Sidney wrote:income taxes
amortization of major ("capital") items like a car replacement, new roof, replace the furnace .......
I assume food is in the "monthly expenses"
Bacchus01 wrote:Food?
Gas?
Utilities?
I'd be amazed if you can find decent healthcare insurance for 2 people for $700/month that is not a medicare supplement. Is this pre or post medicare?
The Wizard wrote:Aim for $5K/month, hence $60K per year.
30 x that and yer good to go.
So $2M is your goal...
goodoboy wrote:Hello,
I am trying to determine how much we will need for monthly expense after retirement. I need to know to determine if I am saving enough in 401k for retirement needs. I am using a 401k retirement calculator in my 401K account.
I have calculated in today's money, we will need $4500.00 per month to retire.
Retirement Monthly Expense:
Metlife 22.05
xboxlive 11
cell phone 200
House warranty 42
car gas 150
monthly expense 600
a/c warranty 17.98
health care after retire ??? 700
dog stuff 100
yearly vaction save per month 650
lights water gas 290
house alarm 60
comcast 165
car insurance 200
car note 400
house taxes 316.73
house insurance 150.75
lawn service 60
Yearly car and house repairs per month 200
This comes out $4348.78 per month.
Am I missing something? What is rule of thumb?
Thanks for any help or comments.
goodoboy wrote:
I am 34 now.

Ed 2 wrote:goodoboy wrote:On tap of every item you have to put extra 20% a list, inflation, yearly rate increases and usually a lot of more unexpected expenses.
TSR wrote:If Xbox Live ultimately ends up on your list of fixed expenses in retirement, you are DEFINITELY doing it right. Play on, good sir.
I will be playing Call of Duty and Madden until my last breath. LOL!!Boglenaut wrote:goodoboy wrote:
I am 34 now.
It's way way too soon to even start thinking about doing this analysis at any reasonable level of detail. So much can change... markets, inflation, your health, job, wife's job, tax laws, SS laws, kids, where you live, family expenses, windfalls, goals, interests, changes in lifestyle or tastes...... How can you even start to plan a budget for a vacation in the year 2043?
Rule of thumb I use: Save as much as you can while still taking car of true "needs" and selected "wants". Live below your means. If you accidentally save too big of a pile of money, I am sure you'll be able to console yourselves somehow. If you save too small of a pile, you get no do-overs.
So for now just save as much as you can. In 15 years revisit it and see if you can slow down then.
goodoboy wrote:What if I retire and my income $0 for that year? Will my income tax bracket change to less than 25%.
Peter Foley wrote:One rule of thumb often used is to calculate a 4% withdrawal rate. So if you need to withdraw $4500/m, that's $54,000 per year. $54,000/.04 (withdrawal rate) = $1,350,000. Now if you have a pension that will provide $1000 per month, you only need to withdraw $42,000/year. $42,000/.04 = $1,050,000.
There are many who believe that a 4% withdrawal is too much because they expect long term gains from stocks and bonds to be below historical averages. They might make a recommendation of 3% withdrawal. So $54,000/.03 = $1,800,000.
The examples above ignore Social Security. Your starting point should be the number you need to withdraw from saving each year, so reduce your total annual spending by the amount of your SS benefits and any pensions for which you might qualify.
A shameless plug - This is covered in the Bogleheads Guide to Retirement Planning, chapter 1.
BHCadet wrote:Don't forget long term care insurance.
If you plan to self-funded, set aside $250,000 today for two.
Or $4,000 to $5,000 per year for a couple in their 60 to buy LTC insurance.
4% is wildly dangerous unless you have the ability to 'flex' your spending downwards or raise new capital (eg sell your house).
If long term US bond rates are c. 2% then that's giving you a feel for SWR. 2.5% at a stretch.
A better way to calculate SWR is to work out what annuity rate you would get-- ie income from SPIA. *that* is the only truly safe way of doing it. The alternative is to bank on the CPI indexation in US SS-- ie as you get older, SS becomes more important as a source of retirement income relative to fixed SPIAs which are falling in value.
