)
- 0.32% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.25% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
Risk can be reduced through diversification.
The risk of investing in a single risky security, such as a stock or corporate bond, is very high due to the company-specific risks. Any number of unfortunate events could impact the rate of return. In the worst possible case, the company could go bankrupt, and the investor could lose the entire value of the investment. Company-specific risk is generally referred to as unsystematic risk or nonsystematic risk. Other names are unique-risk, firm-specific risk, or diversifiable risk.
Unsystematic risk can be eliminated by holding a broad portfolio of risky assets; e.g., many different securities in many different industries. This is easy to accomplish by owning a total market stock or bond index fund. Unsystematic risk is risk that can be "diversified away."
BrandonBogle wrote:- Student Loans, 4.5%
Tax Rate: 25% Federal, 7% State (marginal)
Taxable (17%)
- 14.25% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
- 0.31% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.64% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.36% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.89% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
- 0.16% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.14% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)
- 0.10% Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)
- NOT re-investing dividends from taxable at this time (about 3k/year)
- Each category of holdings has recovered since market crash, but some individual lots do have losses if tax loss harvesting is employed
Its comforting to get the dividend payments to out towards other holdings.
bdpb wrote:Is it comfortable paying income taxes on your taxable holdings? Probably not. Sell your taxable holdings and pay off your school loan. The cost of your school loan is higher than the yield on any of your bonds. At least use any dividends this way.
Next time the market crashes don't wait for the holdings to come back. Tax Loss Harvest instead. If you have losses, TLH now.
bdpb wrote:Is it comfortable paying income taxes on your taxable holdings? Probably not. Sell your taxable holdings and pay off your school loan. The cost of your school loan is higher than the yield on any of your bonds. At least use any dividends this way.
Next time the market crashes don't wait for the holdings to come back. Tax Loss Harvest instead. If you have losses, TLH now.
BrandonBogle wrote:I like the global strategy you have of:
14% Individual Stocks (In taxable, mostly to avoid taxes)
42% Total Stock Market
24% Total International Stock Market
20% Total Bond Market
Of course, that would be "mostly" because of our company stock . I will take a look at preparing the sells in the Taxable and Roth first thing in February (heading out of town Friday and don't want to rush through this tomorrow). I'll rebalance the current 401k at the same time.
BrandonBogle wrote:In the Taxable and Roth, I have Vanguard Fund choices as well. The ETFs are because my previous brokerage didn't have Vanguard Funds available, this one does. Would there be a preference either way, when my brokerage accounts are trade commission fee and I'm a long-term investor? I am not worried about spreads -- what day of the week I do the buy on would likely make more of a difference and trying to time that would be market timing!
BrandonBogle wrote:I totally forgot to list the funds available in my old 401k at Vanguard. That's in there now if that makes a difference on which fund to put there. I do have access to some Signal shares to help with keeping ER down. For instance, I have Vanguard Total Bond Mkt Index Institutional (VBTIX) with 0.07% ER as an option.
BrandonBogle wrote:As for bringing the holdings into balance, should I DCA or just jump right in?
BrandonBogle wrote:Desired Asset allocation: 80% stocks / 20% bonds
Desired International allocation: 33% of stocks
BrandonBogle wrote:Taxable (17%)
- 14.25% Large Cap individual stocks (like MMM, XOM, JNJ, KRFT, etc.)
- 0.31% Commonwealth REIT (CWH)
- 0.64% Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO)
- 0.36% Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (VEA)
- 0.89% Vanguard MSCI EMRG ETF (VWO)
- 0.16% Vanguard Small Cap ETF (VB)
- 0.14% Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT)
- 0.10% Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)
goodoboy wrote:BrandonBogle wrote:Desired Asset allocation: 80% stocks / 20% bonds
Desired International allocation: 33% of stocks
The 80% stocks includes the allocation of international stocks as well.n
So you can mix it like this:
80% stocks / 20% bonds
60% -Total Stock Market Index
20% - International Stocks
20% - Bonds
goodoboy wrote:You should consider taking money from taxable accounts and paying off debt at an early age. I just sold all stocks and paid off my 5.5% student loan. This will free up more cash flow to either:
1. pay more towards mortgage to pay off in 15 year
2. Contribute more to 401K
3. Pay off more debt.
This will let you focus more on your Roth and 401k allocation and makes things easier for you.
