accbh wrote:pkcrafter wrote:At that time he's 75 with 325k.
75 with 650k, actually. The assumption is that stocks will always rebound after a 15-year period.
Maybe I split the difference and go 50/50. That sounds like a good wishy-washy solution.
Which would you choose?
Professor Emeritus wrote:Playing around with bogus "asset allocation" that ignores the largest asset is simply silly.
chaz wrote:I stay the course.
chaz wrote:Bogleheads avoid market timing.
pkcrafter wrote:As time goes on, say 20 years, you have index funds outperforming about 80% of active funds