| Author |
Message |
Topic: Anyone selling TIPS? |
Rodc
Replies: 14
Views: 984
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:00 pm Subject: Anyone selling TIPS? |
What's the point of selling them? What would I buy with the proceeds?
More TIPS, and if the ones I sell are up, so are the ones I buy.
It's the basic problem of fixed-income assets. If what yo ... |
Topic: How about taking everything out of stocks no matter what age |
Rodc
Replies: 9
Views: 389
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:26 pm Subject: How about taking everything out of stocks no matter what age |
Times are never normal. When times feel great is often the time of greatest risk (think 1999).
Stocks may go down again.
Bonds could easily under perform for years to come.
Inflation could re ... |
Topic: 4% Safe Annual Withdrawal for Longer Retirement Periods |
Rodc
Replies: 15
Views: 840
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:18 am Subject: 4% Safe Annual Withdrawal for Longer Retirement Periods |
| Fortunately no one (I hope) really believes these sorts of studies are directly useful in making firm long term plans, and at best only provide a ballpark estimate that needs to be monitored and adjus ... |
Topic: Domestic vs. International exposure |
Rodc
Replies: 21
Views: 912
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:57 am Subject: Domestic vs. International exposure |
Sure, 20% to 40% is reasonable. Could even go higher.
Three important notes, I think:
1) the actual amount is not all that likely to matter much
2) more important is to keep to whatever plan yo ... |
Topic: 4% Safe Annual Withdrawal for Longer Retirement Periods |
Rodc
Replies: 15
Views: 840
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:49 am Subject: 4% Safe Annual Withdrawal for Longer Retirement Periods |
These are interesting studies,
But the uncertainties in any such projection grow exponentially with time.
That is small errors in assumptions grow exponentially.
We all know the power of exp ... |
Topic: Larry's Blog: Good News Update |
Rodc
Replies: 31
Views: 2029
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:16 am Subject: Larry's Blog: Good News Update |
Geeze, tough bunch.
Yep, tough bunch. Cos he went against the grain. Almost all the literature asks me to tune off the news, not analyse it.
Easier to tune out the news if you recognize the sc ... |
Topic: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
Rodc
Replies: 29
Views: 2441
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:43 am Subject: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
| Its funny to consider markets as the leading indicator - of all changes absolute (2.5% or greater change a day) since the 50's 95 out of 323 times occurred from 8/07 thru 10/09 - does any one think th ... |
Topic: Larry's Blog: Good News Update |
Rodc
Replies: 31
Views: 2029
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:39 am Subject: Larry's Blog: Good News Update |
Geeze, tough bunch.
Certainly you all don't think an unbalanced view helps do you?
No offense but this seems like an awful lot of nit picking.
All he said is having a balanced view is helpful ... |
Topic: 5 myths about home ownership |
Rodc
Replies: 110
Views: 6782
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:51 am Subject: 5 myths about home ownership |
People often speak of the "freedom" you have in doing what you want, with your own house and on your own property, as opposed to if you're renting.
I say that's just an illusion people li ... |
Topic: Excel & Efficient Frontier |
Rodc
Replies: 11
Views: 701
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:30 am Subject: Excel & Efficient Frontier |
| One can tame MVO weirdness to some degree using ideas borrowed from Ridge Regression and such, but still of limited use as you have at best one significant digit to the inputs (really more like half a ... |
Topic: Bonds Outperforming Socks For The Long Run |
Rodc
Replies: 22
Views: 1948
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 9:37 pm Subject: Bonds Outperforming Socks For The Long Run |
| Alec, as I mentioned I'm not trying to say I know where things are going. I'm also holding my Jan 2016 TIPS. But my latest purchases were to sell 20yr TIPS and buy short term investment grade. So t ... |
Topic: Annual Rate of Return |
Rodc
Replies: 2
Views: 301
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:45 pm Subject: Annual Rate of Return |
The command you want looks like:
=XIRR(C22:C239,A22:A239)
Where column C is how much you put in each time and column A is the date.
The only tricky part is the last entry of column C is minus ... |
Topic: Bonds Outperforming Socks For The Long Run |
Rodc
Replies: 22
Views: 1948
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:15 pm Subject: Bonds Outperforming Socks For The Long Run |
Fortunately most of us sample hundreds of entry points. (and exit points)
I'd be more concerned about entry points if I had one lump sum and that was all I was ever going to get.
All that said, ... |
Topic: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
Rodc
Replies: 29
Views: 2441
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:12 pm Subject: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
It may be worth noting that TSM is still 25% off peak.
If we had a more gradual steady decline to this point people would not be worried about the market being so high, they would be lamenting how ... |
Topic: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
Rodc
Replies: 29
Views: 2441
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:44 pm Subject: Re: Worth noting |
It may be worth noting that TSM is still 25% off peak.
This is also worth noting:
When I started investing in the early 50s, the S&P was fluctuating around 25. Today it is over 1,100.