BrandonBogle wrote:goodoboy wrote:BrandonBogle wrote:
I don't know if that will work for me, though I'd agree with that in general. After today's selloff of capital losses (to effectively harvest in March), my other taxable holds would take a significant tax hit. Atop that, I'm already maxing the 401k and Roth annually, so any savings would go towards debts and/or taxable accounts. I could see the argument for a 15 year mortgage, but at this time, I am paying aggressively on my other debts. My student loans will be paid off in 6 years max, though likely less if no unexpected expenses -- I'm using taxable dividends and living frugally to to pay another 6x of my student loan payment each month, and any raises and/or bonuses with be split 50/50 to COL increases and debt paydown. Once all that is done, I would consider paying off the house sooner. Right now though, the mortgage balance and rate help me focus my efforts elsewhere. Ideally, in two-three years, I want to be debt-free except for mortgage. I'm considering getting rid of Auto 1 to free up cash flow to even make things go faster. That will be a decision later in the year though around April or so.
goodoboy wrote:Why wait 6 years and you can pay off now? use some of the gains to pay off the capital gain taxes. How much is your student loan remaining balance and how much money in taxable account? If enough to pay off student loan, I will pay this off. I was in a similar situation like you, I recently sold off all my stocks, including the one that was paying $3000 a year in dividends. Some of it went to savings as well. Dave Ramsey say pay off all debt, besides mortgage, before contributing more to 401k.
You don't have to contribute max to 401K yet. This is just my opinon. Many here will tell you to pay off the student loan first before maxing out anything. Its a guarnteed return.
BrandonBogle wrote:goodoboy wrote:Why wait 6 years and you can pay off now? use some of the gains to pay off the capital gain taxes. How much is your student loan remaining balance and how much money in taxable account? If enough to pay off student loan, I will pay this off. I was in a similar situation like you, I recently sold off all my stocks, including the one that was paying $3000 a year in dividends. Some of it went to savings as well. Dave Ramsey say pay off all debt, besides mortgage, before contributing more to 401k.
You don't have to contribute max to 401K yet. This is just my opinon. Many here will tell you to pay off the student loan first before maxing out anything. Its a guarnteed return.
The student loan is tax-deductible and would be paid off in 2 (aggressive) - 6 (conservative) years on the 20 year left of 25 year loan. The taxable dividends, even after taxes (8% @ 22% effective tax rate = 6.24% after taxes), are beating the rate on my student loan (4.5% @ 22% effective tax rate = 3.51% after taxes). To me, it makes greater sense to keep the taxable account and continue to pay down the student loans with my excess funds and the earnings from the taxable. Don't I come out
ahead that way?
goodoboy wrote:That's just my opinion. I like keeping things very very simple. You can keep the student loan if needed. I just belive in following a systematic approach, pay debt, max out tax sheltered accounts and then play in the stocks market if you have extra money and time.
Most people would say no debt is the best debt beside mortage.
BrandonBogle wrote:goodoboy wrote:That's just my opinion. I like keeping things very very simple. You can keep the student loan if needed. I just belive in following a systematic approach, pay debt, max out tax sheltered accounts and then play in the stocks market if you have extra money and time.
Most people would say no debt is the best debt beside mortage.
Thanks goodoboy. I can understand and agree with the premise and for many that would be the right thing to do. In my case though, it's not a tax-effective move, doesn't affect my cash flow (loan isn't putting pressure on my cash flow). Had the loan not had a low interest, tax advantaged rate, I'd be willing to consider killing it off.
BrandonBogle wrote:At the moment yes. I'm sure I'll have some questions next week after the dust settles, but I've got some steps ahead of me at least to starting making happen. The fun part is likely going to be with rebalancing the 401ks. Thank goodness it's all tax-deferred or there would be lots of heart burn!
FinancialDave wrote:I agree with the relatively few themes above that say you need to pay OFF your debt now!
Beyond the obvious that they are generating a negative return for you while you are putting money in bond funds that are not likely to pay you more in the near future.
The market is at a current 5 year high, so now is a very appropriate time to pay off those debts. I have not studied all your assets in enough detail to recommend exactly which funds to use, but if it was me I would probably do a combination of:
1. Stopping all new funds that are going into any bond allocation, even though it means you won't do the max to your retirement accounts -- pay off the student loans first.
2. Use a portion of your taxable account to pay off the student loans and 3 car loans as well.
3. Make a plan to get all loans paid off by the end of the year, if at all possible, if not cut back on retirement investments. Remember, you can regain your Roth allocation up until Apr 15th of next year, so use this to your advantage to still max it out but ONLY after you pay off your loans.
fd
damjam wrote:As to whether you should pay your debt now or keep paying over time, I need to ask whether you understand the risk of continuing to hold your stocks.
You did say earlier that your stocks that you have held for years have increased in value 50% or more.
Have you held those stocks since before the 2008/09 crash?
Are you prepared for MMM to fall to $45.46 per share as it did on 2/27/2009 and stay there for months or even years?
I could go through the list of stocks you gave but I hope you get the idea, what goes up can and will go down.
