...but the funds are 1) too many, 2) too loaded with costs, 3) seem designed to go through his brokerage preffered relationships.
Yes, yes, and yes. Your instincts are right. You can do much better than this.
...but the funds are 1) too many, 2) too loaded with costs, 3) seem designed to go through his brokerage preffered relationships.

dcw213 wrote:...but decided in late 2008 that I would not put a dollar in the stock market that I knew I would need in the next 5-10 years.
Kitkat76 wrote:And do people have a general cut off for tax cost ratio whereby a fund is considered tax inefficient?
matjen wrote:Assuming this is a lot of money it is an absolute no-brainer.