What's your take on "one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost?"Clearly_Irrational wrote:nisiprius wrote:Wow. Just wow. Breathtaking. Bookmarked.
Meh, he defines his conclusion then accepts his definition.
Could you be clearer about what that purpose might be? What's Time, Inc. got that Mc-Graw Hill ain't got?Len33 wrote:Thanks for the recommendations. For my current purpose, I specifically need a newspaper or magazine article. Any suggestions there?