pkcrafter wrote:If 10 year forecasts are reliable, why do they do them every year? In GMOs case, every quarter.
TJSI wrote: A 5% buyback does not result in an automatic 5% increase in share price.
accbh wrote:pkcrafter wrote:At that time he's 75 with 325k.
75 with 650k, actually. The assumption is that stocks will always rebound after a 15-year period.
Maybe I split the difference and go 50/50. That sounds like a good wishy-washy solution.
Which would you choose?
Professor Emeritus wrote:Playing around with bogus "asset allocation" that ignores the largest asset is simply silly.