Rodc wrote:Alistair wrote:Is the 45/65 the Bayesian bit?
Cap weight a couple of years ago; after last year might be higher US now, haven't looked. My acceptable level of crudeity is around 10 percent so I don't pay that much attention. Plus historically the precise split has been pretty unimportant.
livesoft wrote:Life will be tough if one gives up so easily on using internet search tools.
solonseneca wrote:Based on this chart I suppose it would be wrong to suggest that if Vanguard were a stock that one should buy it....
g$$ wrote:Do you have any kids? You could find more tax advantaged space with a 529. Or maybe you can contribute to an HSA?
It appears that there is strong evidence that DFA advisors have significantly underperformed in the largest five DFA funds over the past five years.
BuckyBadger wrote:Does the car have ESC? I wouldn't put my (hypothetical) toddler in a 1999 anything unless I didn't have any other choice.
Safety DOES advance, and those advances have value.
FFFollower wrote:I also am toying with the idea of putting the kids on a performance system. Something like:
4.0gpa dad pays 100%, and an allowance
3.5gpa dad pays 90%, no allowance
3.0gpa dad pays 80%
And so on. Thoughts?