Y ... |
Topic: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
Rodc
Replies: 29
Views: 2441
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:42 am Subject: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
It may be worth noting that TSM is still 25% off peak.
The market will always be at or below the peak. But rebalancing would have you selling as it reaches its peak and buying after the crash. ... |
Topic: W.Bernstein/ Gordon equation fans.......... |
Rodc
Replies: 9
Views: 1096
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 10:22 am Subject: W.Bernstein/ Gordon equation fans.......... |
| I was wondering the same thing , would Dr. Bernstein still reccommend foreign and domestic stocks? When he wrote his book the US current dividend yield was 2.5 %; now it has dropped to around 2%. Wit ... |
Topic: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
Rodc
Replies: 29
Views: 2441
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:31 pm Subject: Right Time to Get Back Into The Stock Market? |
I would appreciate opinions on what exactly is fueling this current market rally? (since last March?) Is it the falling dollar?
Without getting into politics, unemployment is still at an all-time h ... |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:49 pm Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
I wonder if anyone has ever tried to determine a rebalancing algorithm by using the efficient frontier calculation?
There should be 2 reasons for rebalancing: (1) shift from your risk target and (2 ... |
Topic: Stock diversification vs. concentration |
Rodc
Replies: 34
Views: 2601
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:14 pm Subject: Stock diversification vs. concentration |
I'm merely arguing my proposition that it's futile to do widely-diversified active management.
Hi at,
If that is the point you are making, I agree.
Though I am still unclear why are you argui ... |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:11 pm Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Holding a fixed portfolio is not likely to capture much, if any, of the momentum effect.
Yep, that is correct essentially by definition.
In fact, rebalancing can be an "anti-momentum&quo ... |
Topic: Backtesting, Lump Sums, DCA |
Rodc
Replies: 12
Views: 564
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:12 am Subject: Backtesting, Lump Sums, DCA |
No I made a bunch of 100K investments which each lasted 10 years. Maybe the pseudo code would be:
For years 1991 to 1999
for months 1 to 12
start investment
calculated 10 year returns
... |
Topic: Stock diversification vs. concentration |
Rodc
Replies: 34
Views: 2601
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:58 am Subject: Stock diversification vs. concentration |
The most recent studies noted in the links I provided state that AT LEAST 350 stocks are needed to eliminate most of the US systemic risk.
Can you quantify what you mean by "most" of th ... |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:51 am Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
| It really depends on whether or not there is short term momentum. If prices are truly a random walk rebalancing daily might be optimal (though I doubt the magnitude would make it possible to pick out ... |
Topic: Daily bubble ? : Are stocks and BONDS too risky right now? |
Rodc
Replies: 6
Views: 931
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 9:31 am Subject: Daily bubble ? : Are stocks and BONDS too risky right now? |
| While as a general proposition I definitely agree bond risks are lower in magnitude over the short and intermediate term than the risks for stocks, and maybe generally in the long term too (but not al ... |
Topic: Would a 1949 investor have forseen 1999? 2009? |
Rodc
Replies: 6
Views: 469
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:07 pm Subject: Would a 1949 investor have forseen 1999? 2009? |
| I don't think the last 60 years in the stock market have been all that surprising. To someone in 1949 who had direct knowledge of the Great Depression and perhaps had parents with direct memory of the ... |
Topic: Dollar Cost Averaging! Where did we go wrong? |
Rodc
Replies: 31
Views: 4172
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:18 pm Subject: Dollar Cost Averaging! Where did we go wrong? |
Your money would not always be sub-optimally invested using DCA. Getting to your target AA immediately would not help right before a sharp market decline or a protracted bear market.
That seems to ... |
Topic: Backtesting, Lump Sums, DCA |
Rodc
Replies: 12
Views: 564
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 4:16 pm Subject: Backtesting, Lump Sums, DCA |
I'm a bit lost on what you did.
Did you do compute returns 1991-2000, 1992-2001, ... etc. only using first of the month start times?
If so:
1991-2008 is 17 years. This results in less than 2 ... |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 3:50 pm Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
"
Here is what we did. The eight asset classes included Large-Cap Growth, Mid-Cap Growth, Small-Cap Growth, Large-Cap Value, Mid-Cap Value, Small-Cap Value, REITs and International. Equal am ... |
Topic: Dollar Cost Averaging! Where did we go wrong? |
Rodc
Replies: 31
Views: 4172
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:20 am Subject: Dollar Cost Averaging! Where did we go wrong? |
Spend your money don't make the mistake my father did. All his money invested, then died and enjoyed none of it. Another words, DIE BROKE.
Dying broke is easy.
Going broke the day before you die ... |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:18 am Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
"I know one answer to this question might be momentum. Is that valid, and are there other reasons?"