Paying off debt is a sure thing. Holding stock is not.
Having said that however, I wouldn't make myself completely illiquid by spending down my entire taxable account to pay down debt.
I just had to put that out there. It's completely your choice of course.
FinancialDave wrote:As I said before, take what ever allocation you were going to put towards the bonds and use it to pay down the debts. This is a GUARANTEED return at whatever the interest rate is - you won't get this from the bonds. When the debt is paid off, you have an income increase that can now go to pay down the next debt, a very simple way to get your debts paid off in a hurry.
I don't understand the logic to give up a guarantee, when the alternative is you are taking a negative return on all the interest you are paying. It is just dragging you down the whole time. The sooner the debt is paid off the sooner you will have a pay increase that allows you to put more money away for retirement.
fd
Employer Stock or Securities. There is a special rule for a payment from the Plan that includes employer stock (or other employer securities). To use this special rule, 1) the payment must qualify as a lump sum distribution, as described above, except that you do not need five years of plan participation, or 2) the employer stock included in the payment must be attributable to “after-tax” employee contributions, if any. Under this special rule, you may have the option of not paying tax on the “net unrealized appreciation” of the stock until you sell the stock. Net unrealized appreciation generally is the increase in the value of the employer stock while it was held by the Plan. For example, if employer stock was contributed to your Plan account when the stock was worth $1,000 but the stock was worth $1,200 when you received it, you would not have to pay tax on the $200 increase in value until you later sold the stock.
You may instead elect not to have the special rule apply to the net unrealized appreciation. In this case, your net unrealized appreciation will be taxed in the year you receive the stock, unless you roll over the stock. The stock (including any net unrealized appreciation) can be rolled over to a traditional IRA or another eligible employer plan, either in a direct rollover or a rollover that you make yourself. Generally, you will no longer be eligible to use the special rule for net unrealized appreciation if you roll the stock over to a traditional IRA or another eligible employer plan.
BrandonBogle wrote:Got a new wrinkle. I was putting in the transfers of holdings inside my current 401k and came across the following. Sounds like since I was invested in the ESOP, I'd be able to take out the funds (at 59 1/2 I presume) as company stock WITH cost-basis from the original purchases. Right now, the value of the company stock is 96% cost-basis, meaning I've only had 4% growth (I carried through the market collapse and buildup). So while I carry risk holding the company stock and it represents 9.6% of my total portfolio, should I still hold onto it to avoid paying taxes on the original cost basis?
dbr wrote:BrandonBogle wrote:Got a new wrinkle. I was putting in the transfers of holdings inside my current 401k and came across the following. Sounds like since I was invested in the ESOP, I'd be able to take out the funds (at 59 1/2 I presume) as company stock WITH cost-basis from the original purchases. Right now, the value of the company stock is 96% cost-basis, meaning I've only had 4% growth (I carried through the market collapse and buildup). So while I carry risk holding the company stock and it represents 9.6% of my total portfolio, should I still hold onto it to avoid paying taxes on the original cost basis?
This NUA tax consideration is the one example where investment changes inside a 401K actually do have tax consequences.
A general answer to your question is that risk in single company stock is so large that tax considerations should not cause you to hold an investment like that. However, it is a trade-off of unlike things and can't be compared as cost against cost. If you are a long way from taking the funds and the allocation is large (10% is large in my book), then the advice would be to diversify the investment and move on. Own company stock has the unique combination of risks that if the company is not successful both the stock and one's personal capital are in danger.
damjam wrote:For your current 401k I would use a combination of:
SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER*
SSgA Russell Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER*
SSgA International Index, 0.09% ER
SSgA U.S. Bond Index, 0.06% ER
*S&P 500 + Russell Small Cap will be combined to approximate Total Stock Market.
Investment ratio approximately: 86% S&P 500/14% Russell Small Cap
damjam wrote:So to sum up your current portfolio should look like this:
Current 401k(57%)
30 % SSgA S&P 500 Index
7 % SSgA Russell Small Cap Index*
20 % SSgA U.S. Bond Index
*I've counted the individual large cap stocks as S&P 500 and put more into Russell Small Cap to true up the approximation of Total Stock Market.
For new contributions:
Roth ($5,500)
$5,500 Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)
Current 401k ($22,000)
$11,000 SSgA S&P 500 Index
$ 1,900 SSgA Russell Small Cap Index
$ 4,600 SSgA U.S. Bond Index
$ 4,500 Company ESOP (to then be used for rebalancing)
damjam wrote:As a global strategy I would suggest:
14% Individual Stocks (In taxable, [keeping] mostly to avoid taxes)
42% Total Stock Market
24% Total International Stock Market
20% Total Bond Market
damjam wrote:To implement your portfolio plan you can use ETFs [or Mutual Funds] in your Taxable and Roth.
you can create a three-fund [plus REIT] portfolio using:
Vanguard Total Stock ETF (VTI)
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND)
[ Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ) ] [In Roth only, not tax efficient]
For your 401k at Vanguard I would put the entire balance into:
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor (VGTSX).
