BahamaMan wrote:Beliavsky wrote:If you don't know what asset returns are going to be, what is your alternative to simulation?
Historical Backtesting seems the Best we've got!
VictoriaF wrote:mickeyd wrote:Why do we keep digging up this old dog?
Long threads strengthen the sense of community.
Leeraar wrote:protagonist wrote:I am opposed to people selling (and yes, often for profit) ideas as scientifically and statistically valid when they are not. That is at the least self-delusional and at worst deceptive.
I see the issue as misunderstanding, or misreprsenting, the risk.