Grandpaboys wrote:Limited Term Tax Ex. has a Dist. Income of 1.84%, also no taxes. Much better than Ally .95%, with taxes.
Grandpaboys wrote:Sidney
At 84 years of age I looked at income in my pocket and 1.84% does that for me, compared to what is available else where. I also use Ally Bank's .95% for my emergency money and have living expenses for a year in that account. I also use Tax Ex. fund to give me room for taking long term capital gains and paying no taxes to the limit of the 15% tax bracket.
Grandpaboys wrote:Limited Term Tax Ex. has a Dist. Income of 1.84%, also no taxes. Much better than Ally .95%, with taxes.
Grandpaboys wrote:It is for me. I am only interested in yield I get today. SEC yield does not give me that.
ChrisAZ wrote:Hello everyone,
I hope you are all enjoying your holiday season. Quick question regarding our savings as I have not posted here in while and need to put back on the right track.
We have the ability to save about $6,500/mo. We have a cash emergency fund that is appropriate size for our income. We do not own a home but are looking to potentially buy one in 3-6 years from now. Unfortunately I cannot pin down the time frame any further, which is part of the reason for my dilemma. We would like to put at least 20% down when we finally do purchase.
I am looking for somewhere to keep our medium term savings which will probably (but not definitely) be used for a home purchase down the road. It might also be used for car purchases, etc. I am torn between an online savings account like ING and investing in a municipal bond fund (we are in the 33% tax bracket). More specifically I have been considering all of the following:
ING savings
VMLTX - Vanguard Limited Term Tax Exempt
VWITX - Vanguard Intermediate Term Tax Exempt
We are pretty risk averse however I do not want to lose money to inflation due to an baseless fear of investing. The bond funds seem to have shown slow and steady growth for many years, however I also see a period during the early 80s when that was not the case and the possibility of future interest rate increases has me even more confused on these options.
For some other background, we do invest for retirement according to our predetermined asset allocation. This money would be for targeted savings.
Thanks in advance for any help!
Chris
Grandpaboys wrote:How far forward are you talking about? Look at the Dist. Yield for the past year and it shows my return to be good. If I look at it based on the SEC yield I would not buy the fund. Bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Return on investment is what I look at and if the return goes away, so do I. I have used Dist. Yield for over 20 years and have never lost money.
john94549 wrote:PenFed offers some nice medium-term CDs. Their 2-year CD is 1.5 and the 3-year is 1.75.
Doc wrote:There are two problems with distribution yields. 1) They are retrospective. 2) They are subject to manipulation by a fund manager. At the end of an accounting period the manager could just sell some bonds that are selling at a premium and juice up his yield at least for a short time. The SEC yield is an attempt to stop the manager from doing this and it probably works because knowledgeable folks don't use distribution yield to compare one fund with another - at least over short periods of time. What the distribution yield is good for is telling you how much (monthly) income you can expect over the next few time periods without selling your shares. Boggleheads are taught to think in terms of total return not monthly dividends and interest so this distribution yield doesn't mean a whole lot.
On the other hand SEC yield can give you an idea about the relative risk of two funds with similar maturity/duration. The fund with the higher SEC yield must have more risk (assuming equal fund costs).
Rainier wrote:Assuming the distribution is all coupons and capital gains and not principal then it seems like a good metric to use.
Grandpaboys wrote:"What the distribution yield is good for is telling you how much (monthly) income you can expect over the next few time periods without selling your shares"
That is what I use Dist.Yield for. At 84 age I am not interested what it is going to be 5 to 10 years from now, I may not be here. I am living for today and with the current very low interest rates I try to squeak out all the income I can to pay bills. Why should I get a 5 year CD at Ally Bank paying 1.61% less taxes when I can get 1.84% in Limited TE paying no taxes. Right now I have capital gains in my TE account. If that changes I can sell in 24 hours and invest elsewhere.
Robin wrote:Grandpaboys wrote:"What the distribution yield is good for is telling you how much (monthly) income you can expect over the next few time periods without selling your shares"
That is what I use Dist.Yield for. At 84 age I am not interested what it is going to be 5 to 10 years from now, I may not be here. I am living for today and with the current very low interest rates I try to squeak out all the income I can to pay bills. Why should I get a 5 year CD at Ally Bank paying 1.61% less taxes when I can get 1.84% in Limited TE paying no taxes. Right now I have capital gains in my TE account. If that changes I can sell in 24 hours and invest elsewhere.
As long as you realize that you are receiving a 1.85% cash distribution -- not earning a 1.85% return going forward, in your situation that might be a good solution to whatever your goals are.
dbr wrote:It comes again to the fact that a withdrawal is a withdrawal is a withdrawal. If a person wants money today, it is certainly possible to take whatever one wants by cashing distributions and selling shares. The implication will be what happens to the asset as time goes on.
Return to Investing - Help with Personal Investments
Users browsing this forum: jerrygarcia1, mnvalue and 21 guests