It's not really safe, either, unless it is a CPI indexed annuity. And then, CPI probably lags retiree inflation by at least 0.5% pa (maybe 1% to be safe).
The alternative is to assume 100% in I bonds and TIPS and work out SWR from there.
englishgirl wrote:As you can see from the different answers, nobody knows.
Various things will change in your spending patterns between now and retirement. Yes, healthcare will probably be more. Some things may be less. So, starting from your current spending level is a great idea. Aim to replace 100% of that, and that's (in my opinion) a good start.
Yes, you should account for inflation if you were going to do this properly, but that hurts my head, so I like to do everything in today's dollars. I mean, it's all just guessing, really. If you do account for inflation, you have to guess the inflation rate, and a slight change in that makes the final numbers swing wildly. What you should know when you calculate in today's dollars is that the final "number" that you are aiming for is going to have to be higher due to inflation. So think about doing a rough recalculation every few years, and make sure you are on track.
OK, so you've figured out $4500. Now sign on to the social security website, and get an estimate of how much social security you are going to get. Say that comes out to $2000 per month. For safety's sake, I've seen a lot of recommendations to assume you'll only get 75% of this, so let's say we're talking $1500. Now you need your retirement portfolio to generate $3000 per month. Now, as another exercise, you could go to immediateannuities.com and see how much you'll have to save to replace all or half of this. Doing a quick estimate for a male aged 66 in my state, I get $517k if you were retiring today and bought an annuity today to replace $3000 per month, or $259k to replace $1500 (single life, no inflation adjustment - you would want some sort of inflation adjustment, which will cost extra, and a joint annuity will cost extra too). The annuity number is your minimum - it leaves you no extra for fun stuff, no inflation adjustment, and no control over your money. But, it's an option. It gives you some income flexibility. I would think about replacing your income like this:
$1500 = social security
$1500 = annuity, costs $250k-$300k ish
$1500 = portfolio, assuming a 3% withdrawal rate, costs $600k (or $450k if we assume a 4% withdrawal rate).
There you go. $600k - $900k is your minimum. And somewhere around $2M seems to be a reasonable upper limit, based on other suggestions on this thread. See, even when I tried to ignore inflation to stop my calculations swinging wildly, I still end up with a $1.4M spread. I have similar monthly spending to you, and decided I'd aim for $1.5M as it is somewhere in the middle. In today's dollars, of course - this'll need to be adjusted upwards due to inflation, but if you focus on saving a percentage of your income, hopefully the income will keep pace with inflation and so your amount that you save will also keep pace with inflation.
Peter Foley wrote:Valuethinker wrote:4% is wildly dangerous unless you have the ability to 'flex' your spending downwards or raise new capital (eg sell your house).
If long term US bond rates are c. 2% then that's giving you a feel for SWR. 2.5% at a stretch.
A better way to calculate SWR is to work out what annuity rate you would get-- ie income from SPIA. *that* is the only truly safe way of doing it. The alternative is to bank on the CPI indexation in US SS-- ie as you get older, SS becomes more important as a source of retirement income relative to fixed SPIAs which are falling in value.
It's not really safe, either, unless it is a CPI indexed annuity. And then, CPI probably lags retiree inflation by at least 0.5% pa (maybe 1% to be safe).
The alternative is to assume 100% in I bonds and TIPS and work out SWR from there.
While I agree 4% is on the high side, that 4% does come from the Trinity Study of 30 year periods. A number of subsequent studies have shown that even 4.5% is safe if you do not take the full inflationary increase each year, or reset every 5-7 years (your flex spending suggestion). I'm not recommending 4%, but I do think the Trinity Study remains a good starting point. IMHO it is a better starting point than looking at annuities, I bond and TIPs in a historically low interest rate period. Again, I say starting point - which is why I offered a more conservative 3% suggestion. I would feel better about other approaches if there were a body of research to support such estimates.
Return to Investing - Help with Personal Investments
Users browsing this forum: BL, BostonBoy, Clearly_Irrational, connya, flipflopliving, froggy, investnoob13, jvclark02, MJM, mnvalue, Rammer and 113 guests