Two of us ran an 18 year study using 8 major asset classes and we found that rebalancin ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 8:04 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Peter,
Very interesting citations |
Topic: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
Rodc
Replies: 53
Views: 2685
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:57 pm Subject: In theory, why wouldn't it be best to rebalance every day? |
| It really depends on whether or not there is short term momentum. If prices are truly a random walk rebalancing daily might be optimal (though I doubt the magnitude would make it possible to pick out ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:14 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
"Information" is a deeper concept that just "opinion" or "news" (it's about more than just "facts", too).
agreed |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:33 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
| I guess I do agree with Siegel that the theoretically interesting "extension" about zigging and zagging disappears if you apply MPT over a period in which the SD of a 100% stock portfolio is ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:14 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Hi Rod,
I already have a headache so I'm not going to make much of an effort to articulate a position here, but I guess my first reaction to your post is that if "Modern Portfolio Theory" ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:06 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
FWIW, MPT is really at its heart extremely simple.
If I have three estimates of the temperature then taking the average is generally better than picking just one of those temperatures.
We can ma ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:50 am Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
How can information be wrong? Interpretation can be wrong, but facts tend to be facts/
"information" is only facts?
What about news in the papers, on the TV, or on the Web?
Isn't t ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:40 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
How can information be wrong? Interpretation can be wrong, but facts tend to be facts/
"information" is only facts?
What about news in the papers, on the TV, or on the Web?
Isn't t ... |
Topic: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
Rodc
Replies: 59
Views: 3561
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:35 pm Subject: Modern Portfolio Theory tested with recent market behavior |
| MPT is good for getting a general idea of why diversification is good, maybe some general idea of the benefit, but worthless as far as setting up an allocation to three significant digits. Or even 2. ... |
Topic: Add an "equity valuation factor" to rebalancing? |
Rodc
Replies: 14
Views: 867
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:35 am Subject: Add an "equity valuation factor" to rebalancing? |
I'm curious if the folks who use a shifting asset allocation have carefully benchmarked their returns, and if so what are the returns and risk of their approach vs the benchmark.
Real time, not bac ... |
Topic: Add an "equity valuation factor" to rebalancing? |
Rodc
Replies: 14
Views: 867
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:30 am Subject: Add an "equity valuation factor" to rebalancing? |
One look at this idea:
http://home.comcast.net/~rodec/finance/papers/Q-timingV2.pdf
I don't claim this is the end all and be all of what one can do, but if nothing else it shows this is not a sl ... |
Topic: Gross: stocks and other assets may be 100% overvalued |
Rodc
Replies: 30
Views: 2640
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 6:57 pm Subject: Gross: stocks and other assets may be 100% overvalued |
| If that were true wouldn't it show up in a slow doubling of PE10, q, etc. over that time (with fluctuations for noise of course)? |
Topic: Greenblatt's view on why value investing works |
Rodc
Replies: 4
Views: 483
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:51 pm Subject: Greenblatt's view on why value investing works |
and get those 30% CAGRs
I missed the 30% CAGR. Value investing may be useful (and may not), but rather consistent 30% from value investing is non-sense, IMHO.
Even Madoff was not crazy enough to ... |
Topic: Greenblatt's view on why value investing works |
Rodc
Replies: 4
Views: 483
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 1:23 pm Subject: Greenblatt's view on why value investing works |
| I find it extremely hard to believe that everyone is so obsessed with year-to-year performance that they are knowingly and willingly ignore all these incredible longer-term opportunities. Since ~50% o ... |
Topic: Bonds may have some risk, but won't wreck your retirement? |
Rodc
Replies: 27
Views: 2246
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:31 pm Subject: Bonds may have some risk, but won't wreck your retirement? |
Fascinating. Especially the lack of a difference between Age in Bonds and a straight 60/40 allocation. It does makes sense when you step back from it.
I don't find this lack of difference very ... |
Topic: Most expensive colleges |
Rodc
Replies: 72
Views: 4193
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:27 pm Subject: Most expensive colleges |
i think you're correct - the state school figure did not include room and board. it's still a huge difference though.
Question:
What are the trends in the cost of college education?
Response:
... |
Topic: Most expensive colleges |
Rodc
Replies: 72
Views: 4193
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:51 am Subject: Most expensive colleges |
| well with tuition at only $857 and fees at $4,681 it looks like they are playing with semantics and calling what would normally called "tuition" at most schools and including it under the &q ... |
Topic: Most expensive colleges |
Rodc
Replies: 72
Views: 4193
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 9:12 am Subject: Most expensive colleges |
FWIW:
In-state UMass Amherst, per semester
Tuition $857
Fees $4681
Room $2200
Meals $2000
------------------
Total $9378 per semester
Total $19,476 per year
Costs vary a little dependi ... |
Topic: Most expensive colleges |
Rodc
Replies: 72
Views: 4193
|
Forum: Investing - Theory, News & General Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 10:01 pm Subject: Most expensive colleges |
1. fees are not that much. the difference if you are a resident in state vs. non-resident out of state can be big - but misc. fees are nominal
Since I write the checks I can tell you they certainl ... |
| |