No, I just wanted to know if you had an opinion.placeholder wrote:Do you expect me to do a nation wide survey of a representative sample of plans to see if any came down?
Are you saying that you have no way of knowing what plans other than yours costs? Or are you asking what a low cost 401(k) plan looks like so that you can use it as a benchmark to compare the cost and investment performance of 401(k) plans?placeholder wrote:How would I possibly know?
Beelzebozo wrote:My opinion on revenue sharing is that it is wholly unnecessary in this day and age.
hoppy08520 wrote:I'm glad people post these success stories as a way to motivate others to agitate just a little bit.
copesetic wrote:We looked into that with EF and they said we can't setup our plan this way.
Clever_Username wrote:OP: have you checked out How to Campaign for a better 401(k) plan in the wiki?
spsbo1 wrote:Has anyone had experience dealing with them as Third Party Administrators of 401Ks?
I'm not sure what you have in mind. Please elaborate.peppers wrote:What about a vesting Schedule? My plan requires an individual to be with the company three years before the company match is vested.
krayzbone227 wrote:I was referring to 401(k) vs 401(k)/Profit Sharing vs Profit Sharing as 3 different iterations, with your interest perhaps just on the first two.