StrangerDanger wrote:I meet with an estate planner soon. I don't know the first thing about trusts, etc.
Should I get a professional, low-cost wealth manager as well?
My income should continue to rise for a while, but nothing is guaranteed. I already have all the disability, health, life, umbrella insurances I need.
Thank you in advance.
Occupier wrote:Your ahead of where I was at your age, and I still managed to retire at 60. So your not really in need of catching up. You should read either the early Larry Swedroe or William Bernstein books which may be in the library in your town. Look for the ones published in the first 5 years of the last decade. They all discuss 100% equity allocations and they basically conclude that the extra volatility over, say, an 80/20 stock bond portfolio costs you more in down markets than you gain in up markets by having 100% equities. I cant recall whether the optimal percentage was 20% or something like 15%. That assumes you don't add to losses in a down market by selling out at a low and missing a market recovery. If your that kind of investor, you want a much larger bond allocation.
As to "branching out," don't buy into an alternative investment that you don't understand. I have seen smart people make disasterious mistakes in real estate. Further since real estate investing is highly leveraged, the losses are multiplied by the leverage. You really need to have a head for real estate to make money in it, and few people do. So my suggestion is make a good choice in buying a home and pay of the mortgage as fast as you can, and live long and prosper. Dave
retiredjg wrote:welcome to the forum!
I don't see what your concern is all about. You don't seem all that "behind" to me. It's all about getting rid of debt and saving. You've got the savings part down, at least for now.
Should I stay 100% equities in low cost index funds? No to 100% equities. Yes to Index funds.
Is it time to learn more about things like real estate, and branch out, or should I predominately stay in the markets? Real estate is something to consider, if you have an interest, after you get the other things in life in order. Real estate is not a reliable substitute for investments. And not everybody is good at it.
I meet with an estate planner soon. I don't know the first thing about trusts, etc. Why do you think you need an estate planner or trusts?
Should I get a professional, low-cost wealth manager as well? Not necessarily. See if you can do it on your own. Investing can be very simple.
Wiki article link: Getting Started
Grt2bOutdoors wrote:StrangerDanger wrote:I meet with an estate planner soon. I don't know the first thing about trusts, etc.
Should I get a professional, low-cost wealth manager as well?
My income should continue to rise for a while, but nothing is guaranteed. I already have all the disability, health, life, umbrella insurances I need.
Thank you in advance.
Hello and welcome to the forum!
viewtopic.php?t=6212 - Please edit your first post in the format shown to the left. I'm sure you'll get some better advice after that.
If not 100% equities, what ratio of asset allocation do you recommend?
I've been told estate planning is key for folks who have a high potential net worth who need to protect their assets from lawsuits, and pass them down to kids. No?
StrangerDanger wrote:All said, I will put 45k into pre-tax funds and roth this year, and after taxes, save close to 10k a month in cash.
StrangerDanger wrote:I meet with an estate planner soon. I don't know the first thing about trusts, etc.
Watch out for this, if they start to try to sell you any sort of annunity or life insurance for "estate planning" then run because they are not working in your best interest. Getting wills and the related documents in order is a good idea but from what you posted it looks like your net worth is less than $100K right now so you have a long time until you will have any real estate planning issues.
Should I get a professional, low-cost wealth manager as well?
Define low cost. The math does not exactely work out this way but consider that if you invest $100K with someone today and you pay them 1% a year for the next 33 years until you retire at 65, then you have in effect paid them a third of your initial $100K.
You need to be very realistic about just what they might actually be able to do for you and not believe them they if they say that they will pick out superior investments. If they were able to pick superior stocks or mutual funds then they could make a fortune working or trading on will street and they would not be working for you for a small amount each year. At best they could help you with things like avoiding unessary taxes, asset allocation, setting up savings goal, etc.
My income should continue to rise for a while, but nothing is guaranteed. I already have all the disability, health, life, umbrella insurances I need.
Thank you in advance.
supertreat wrote:Are you sure you qualify for a ROTH? I think 2013 income limit for filing jointly is 188k.
aua868s wrote:StrangerDanger wrote:All said, I will put 45k into pre-tax funds and roth this year, and after taxes, save close to 10k a month in cash.
StrangerDanger
I am trying to find avenues to increase my Pre-Tax saving money. You will manage to sock away 45K in pre-tax funds this year? how? My -Pre Tax saving is as follows adds up to 29.5K.
* 401K = 17.5K
* ROTH IRA = 5.5K
* HSA = 6.5K
Do you mind sharing any other avenues for saving more PreTax money?
Thanks
Watty wrote:StrangerDanger wrote:I meet with an estate planner soon. I don't know the first thing about trusts, etc.
Watch out for this, if they start to try to sell you any sort of annunity or life insurance for "estate planning" then run because they are not working in your best interest. Getting wills and the related documents in order is a good idea but from what you posted it looks like your net worth is less than $100K right now so you have a long time until you will have any real estate planning issues.
Should I get a professional, low-cost wealth manager as well?
Define low cost. The math does not exactely work out this way but consider that if you invest $100K with someone today and you pay them 1% a year for the next 33 years until you retire at 65, then you have in effect paid them a third of your initial $100K.
You need to be very realistic about just what they might actually be able to do for you and not believe them they if they say that they will pick out superior investments. If they were able to pick superior stocks or mutual funds then they could make a fortune working or trading on will street and they would not be working for you for a small amount each year. At best they could help you with things like avoiding unessary taxes, asset allocation, setting up savings goal, etc.
My income should continue to rise for a while, but nothing is guaranteed. I already have all the disability, health, life, umbrella insurances I need.
Thank you in advance.
Return to Investing - Help with Personal Investments
Users browsing this forum: jerrygarcia1, mnvalue and 19 guests