For your current 401k I would use a combination of:
SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER*
SSgA Russell Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER*
SSgA International Index, 0.09% ER
SSgA U.S. Bond Index, 0.06% ER
*S&P 500 + Russell Small Cap will be combined to approximate Total Stock Market.
Investment ratio approximately: 86% S&P 500/14% Russell Small Cap
damjam wrote:Over the long term, if you must keep individual stocks try to get it to 10% of your portfolio or less.
BrandonBogle wrote:Based on the discussions others have had with me, I don't know if I'm ready to jump in from 0% Bonds to 20% Bonds
damjam wrote:If you are not comfortable with that then some of my later conclusions about the potential makeup of your portfolio are not going to work.
If you want to have REIT, Okay. You need to decide how much REIT you want. However,I must point something out. REIT is not Bond. REIT is equity and I believe the REIT fund you hold is US equity. So you would need to reduce the percentage attributed to Total Stock Market and/or Individual Stocks.
damjam wrote:You also seemed to have ignored a very important part of my earlier advice:damjam wrote:Over the long term, if you must keep individual stocks try to get it to 10% of your portfolio or less.
In reading that again I realize I wasn't clear, so here it is:
IMHO, you need to dispose of your individual stock positions in your Roth IRA ASAP. There are no tax considerations to hold you back and you need to diversify. Over time (depending on the tax considerations), in your taxable account, you need to get your allocation to individual stocks down to no more than 10% of your portfolio. You are taking on too much risk with individual stocks.
damjam wrote:For your 401k at Vanguard I would put the entire balance into:
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor (VGTSX).
damjam wrote:For your current 401k I would use a combination of:
SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER*
SSgA Russell Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER*
SSgA International Index, 0.09% ER
SSgA U.S. Bond Index, 0.06% ER
*S&P 500 + Russell Small Cap will be combined to approximate Total Stock Market.
Investment ratio approximately: 86% S&P 500/14% Russell Small Cap
damjam wrote:The funds that you should use remain the same and are the following: [additions]damjam wrote:To implement your portfolio plan you can use ETFs [or Mutual Funds] in your Taxable and Roth.
you can create a three-fund [plus REIT] portfolio using:
Vanguard Total Stock ETF (VTI)
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND)
[ Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ) ] [In Roth only, not tax efficient]
damjam wrote:BrandonBogle wrote:Based on the discussions others have had with me, I don't know if I'm ready to jump in from 0% Bonds to 20% Bonds
You need to decide on this question before building your global portfolio and by extension your game plan.
I still highly recommend at least 20% bonds, but it's your choice. Maybe you should search around and read some more threads on 100% stock portfolios and then make up your mind. Like this one: Charlie Ellis & Burton Malkiel say 0% bonds OK under 50.
I won't make any further suggestions until you decide on the REIT and Bond questions. You also need to commit to reducing your individual stock exposure.
damjam wrote:As a global strategy I would suggest:
14% Individual Stocks (In taxable, [keeping] mostly to avoid taxes)
42% Total Stock Market
24% Total International Stock Market
20% Total Bond Market
BrandonBogle wrote:Current Asset Allocation
Taxable (34%)
- 11.5% Large Cap individual stocks (MMM, MO, AAPL, JNJ, KRFT, PM, PG, TGT, WMT)
- 5.0% Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Signal (VTSSX)
- 16.6% Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS)
- 1.4% Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral (VWLUX)
Roth IRA (10%)
- 1.4% Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ)
- 1.9% Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF (VBR)
- 3.5% Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI)
- 3.2% Vanguard Intermediate-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral (VFIDX)
Traditional 401k at Vanguard - Previous Employer (7%)
- 7% Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Investor (VGTSX)
Traditional 401k at Current Employer (49%)
- 11.3% Stable Value, 0.20% ER, 2.5% Blended Yield, 2.2 year duration, 41% turnover
- 6.4% SSgA U.S. Bond Index, 0.06% ER
- 27.0% SSgA S&P 500 Index, 0.02% ER
- 4.4% SSgA Russell 2000 Small Cap Index, 0.06% ER (86% S&P 500/14% Russel 2000)
Return to Investing - Help with Personal Investments
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], BogleBear, cignamic, DSInvestor, fanmail, gerrym51, jdb, K-Bogle, knopflergrass, mnvalue, onedude, pelegray, peppers, rjbraun, roymeo, Simbilis, tractorguy and 72 guests